Do philosophical theories

[Southie]

Re: Do philosophical theories

@psyah

I am arguing from the perspective of philosophical natural order being based on what is beneficial to us and what is harmful to us … Just because you are unaware of the harms you think homosexuality harms no one … But it does … It harms themselves and society … And some things have harms that outweigh the benefits … Sexual perversion is a neuroses and controlled heterosexual urges which are tapped out in a specific way is the natural way for humans to control them.

Since certain things are shunned in society that does not make them necessarily banned … Who is arguing for that? I am not … You are putting words in my mouth if you think that … My stance is philosophical … Arguing that homosexuality is wrong and that it is right to maintain its taboo and it is right to shun it in a similar way to sex before marriage, etc … It is not right to harm people or treat them differently.

When a philosophical conclusion is drawn it is not all of a sudden implied that the law must change … No … It merely means that similar conclusions drawn from religion can be drawn from pure thought and analysis too … Just as it my opinion to follow my faith and not impose it on any one likewise my philosophical conclusions are the same.

Perspective of philosophical natural order. Big words. Means jack.

Just because you think views such as your harm no one.. but they do. Such views harm yourself and society. And such views have harms that outweigh benefits. Such views are symptomatic of neorosis. And having progressive and accepting views is the only way for humans to control them.

Just because discriminatory views are shunned in progressive society doesn’t mean they should be banned. I am not arguing for that. My stance is philosophical. Arguing that such views are wrong and should be shunned by society. I am not arguing for change of law. That such views be banned. It means conclusions drawn from decency can be drawn from pure thought and analysis.