Discrimination if you eat meat?

Mumbai meat eaters being left out in cold

Joanna Slater
The Wall Street Journal
Oct. 26, 2003 12:00 AM

http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/1026bombay26.html

BOMBAY - Amar Khamkar thought he had found the perfect apartment for his parents in a new building on a quiet lane near his father’s spice shop. He looked at a model apartment and discussed the price with the salesman. Things were looking good until the agent asked, “Is your family vegetarian?”

“I was shocked,” Khamkar, 28, said, sitting behind a pile of dried red chili peppers and jars of chutney in his father’s store. “What did that matter?”

Quite a lot, as it turned out. The agent told Khamkar, who had been raised on fish and chicken, to forget about buying an apartment in the building: For religious reasons, it was reserved for people who don’t eat meat.

Movement growing

A number of buildings, old and new, in the wealthiest precincts of this teeming city of more than 12 million are going vegetarian and are enforcing an unofficial ban on meat eaters. Since cows are sacred to Hindus, most of India’s 1 billion citizens don’t eat beef, but this is far from a nation of vegetarians. Mutton, chicken and fish are eaten in many parts of India. In Bombay, on the west coast, seafood is a favorite, particularly a pungent dried fish whimsically known as Bombay Duck.

In Bombay, however, there is also a small but influential minority of strict vegetarians. Many are prosperous traders, diamond merchants and property developers originally from the neighboring state of Gujarat, home of Mahatma Gandhi and some of India’s most exacting vegetarians. Many are adherents of Jainism, an ancient faith based on the principle of ahimsa, or non-violence. India has about 3.4 million Jains. The observant do not eat meat, eggs or root vegetables, such as onions or carrots, that have been ripped from the soil.

When ancient asceticism meets up with modern real-estate markets, the result can cause heartburn. Cooking smells, for one thing, are an impediment to integration. “On the one hand, you can mix with other people,” says a father of two who lives in a vegetarian building and asked not to be identified. “But if you do, you’re going to have the smell and you can’t stand it.”

Willing to pay extra

Vegetarians are often willing to pay a premium for an environment in harmony with their religious beliefs and no-meat lifestyle. “There’s an excellent market for vegetarian buildings,” said Sunil Bajaj, a Bombay broker who endorses the concept. “It’s as simple as having a non-smoking area. People want pure veg areas, also.”

Sometimes the food fight becomes public. In 2001 when restaurant tycoon Sanjay Narang opened an outlet in Bombay serving meat and vegetable-stuffed Indian breads called parathas, it caused a stink. The fast-food place, called Roti, was on the ground floor of a building where more than 90 percent of the tenants are vegetarian. A Jain temple occupied a prominent place at the rear of the property.

Narang says the residents of the 14-story building would spit and throw pebbles on customers entering the restaurant. They put up banners condemning it for its insensitivity to Jainism and held a demonstration outside blocking the entrance. At one point, the restaurant had a police van sit outside to prevent further incidents. “Of course, a police van outside a restaurant scares even more people away,” Narang said. The number of customers dropped to about 100 a day from 250, and Narang decided to close at the end of last year. It was a “nightmarish experience,” he said.

Pankaj Jhaveri, a Jain and longtime building resident, says the problem was that religious leaders would not visit the temple because of the restaurant. A jewelry merchant by trade, Jhaveri adds that no one forced Narang to shut down and that the new tenant - a coffee shop that does not serve meat - is very popular with people in the building.

And this is discrimination? This is not the government or any institution forcing anyone else out. This is called people expressing and acting on their preferences.

The agent is making it clear BEFORE Mr.Kahmkar bought the house - otherwise imagine how miserable everyone including Mr.Khamkar will be if he bought the house and all his neighbors ostracise him for the smell of fish?

As to Mr.Narang's restaurent - as a good business man shouldn't he have done his diligence before opening in the wrong place?

‘Vegetarian only’ buildings in Mumbai
By: Madhurima Nandy
October 28, 2003

If you think Mumbai is the most cosmopolitan and accommodating Indian city, think again. A new wave of vegetarian-only buildings are coming up across the metropolis, particularly in affluent areas like Bandra, Khar, Nana Chowk, Juhu Scheme and Teen Batti, Walkeshwar.

Many societies in these areas work hard to ensure only vegetarians are allowed to move in. Given the obvious discrimination involved, this is, naturally, a silent movement — there are no written rules forbidding non-vegetarians from buying homes there.

One such society is Madhu Park, an area between Linking Road and SV Road, Khar. It has long had a strict ‘no non-vegetarians’ policy; even the new buildings there stick to the tradition of keeping non-vegetarians away.

In Lakshmi Nagar Housing Society, Madhu Park, the parameters are even stricter — only vegetarian Gujaratis are allowed to live there.

Sunil Singh of Mayfair Housing, which is currently constructing three buildings in Madhu Park, said, “Even in these new buildings, we are not allowed to sell a single flat to a non-vegetarian. Vegetarians from other communities are also not allowed as they are not thought to be true vegetarians.”

Hetal Shah, a resident of Rushabh Apartment near Prarthna Samaj at Nana Chowk, said, “We can’t imagine someone cooking meat in the next flat. We don’t even have any meat shop in the area.”

Hatkesh Society at Juhu Scheme is another vegetarian zone. Most of the people who live here are Marwaris, Gujaratis and Rajasthanis.

In south Mumbai, this issue, once restricted to the Malabar Hill and Walkeshwar area, has now spread to Mumbai Central and Nana Chowk.

Real estate redeveloper Haresh Mehta, who is building three apartment blocks at Nana Chowk, said, “It is a new trend; people like having like-minded neighbours. Old residents of redeveloped projects insisted we do not sell flats to non-vegetarians. Besides, any non-vegetarian would also feel uncomfortable.”

Bijal Vachharajani of the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), a strong advocate of vegetarianism the world over, said the growing trend of going veg is a good thing, “but it is stupid to discriminate in this respect and impose such parameters on buyers”.

Meanwhile, both builders and real estate agents say the central suburbs have so far escaped this form of discrimination.

Apart from Ghatkopar, the central suburbs don’t have any specific vegetarian zones.

New vegetarian apartments

  • Building in Walkeshwar (unnamed)
  • Shiv Tapi, opposite Metro cinema
  • Sankalp, Walkeshwar
  • Dhavalgiri, Nana Chowk
  • Rushabh, Ekadashi and Ram Krupa, near Prarthana Samaj
  • Three buildings in Madhu Park, Khar

http://web.mid-day.com/news/city/2003/october/67283.htm

It would be an excuse to exclude Muslims in cooperative societies in suburbs. Mumbai's suburbs are mostly cosmopolitan.

^ How is that? Are muslims the only non-vegetarians?

I heard that the governement was moving to Ban the killing of cows in India....

Making it Vegan only is a smart way to keep a building Jain/Hindu only....but honestly I don't like hte smell of pork so i can't blame them for not wanting the smell around either.

this program is not govt inspired. when the people dont like something in their locality then it would be wise not to do that.vegetarian muslims would live there n this is not going to be a division agianst religious minorities.
banning cow slaughter is a good cause.when it goes agianst the ethos of others why do people stick on to it claiming faluse notions of religious discrimination.