dispute in inherhitence

[Iconoclast]

Re: dispute in inherhitence

@Paheli00

Why does the mother have a say in what happens with HIS half of the share? The mother should definitely receive her share and do whatever she wants to do with that. There is absolutely no dispute that the dead sister wanted that man to have half of the jewelry. There is 0 doubt about that. That jewelry belonged to that woman…it was her property. She shared her wishes with her sister while alive and trusted that her sister would carry out her wishes. Call it a gift, inheritance whatever…the title doesn’t matter. The bottom line is that the dead sister wanted this man to have half of the jewelry she owned. Why should the mother or anyone else be able to come in now and claim ALL of the jewelry when the rightful owner was very clear about what should happen to the jewelry when she dies?

You are missing the elephant in the room. The deceased married this guy “after” he converted to make this relation Islamic. He converted back “while she was alive” and hid it from her. The deceased sister did not know this, that her marriage Islamically is annulled. That’s FRAUD.
The deceased sister wanted to give him her jewelry, thinking he was islamically still her husband.

At least to me that makes the will obtained frauduently and hence null and void. In which case you need to see what will be her mother’s share if husband has no share.

She may decide to honour her sister by giving something as gift, that gift should come from her own money, not from her mothers share or that of other inheritors, unless they too consent to it.