Re: Do philosophical theories
Peace bella88
In case you have forgotten I already made the distinction and recognise before you having to impress the point that homosexuality is in nature … But that is not an argument for it to be right philosophically speaking … Because another meaning of nature is to be in accordance with the natural order … And that it is not … There are many things in nature that are not in accordance with the natural order …
It’s not innate only humans argue that point … All homosexual animals are actually bisexual actually they are just sex maniacs …and do it with anything that moves … That neither makes them homosexual nor anything else. Humans are the only creature who will avoid having sex the normal way and claim to be of a given orientation. Show me any specific animal that when given the chance to mate with the opposite sex has no interest but when sees the same sex wants to go for it …
Now let’s be more graphic about this … From the rectum we defecate, excrete waste material … How many germs, bacteria, horrid smells lurk there? A child could tell you it’s a disgusting place … Why is it pleasurable? Because if it didn’t bring relief we would never want to go for a dump … The call of nature … i.e. Going for a number 2, is a time consumption, smelly act, can be quite dirty too … We would despise it if it didn’t bring us some relief … That passage should be one way …
Oral sex … Well equally so … Those places known as our privates are not the cleanest of places … Nesting grounds for bugs and bacteria … Putting the mouth there is dire and I would say medically unwise …
Please argue that there are medical benefits in that sort of behaviour … Please do.