Determination and Dedication = Development and Progress

Amongst those running the country, it is not greed (as what drives politicians in third world) but determination and dedication (as what derives patriotic individuals) can only develop and give progress to a nation.

From American site: Despardes
H t t p :// www . despardes . com /FEATURES/jun04/who-is-shaukat-aziz-jun28.htm

It seems that the article was written in June 2004 (see the URL address that mentions jun04. Mentioning of Shaukat Aziz age (54 - he was born in 1949) and issuance of 500 billion dollars bond (that was issued in Feb 2004) confirms that.

We should realise that good managers (weather for running a country or a company) are the one that finds a good team and work dedicatedly to bring success to what they are managing, not the one that waste time and cheat trust to ruin what they are managing for personal gains. Please read about the determinations of people managing Pakistan and ponder on where their determinations are leading Pakistan today. Here is one. I found it a nice read and I am sure that many others would do so too. Hence, I am putting it here.

Who is Shaukat Aziz?

  How Pakistan's Finance Minister Shaukat Aziz revived Pakistan's economy from the depths to which it had fallen and got it back on the map of world's economy.

Just before nine every morning, a 10-year-old, beat-up Toyota flying a small green and white flag makes a five minute journey from the heavily-guarded Ministerial Enclave at the foothills of Margalla in Islamabad to the nearby Q Block, otherwise known as the Ministry of Finance. The car normally stays put near the ministry driveway until after 9pm, six days a week, until it makes the short journey back to the residential enclave. “There is no lunch break for me, no half-day [on] Saturdays,” says Shaukat Aziz, 54, Pakistan’s Finance Minister. By his own admission, he is a man in a hurry. “I came here to do volunteer national service so I am trying to get as much done in as little time.”

Until four years ago, Shaukat was the globe-trotting head of Citigroup (Citi)’s global private bank in New York with an office on Park Avenue and a million-dollar apartment not far away overlooking New York’s Central Park.

Now, it’s the beat-up Toyota, 13-hour workdays six days a week, no million-dollar salary or zooming stock options, and a small town house in a government enclave in Islamabad. “After 29 years as an expatriate high-flying banker in 10 countries, I decided it was better to do a few years of volunteer national service,” he told Asia Inc in a recent interview.

“ He is a guy who leads by example and who works tirelessly to achieve his goals,” says Ashfaque Hassan Khan, economic adviser to the Ministry of Finance who has worked closely with Shaukat over the past four years. “He is very passionate about things and a very driven person.”

Fellow Cabinet minister Owais Ahmed Leghari says: “Shaukat has brought with him years of private-sector experience and professionalism you’d expect from someone who has worked as a senior executive of a multinational in 10 countries.” Last month, Shaukat and Pakistan’s central bank chief Ishrat Hussain, a former Asia-Pacific chief economist for the World Bank, travelled to global financial capitals as part of a road show to sell US$500 million worth of bonds — Pakistan’s first in nearly seven years. “Our credit rating is now on a par with or higher than Indonesia and the Philippines, and sovereign bonds were priced tighter than recent similar issues from Thailand,” says Shaukat.
The bond issue was a roaring success, attracting nearly US$2 billion. “The investment banker in me says we’ve almost arrived,” says Shaukat. “Investors are saying: We are willing to buy your story.”

Mending the Pakistan economy with band-aid was the easy part. Now, says Shaukat, the hard part begins: How to attract long-term investments, build infrastructure and put in place a system that will allow the economy to grow at a sustainable 6% to 7% a year for the next five to 10 years and tackle issues like poverty. Suddenly, South Asia, once written off as a lost cause, is the hottest region in Asia. It isn’t just India with its burgeoning software and business process outsourcing sectors or Bangladesh and Sri Lanka with their own economic revival and growth of 5% to 8% per year — Pakistan too is on a roll. Four years after the military coup that ousted the elected government of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif and put General Pervez Musharraf in power, Pakistan will chalk up 6% growth in the fiscal year ending June, and private-sector economists are projecting 6-plus % growth for fiscal year starting July.

