Re: Do philosophical theories
aijazali or diwana and for that matter anyone else, are all grown up mature people who can speak for themselves, so i am not trying to buck them up, but still I would say perhaps you can consider appreciating them a little too for the amount of energy they spend in arguing with someone whose counters are based solely on the links that show up first in her google search and without verifying their validity in the light of science, she simply copy and pastes them and posts them here. I have come across the sources that she has been picking up the data from and seems so never even once she tries to ascertain the authenticity of the information she chooses to paste all over the place.
Here is some deeper look into the ridiculous claim and shameless lies dished out by evolutionists, for the sake of supporting their theories, that human dna is 99% similar to chimps’.
The actual research paper whose excerpts were misused to make this claim:
The nonsensical idea that human and chimp DNA are 99% similar comes from misinterpreting a 1975 paper by Mary-Claire King and A. C. Wilson. This groundbreaking (for its time) article compared several proteins in chimpanzees to their equivalent proteins in humans.
The below link talks in details about the most recent researches going into the study of human and apes’ genes:THE MYTH OF HOMOLOGY
Oh yes, all my links are totally inauthentic and false, just like you say. This is why evolution is taught in schools, universities, displayed in nearly ALL the museums of natural history. the reason why nearly all scientists accept is is because it’s false and has no evidence.
O btw, the link you posted is from Harun Yahya! hmm I wonder where he gets all his information from.. and you call my links inauthentic. nice one
