Do philosophical theories

[bella88]

Re: Do philosophical theories

peace psyah

@psyah

Peace bella88

In case you have forgotten I already made the distinction and recognise before you having to impress the point that homosexuality is in nature … But that is not an argument for it to be right philosophically speaking … Because another meaning of nature is to be in accordance with the natural order … And that it is not … There are many things in nature that are not in accordance with the natural order …

It’s not innate only humans argue that point … All homosexual animals are actually bisexual actually they are just sex maniacs …and do it with anything that moves … That neither makes them homosexual nor anything else. Humans are the only creature who will avoid having sex the normal way and claim to be of a given orientation. Show me any specific animal that when given the chance to mate with the opposite sex has no interest but when sees the same sex wants to go for it …

Not true. all animals are not actually bisexual, many are exclusively homosexual aswell. even in the presence of opposite gender, they are attracted to the same gender. homosexuality exists in all species, homophobia exists only in 1, and that is humans.

Now let’s be more graphic about this … From the rectum we defecate, excrete waste material … How many germs, bacteria, horrid smells lurk there? A child could tell you it’s a disgusting place … Why is it pleasurable? Because if it didn’t bring relief we would never want to go for a dump … The call of nature … i.e. Going for a number 2, is a time consumption, smelly act, can be quite dirty too … We would despise it if it didn’t bring us some relief … That passage should be one way …

since we are getting graphic, you should know it is perfectly normal to achieve orgasm through that, and anal sex stimulates prostate in men, and also plenty of heterosexual women also engage in this sort of anal penetration behavior too because of abundant nerve endings. of course it is pleasurable why else do they engage in it? since you talk about anus being used for #2, what do males use for #1? i should feel completely grossed out then that the same organ a man uses to pee , is using for sex! see the problem here with your explanation of dirty and gross? Also a womans mouth or hands weren’t made to please a man’s 'organ’either yet they do it all the time, doesn’t make it right or wrong. disgusting or not, thats personal opinion which can differ from people to people. just because something sounds gross to you, doesn’t mean it needs to be criminalized or condemned.

Oral sex … Well equally so … Those places known as our privates are not the cleanest of places … Nesting grounds for bugs and bacteria … Putting the mouth there is dire and I would say medically unwise …

i have never heard a doctor advise against oral sex. you might think its ‘unclean’, that doesn’t make it a universal fact. most straight couples do engage in such ‘unnatural’ oral behavior.

Please argue that there are medical benefits in that sort of behaviour … Please do.

so if something doesn’t have medical benefit, it should be banned? what are benefits of heterosexual behavior other than producing children? and even that, is a problem as the world is highly over populated.
secondly, something shouldn’t be banned because it gives no medical benefit.things that should be banned are the ones that cause harm. please show me what is so harmful about homosexuality?
once again, you are entitled to have your opinion on homosexuality as being wrong as per your faith and religious reasoning but to dictate how others must live their lives isn’t fair either. even if its something wrong according to you, does it really matter what someone does with their lives when it doesn’t have an impact on anyone else ?