“ I think once we have all the growth drivers in place within the next year or two, we can actually look forward to even higher growth like 7% or 8% that most Asian countries enjoyed in the ‘80s and ‘90s,” says Shaukat.

Shaukat Aziz is an odd person to lead Pakistan’s slow climb on the recovery trail. Son of a former Pakistani diplomat, Shaukat grew up in Karachi and joined Citibank in Karachi as a trainee at the age of 21. “I was just out of business school and they sent me to Philippines for training.” At 24, he found himself as country manager for Citibank in Jordan. From Amman, he headed first to Athens in Greece as Citi’s regional head, then on to New York where he worked in the back office overseeing processing for Asia. In 1982, he arrived in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, as Citibank chief country officer. By 1984, he had left Malaysia to head up Saudi American Bank, then an affiliate of Citibank in Saudi Arabia.
It was in Saudi Arabia that he met and networked with the members of the Saudi royal family. Among the people he got to know fairly well was Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal of Saudi Arabia, currently the world’s fifth-richest man.

By 1991, when Shaukat had moved to London as head of Middle Eastern business, Citibank was reeling under tens of billions of bad loans in Latin America. Its stock price plunged and the US Federal Reserve wondered how a global giant like Citi could be saved from disaster. The failure of Citi would have ripple effects throughout the banking world. To save the bank, Citi’s then CEO John Reed put together a massive restructuring plan that included a rights issue that would inject several billion dollars of new equity into the holding company then called Citicorp. A bad stock market and reeling economy just kept derailing Citi’s restructuring. In the end, Reed sent his troops around the world to tap wealthy individuals who might be willing to bet on Citi’s revival.

Enter Prince Al-Waleed, who injected nearly US$600 million into Citicorp. The legend goes that a bunch of Citibankers had convinced the Prince that it was the best bet he’d ever make. Among them: Shaukat Aziz, who had known Al-Waleed as a friend and client for years. “I think my role in convincing Prince Al-Waleed has been exaggerated but I did play a role along with a couple of other Citibank veterans like Paul Collins and Rick Grant.” The rights issue was a success and Citi stock zoomed from under US$10 a share to nearly US$100 a share at its height (before its merger with Travelers Group to form the current Citigroup).

Al-Waleed sold a lot of his stock early but he still made billions from his investments. He remains a large Citi shareholder and his remaining Citi shares are reportedly worth US$3.5 billion at current prices.

Citi’s legend and gossip mill has it that after the Al-Waleed deal, Reed called Shaukat to say he could have any job he wanted, something Shaukat vehemently denies. “My meteoric rise at Citi had absolutely nothing to do with the Al-Waleed deal. Citi’s culture doesn’t reward one deal. I had a long track record at Citi which got me to where I was when I quit to join the [Pakistan] government.”

After a stint as head of Asia-Pacific corporate and investment banking in Singapore, Shaukat moved to New York in early 1996 to become Citi’s chief planning officer, answering directly to chairman and CEO Reed. In 1997, he moved to head Citi’s global private bank, the third-largest private bank in the world. In the mid-1990s, at a retreat for top Citi executives, Reed pointed to three or four men who he thought had CEO material in them: Shaukat was one of the four names, says one Citi insider.

By the time Musharraf summoned Shaukat to Islamabad and asked him whether he would take up the challenge of mending Pakistan’s economy, the country was not only under economic sanctions and a pariah state, but Reed was on his way out of Citi following his standoff with co-chairman Sandy Weill.

Shaukat denies that he left Citi because his mentor was on his way out. Pakistan needed an economic saviour and Shaukat was just the right man for the job. By end-1999, Pakistan’s balance-of-payments position was precarious — it had sufficient foreign reserves to cover less than two weeks of imports and runaway foreign debt at US$38 billion, of which nearly a third was short-term debt. Pakistan was on the verge of defaulting on some of its foreign debt.

On taking power, Musharraf asked senior advisers who was the most qualified, incorruptible Pakistani whom he could task with turning the country’s economy around. He was told that among the top echelons of Citi in New York, a Pakistani banker had been identified as a potential CEO by its then co-chairman John Reed. But getting him to come home and take the job of Finance Minister would probably be next to impossible.

