Do philosophical theories

[diwana]

Re: Do philosophical theories

@goodname

Let me break it down into simple sentences: Homosexuality is when two men or two women engage in sexual behavior with each other. They do it consensually i.e. willingly and happily. There know what they are doing. There is no coercion involved. Both partners benefit. And no one gets harmed. Which is why their intimate life should be none of anyone else’s concern.

In stark contrast, in the case of bestiality, a person engages in a sexual activity with an animal. The animal does not give its consent. The animal does not have any say in the sexual act being performed. That is why bestiality is cruel and abuse. Likewise, in case of pedophilia or child pornography, there is clear exploitation of a child. The age of consent in most societies is 16. And any pervert who abuses a child deserves to be fully punished and thrown into the jail.

Recap: Unlike bestiality and other perverted behavior, homosexuality like heterosexuality involves two adults who do the deed consensually with each other. Because of the consent and the fact that both partners are adults and competent to make decisions, neither of the partners nor anyone else gets adversely affected or harmed. Therefore no need for hatred or vitriol in this case.

Hope that helps.

As I said earlier, I do not agree with any of the acts in question.

I made argument of why some acts are considered right and some acts wrong.

I also mentioned there are arguments for bestiality being right and places where this act is considered acceptable.

I do know what homosexuality is and what it entails. You did not tell me anything different.

What I said and asked was:

What if in pedophilia or bestiality other partner is not harmed?

The** issue of consent** also has double standard and selectively over-rated, since where homosexuality and bestiality is allowed, polygamy is not allowed despite the fact that adults with full consents are involved.

Now, I brought the issue of polygamy since I do know at least one opposite view member did say polygamy is unacceptable.

Let me simplify here:

It is not about pleasure or attraction. Since the act of homosexuality will be wrong if pleasure or attraction is used as arguments to support it.

It is not about not having choice since pedophiliacs, animal sex lovers, alcoholics, smokers, obese binge eaters, and drug addicts can and have brought same argument.

It is not about compatibility since there IS no anatomical compatibility between homosexual couples.

It is not about freedom, since a whole lot of wrong doers can claim freedom including smokers wanting to smoke in a restauant to those who may want to have incestuous acts legitimize.

**
It is about the combination of ALL factors.

Heterosexuality by all means at all accounts is correct and right act. Homosexuality is wrongful act as it can be.**