Devils advocate.

This is how wikipedia defines it.
In common parlance, a devil’s advocate is someone who takes a position for the sake of argument. This process can be used to test the quality of the original argument and identify weaknesses in its structure.

Sometimes I play dumb instead of playing devil’s advocate sometime I do play devil’s advocate , it depends on the situation. If the person I am arguing with is someone I have to be very respectful I will play dumb instead of being devil’s advocate.

Do you play devil’s advocate sometimes ?
Do you hate people who play devil’s advocate ?

Re: Devils advocate.

<<devil …

whos ma advocate ? :aq:

Re: Devils advocate.

Sunny can advocate U cadet :D

Re: Devils advocate.

who is sunny :chai:

Re: Devils advocate.

Ur Ham'Zaat.. :@:

Re: Devils advocate.

then he must be devil too .......
:D

Re: Devils advocate.

jee.. he surely is a devil.. warna wo advocate thori na hota.. :)

Re: Devils advocate.

dont believe in wickedpedia
its basically a global blog with people writing whatever they want to write
zero credibility

:chai:

Re: Devils advocate.

its not always wrong.. credibility cant be zero.. :ASA:

Re: Devils advocate.

You have other sources to verify wikipedia articles and you can also dispute it if you have credible evidence.
Anyway go back to my original questions.
Do you play devil’s advocate sometimes ?
Do you hate people who play devil’s advocate ?