There are two issues. At a bigger scale oppression of the new ideas from the society is one. At a smaller scale, supression of individual freedom at young age is another. They are not entirely without link. One conditions this mentality at a smaller scale and at a bigger scale, i.e. while interacting state or society, you continue to have a frightened mental frame.
True, west is not all that perfect. Not everyone is a very independent thinker. Just like Pakistanis or Indians about whom you know what they are going to say about most of the issues even before you talk to them, 72 percent Americans think that bombing of Iraq was right, 82 percent think that god loves them, 92 percent think that coc-cola is the greatest drink in the world and so on. You may ask who is not conditioned? Well.. everyone seems.
The point is that at least once in a while they seem to have an urge to break open at least in few individuals and they can change the flow. Americans were anti-china and people were conditioned so. Suddenly Kissinger managed to reverse the policy thinking very innovatively. On the contrary Pak-American relations nevr changed, Pak-Russian, there is not even attempt to change, Indo-American relations never changed (Americans wanted, tried, but Indians stuck in socialist mentality kept rejecting the hand), Indo-Pak relations changing, well.. having a colony on moon seems more possible task. There is a big rigidity in outlook everywhere.
OK, coming back to Nobel, not many Russians got it, but they thought they are doing great job and world acknowledged they are doing great job. Have a chat with our academicians in science or social science or engineering and find what they feel about the current state. I can bet you will not find a single guy who is happy about the situation.
People don't get fired up (forget nuclear bomb competition, that remained in two labs) When Russia fired Sputnik in space, Americans revamped the entire syllabi, a big thinking went on in US what is wrong with the current education. In our case, we are perpetually unhappy about current state of affairs. None tries to change or knows what to do.
Lack of innovation. This is what I feel is a defining characteristic of the society. There are surely historical reasons. But turbulent times are the ones which have thrown great thinkers in the world history.
I feel living in subcontinent one faces a different pressure from the media than one sees abroad. Abroad the picture of Asia may be dismal. But the media at home, particularly non-english press tries to portray west as ugly and cruel. So the glitter of west is neither confusing nor troubling the common man. He just does not know west and makes statements like "Ah! those people live like animals they may have sex with their family and very decandent." He talks with firm authority on the west without knowing an inch about what he is talking. Firmly conditioned.
Any search for truth has to start from oposing the authority. All I wanted to point out was that family does not allow or encourage it. You say that society does not encourage it either. I feel they are two sides of the same coin.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled", R. P. Feynman, from his appendix to the Rogers commission report on the Challenger space shuttle disaster.