Musharraf, a former commando who knew something about undertaking near-impossible tasks, told his aides that night to get Shaukat on the phone right away. For his part, Shaukat had never even heard of Musharraf until he was invited to help rescue Pakistan’s faltering economy. “The first time I heard General Musharraf’s name was when I saw him on CNN after the military coup in October 1999,” recalls Shaukat. “I remember thinking: another military coup in Pakistan, another general.”

Next morning, the phone rang in his Park Avenue office at Citi. Musharraf’s secretary was on the line saying the new military leader wanted to meet with him. So he flew to Islamabad that weekend. “We talked for an hour or so mainly about what he was going to do following the coup.” Pakistan was bankrupt, with foreign reserves down to almost nothing. There were economic sanctions following the 1998 nuclear tests and political sanctions after the coup. “General Musharraf asked for my advice on how he could put the country’s economic house in order,” recalls Shaukat. “One thing led to the other and I was invited to join his Cabinet as Finance Minister.”

What followed was days of agonising over whether he should take the offer. Shaukat talked at length with his wife and his mentor and boss Reed. “Until then, I had been an expatriate armchair critic of Pakistan but had always felt that the country probably had a lot more potential than what it got credit for. I had always felt that if it was run a little better, it wasn’t that difficult to produce results in Pakistan.” After a few days of agonising over the offer, he decided to take the job. He took leave of absence as head of Citigroup’s global private bank and asked his wife to call in the packers. Just before New Year’s eve in 1999 as the new millennium dawned, Shaukat arrived in Islamabad to take over as Finance Minister.

Moving from the private sector in New York to a minister’s desk in Islamabad was a huge leap. “Some of my friends and colleagues thought it was foolish of me to leave a promising career at Citigroup and become Finance Minister of a country that was a political and economic pariah with all sorts of political and economic sanctions,” he recalls. “Others thought I should go back and do the national service. But really, the more I thought of it, the more I realised it was a great challenge. How many people are asked to become Finance Minister of their country and to help save their country from economic ruin?”

Shaukat says he tackled three or four basic things to put in place a platform for sustainable growth. “First, we tackled our precarious balance-of-payments problem. Foreign reserves have gone up from the equivalent of two weeks of imports at the end of 1999 to just over US$12 billion, which is almost 12 months or 50 weeks of imports.”

The second was to reorganise Pakistan’s debts. From about US$38.5 billion, Pakistan’s total foreign debts are now down to just over US$34.5 billion. “We have almost no short-term debt and we recently pre-paid Asian Development Bank 14 loans amounting to US$1.17 billion,” he says. This was expensive debt which was due for payment between 2009 and 2019.

The pre-payment would save Pakistan some US$300 million in future interest payments since the loans carried high interest rates of 8% to 11%. “Before the end of the year, we expect to pre-pay another US$1 billion to US$1.5 billion in international debt,” says Shaukat. That will bring the total stock of foreign liabilities down to around US$33 billion. “Our plan is to pre-pay another US$3 billion or so of US$4.5 billion in expensive foreign debt by 2007,” he adds.

The next thing he tackled was the burgeoning budget deficit. “When I took over, local economists told me not to worry about deficits and just borrow and grow your way through it. As a banker, I knew borrowing for growing wasn’t a great strategy when 50% of Pakistan’s total revenues went to debt servicing,” says Shaukat. The fiscal deficit has come down from 8% to just 4% this year. “We want to bring the deficit down further to a more manageable 2% to 3% of the GDP,” he adds.

Inflation is down from double digits to about 2%. Pakistan has also undertaken structural reforms and a massive privatisation programme and focused on putting proper drivers of growth in place. The results have been nothing short of spectacular. The Karachi Stock Exchange index is up 300% since Musharraf took over, and property markets in key cities like Lahore, Karachi and Islamabad are on a tear. “Low interest rates and deregulation have freed up money for housing finance that’s behind the housing boom. Cheap consumer credit is helping boost consumption,” says Shaukat.

