Do philosophical theories

[psyah]

Re: Do philosophical theories

@bella88

peace psyah

Not true. all animals are not actually bisexual, many are exclusively homosexual aswell. even in the presence of opposite gender, they are attracted to the same gender. homosexuality exists in all species, homophobia exists only in 1, and that is humans.

since we are getting graphic, you should know it is perfectly normal to achieve orgasm through that, and anal sex stimulates prostate in men, and also plenty of heterosexual women also engage in this sort of anal penetration behavior too because of abundant nerve endings. of course it is pleasurable why else do they engage in it? since you talk about anus being used for #2, what do males use for #1? i should feel completely grossed out then that the same organ a man uses to pee , is using for sex! see the problem here with your explanation of dirty and gross? Also a womans mouth or hands weren’t made to please a man’s 'organ’either yet they do it all the time, doesn’t make it right or wrong. disgusting or not, thats personal opinion which can differ from people to people. just because something sounds gross to you, doesn’t mean it needs to be criminalized or condemned.
i have never heard a doctor advise against oral sex. you might think its ‘unclean’, that doesn’t make it a universal fact. most straight couples do engage in such ‘unnatural’ oral behavior.

so if something doesn’t have medical benefit, it should be banned? what are benefits of heterosexual behavior other than producing children? and even that, is a problem as the world is highly over populated.
secondly, something shouldn’t be banned because it gives no medical benefit.things that should be banned are the ones that cause harm. please show me what is so harmful about homosexuality?
once again, you are entitled to have your opinion on homosexuality as being wrong as per your faith and religious reasoning but to dictate how others must live their lives isn’t fair either. even if its something wrong according to you, does it really matter what someone does with their lives when it doesn’t have an impact on anyone else ?

I am arguing from the perspective of philosophical natural order being based on what is beneficial to us and what is harmful to us … Just because you are unaware of the harms you think homosexuality harms no one … But it does … It harms themselves and society … And some things have harms that outweigh the benefits … Sexual perversion is a neuroses and controlled heterosexual urges which are tapped out in a specific way is the natural way for humans to control them.

Since certain things are shunned in society that does not make them necessarily banned … Who is arguing for that? I am not … You are putting words in my mouth if you think that … My stance is philosophical … Arguing that homosexuality is wrong and that it is right to maintain its taboo and it is right to shun it in a similar way to sex before marriage, etc … It is not right to harm people or treat them differently.

When a philosophical conclusion is drawn it is not all of a sudden implied that the law must change … No … It merely means that similar conclusions drawn from religion can be drawn from pure thought and analysis too … Just as it my opinion to follow my faith and not impose it on any one likewise my philosophical conclusions are the same.