Do philosophical theories

[diwana]

Re: Do philosophical theories

@TLK

Incest may be, but child porn and bestiality are not a victim less crime. So you cant gel that in this example.

Bestiality also has no real victim if done ‘properly’. One has to prove if animal was indeed a victim and did not ‘enjoy’ the act.

The term which is used to make bestiality wrong is ‘animal cruelty’ by those who oppose it. But what if the animal actually did not get ‘abused’ or harmed? What then?

I am not saying bestiality is right. I am saying why the selective support for homosexuality and be against bestiality? Plain and simple inconsistency.

In regards to child porn, or pedophilia, as well as bestiality if done without harming the counterpart, homosexuality is indeed similar to these acts since the common reason to be engaged in these perverted and horrible acts is getting pleasure out something without thinking if the other counterpart is suitable for the act.

I did post a link in which there are people who do not bellieve bestiality is wrong and homosexuality is approved by them too.

Again: I am against child porn, pedophilia, bestiality as well as homosexuality.

@goodname

True that. It is always sad to see people peddling hatred and false equivalences that make absolutely no sense. How difficult is it to understand that unlike bestiality or pedophilia, homosexuality entails consent and involves two adults who actually harm nobody? It’s hardly rocket science. A person may not agree with homosexuality as a practice but it’s nothing short of bigotry to compare homosexuality with something as perverted as pedophilia, or to denigrate gays or lesbians.

Read above.

The hatred is against the act not to those who are affected by this disease.