Another thing driving the economy is burgeoning foreign-exchange inflows from overseas Pakistanis. Last year, overseas Pakistanis sent US$4.24 billion home. Shahid Javed Burki, a former Pakistani Finance Minister and senior World Bank official who is now a director with investment company Emerging Markets Partnership in Washington, DC, says: “Pakistan can easily raise remittances from its overseas workers to US$6 billion or US$7 billion in a couple of years.”

Moreover, deregulation and better market access have lifted exports to US$12 billion a year. Some US$5 billion has been invested in new machinery to upgrade the textile sector in the last two years. “Once the global textile quotas and walls come down in December, our textile exports are going to go one way — up,” says Shaukat.

But his critics say he and Musharraf have just been lucky. In a recent telephone interview from her home in exile in London, former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto, who heads the Pakistan People’s Party, the country’s second-largest political group in the parliament, told Asia Inc that Pakistan’s “economy has indeed turned around from the depths it had fallen [to] in the final days under [former Prime Minister] Nawaz Sharif”. But Bhutto says “most of the improvements have been due to Pakistan’s emergence as a key ally of the West in the aftermath of Sept 11, which has resulted in enormous handouts”.

She says “huge increases in foreign exchange reserves are just a mirage because of all the extraneous factors. Musharraf has been lucky because of Sept 11 and Osama bin Laden. Short-term foreign loans were rescheduled, there was debt forgiveness, increased foreign aid, the blocking of unofficial money-transfer channels like the hawala and hundi systems, which means remittances of overseas Pakistani go mostly through official channels”. Moreover, says Bhutto, “the international climate has led to insecurity among Pakistan’s affluent expatriates who are now repatriating more money as a nest egg back home. Without these factors, the reserves might be half what they are now”.

Still, even Bhutto grudgingly concedes that Shaukat has transformed things. She says: “I know Shaukat Aziz personally and a lot of other expatriate technocrats who were lured back by Musharraf to do national service. I will concede that they are a very talented bunch of people and they have a good reputation overseas. So far, they have not been tainted by any scandals. But do they have the ability to speak up and say no when Musharraf needs more money for some unexplained military expenditure? No. They are just henchmen who are at his beck and call.” Bhutto says “a real economic turnaround can only follow when internal drivers of growth are in place, [but] they are not. Sure, there is a property bubble in Pakistan and the stock market has tripled or quadrupled since Sept 11 but under Musharraf, the unemployment rate has risen and the latest UNDP [United Nations Development Programme] report says poverty has increased. Yes, we have huge foreign funds coming in to prop up a military regime that claims to be the bulwark of moderate Islam in the region but those funds are not going into the social sector where they are needed most”.

For his part, Shaukat says he’d rather not get into a slanging match with Bhutto. “She is a politician who has the right to say what she wants. She had two terms in office and what did she have to show for it?” He concedes that the events of Sept 11 have helped swing the tide in favour of Pakistan. “After Sept 11, Pakistan found itself as a frontline state and under the microscope of the world,” he says. “We have used that visibility to put our own house in order. Clearly, we have had help from the US as well as other developed countries that have extended aid but unless you have your house in order, a little bit of aid will not filter down and have the impact you would want it to have.”

Pondering what he has gone through in the past four years, Shaukat says he couldn’t have done what he has been able to do without the backing of Musharraf. “As I worked with him and got to know him well, I realised that President Musharraf is a very smart, sharp guy. Moreover, he is very driven and goal-oriented. If he wasn’t an army general in Pakistan and had been born in the US, he probably would have made a good CEO.” Musharraf has picked a good team and let them get on with the job.

He picked Shaukat as Finance Minister and brought the World Bank’s chief economist for Asia-Pacific, Ishrat Hussain, in as governor of State Bank, Pakistan’s central bank. “Being a general, economics wasn’t his strong point but he’d call me and other officials and sit with us until 2am and grill us about basic economic concepts,” says Shaukat. “He’d ask us: How can we get our foreign-exchange reserves up? How do we balance the budget or keep deficits low? Here was a man who didn’t mind admitting that he didn’t understand some of these complex matters but he was clear that he wanted to do what it took to meet certain goals.”

