Difference between true democracy and farce thug democracy

Society Pakistan & World Affairs
, , , ,
1

True democracy and ruler: Person in power takes criticism and reply to questions.

Farce thug democracy and ruler: Person in power could not tolerate criticism and avoid replying to questions, rather, persecute questioners.

Dr Shahid Masood got banned from 15 Aug 2016 onward for 45 days by Pakistani Thug dictator, who is doing everything to make his mega corruptions, lies and nepotism … an accomplish fate of Pakistan.

Unfortunately, it was Dr Shahid Masood who played his role, spreading lies, so that change comes to Pakistan and political thug dictators come to power, without even looking at their past history (even before 1999, these thug political dictators used to persecute journalists, who had very little access anyhow).

These ignorant journalists thought that when Musharraf allowed numerous electronic media, and gave full freedom of speech, no one in future would be able to suppress them or even try to suppress them. But in last 8 years of thug dictators so-called political rule, many channels got banned and many journalists got persecuted.

Anyhow, please look at the video below and think, ponder on the difference between honest democratic person ruling and replying to questions … and … Thug dictators ruling the country using lies and deception, and suppressing any voice of sanity.

Adnan Kaka Khail’s Debate vs Pervez Musharaf - Video Dailymotion

2

Re: Difference between true democracy and farce thug democracy

DR Qayamat Khan Masood is banned because of his criticism on CJ of Sinf High Court on channel 24...

He was earlier warned and fined but the fortune teller Masood carried on...

He did the stunt of getting ban to revive his viewership...nothinh more...

Dont fall for the gossips...

3

Re: Difference between true democracy and farce thug democracy

First of all, he did not criticised SCJ, but let assume that he did, than what? ...

Is it not fact that many Pakistani judges are political appointees and corrupt.
Are judges holy cows?

What about when Media Criticised Ch Iftikhar during Musharraf time, did he banned anyone or took step and wanted to investigate without realizing that Pakistani corrupts would come on road doing bhangra to stop investigation.

Even then, when court stopped investigating corruption of Iftikhar, Musharraf instead of showing ego, reinstated Iftikhar ... but what about Media, did nothing.

Today, thugs in power, they are showing their corrupt and crooked face everywhere, lying and destroying Pakistan, and persecuting anyone they fear, even those who are in Pakistan and want to express themselves on net (social media).

Today's Pakistan is such that, if Nawaz would pick up someone's wife for a night and shoot the husband, he could do that, either directly or would use Punjab police to do his dirty work, and no one could do anything to him neither mention that in media, social media ... and proof is Model town killing.

A country where someone who has millions of followers, in all walk of life, including many in bureaucracy, police, judiciary and armed forces, like TUQ, could not get justice, than who can?

4

Re: Difference between true democracy and farce thug democracy

^^^

Had he got any weight behind his comments against CJ...he would have gone forward to fight his case when he was called for explaination...

But he wanted this ban..reason his dying viewership...

If you say that he is banned because of NS...then Hassan Nisar and others should have been ban.

But in Pakistan...people totally deny the facts..when it comes their personal interest...so lagay raho

5

Re: Difference between true democracy and farce thug democracy

^^^ You have completely ignored what I wrote, just like NS ignores when he is told to explain. :)

I wrote that, SM did not said anything about SCJ that he should have got banned, and even if he had said anything than SCJ should have asked him to give explanation, not PEMRA, but PEMRA today is acting like concubine of PMLN.

Secondly, PEMRA also admits that SM has said nothing about SCJ, but is saying that they (PEMRA or concubine of NS in PEMRA) have perceived that SM has said (PEMRA ko impression milta hay kay SM nay SCJ kay baray may kaha).

Now, how can any state authority act on their perception, other than when authority is misusing their powers.

It is because of such steps, that when people are persecuted by state, making their perception as excuse, or when they do not get justice, than they pick up arms (and it is their right).

6

Re: Difference between true democracy and farce thug democracy

Do not be blind and think:

Just assume that SM really accused SCJ of corruption, what he did not ... and think:

When Naeem Bukhari (a Journalist) wrote letter in media, then Prime Minister, and other authorities, pointing out corruption of then CJ Iftikhar Chaudhary (a handpicked judge by Musharraf), and many media outlets started talking about it, did PEMRA (a regulatory body introduced by Musharraf himself) banned Naeem Bukhari, or President Musharraf initiated SJC to investigate corruption allegation on Iftikhar Chaudhary?

Is it not true than when investigation started, all corrupts and thugs came out on road doing Bhangra to save a corrupt judge, media (including SM) were bought by corrupts to do negative propaganda on that investigation,
and SC judges even stopped 'Supreme Judicial Council', a body over them, from investigation corruption of Iftikhar, resulting in Musharraf reinstating that judge?

Now, can you see the difference between Corrupt Thug dictators ruling Pakistan today, and a democratic person who is labeled as so-called dictator, ruling Pakistan?

7

Re: Difference between true democracy and farce thug democracy

his is the program PEMRA concubine used to silence a voice:

(Program dated 22 June)

Watch the video, especially from 14 min onward … and think, is that a justified reason to silence the voice of SM and than perceiving what SM is saying or implying and about whom? … when in the program, SM clearly said that, such talks are going on among some sectors in Islamabad.

8

Re: Difference between true democracy and farce thug democracy

The difference is that a "real democracy" has had time to evolve and improve, while a "thug democracy" is one which hasnt had the opportunity to mature. With time, the system will improve.

9

Re: Difference between true democracy and farce thug democracy

Thug democracy is still much better than mindless fist waving idiocy from the military.

10

Re: Difference between true democracy and farce thug democracy

Are there any Democracies? Plenty of Corporatocracies.

11

Re: Difference between true democracy and farce thug democracy

History has proved time and again military took over had never solved the problems. It had created more problems in addition to already existed. Your ideal leader is no less thug than NS in minting money. He violated the constitution, killed Akbar Bhugti, involved 12th May 2007 carnage, made a number of houses in and out of the country using looted money. He is absconder, courts had ordered confiscation of his properties, issued non bailable warrant of arrest, involved in BB’s murder, issued NRO in saving thousands of target killers and hard core criminals of mqm, hiding OBL this list goes on and on. Your justification is not credible.

Yes these wardi walas sponsored such stupid dramas to make fool of public. Many unwanted generalists were killed during wardi walas times, not just banned by PEMRA. No one knows who killed them!!