Shaukat says that with privatisation picking up pace, Pakistan is now set to move into the second phase of structural reforms. Analysts expect the country to raise US$2 billion from privatisation this year and a similar amount next year. Foreign investments, which were down to a trickle, are now running at nearly US$1 billion a year.

The Finance Minister says his biggest obstacle has been trying to fight vested interests. “Nobody likes change and I was convinced from the first day that we had to change everything, starting from the mindset, if we were to produce results.” It wasn’t anything that Shaukat or Musharraf was trying to do. “Human nature is opposed to change. We could have taken the easy way out, not ruffled any feathers but we would have improved things only marginally. We had to reinvent the wheel to take Pakistan to a different level. It has taken us a little longer than expected but in four years, the results are there to see. Pakistan has come a long way.”

But Shaukat admits there is still a long way to go. GDP per capita will rise to US$600 during the current fiscal year ending June but he is aiming to get it to above the US$1,000 level. Nearly 30% of the population lives below the poverty line and Shaukat says Pakistan needs faster growth to keep poverty levels low. “I think we can easily exceed the 6% growth next year and the year after and, over the next three to five years, we can achieve a steady 5% to 7% growth because the manufacturing sector is growing, global textile quotas are on the way out and with the buoyant property market, we have the construction sector booming.” But even he concedes “there are areas like human development where we haven’t been successful. We need to spend more on education, training and improving our infrastructure, if we are to successfully compete with our peers”.

What’s next? Shaukat says his job isn’t done yet. He won’t give a date but says if Musharraf wants him around, he’d like to stick around for a few more years. Will he return to the private sector as CEO of an Asian or multinational bank in, say, four or five years? “I haven’t thought about that because right now, I am busy trying to turn around the economy,” he says. But clearly, for a 54-year-old, permanent retirement at, say, 58 is not on the cards. “I will be bored, so I’d probably do something,” he adds.

Some Pakistani newspapers and magazines have talked about him as a future Prime Minister. “Oh no, please, no,” he pleads. “I have no political ambitions whatsoever. I came here to do voluntary national service for a few years.” Nothing less, nothing more. When he finally does give up that beat-up Toyota for a limo, Pakistan’s loss will probably be some global bank’s gain.

Re: Determination and Dedication = Development and Progress

Appointing Shaukat Aziz as Prime Minister was one of the best decisions President Musharraf ever made. :k:

Re: Determination and Dedication = Development and Progress

I only read partial of it, but going from US high profile position to a fully political position in a government institution in Pakistan was really a big big move for him, I am glad that there are Pakistanis at that level who are willing to contribute :k:

Re: Determination and Dedication = Development and Progress

Shaukat Aziz is a shining example of NRPs making it big in the Western system. I wish all of the NRPs make people like him as their role model and achieve the highest possible positions in the West.

You will see that such bright indviduals will bring back so much in terms of contacts and knowldege.

Re: Determination and Dedication = Development and Progress

^
That is what I was thinking as that struck me most. I know a bit of corporate culture and amongst all corporate cultures, banking is the most lucrative. Executive of big western banks literally live like Kings of blessed land. To leave such job and position is very difficult especially for a country where most are selfish and work for themselves rather then care for the country. I know many who would not even going to leave ordinary job in west to serve in Pakistan. Just imagine a successful medical doctor working in British hospital as consultant (earning around 125000 pounds a year) or American hospital as surgeon (earning 300000 dollars a year) leave his job to work as professor (grade 20) in government medical university on grade 20 pay scale [around 4000 dollars a year (Rs 20,000 a month) plus accommodation].

[Actually, I have come across many Pakistanis who left a good job in Pakistan (skill jobs, what Pakistan needs for development) to become taxi driver, security guard, salesperson, machine operator or restaurant waiter in west]

A bank executive at the level of Shaukat Aziz must easily be earning few million dollars a year (7 digit salary) and then leave it all to work as finance minister in a bankrupt country like Pakistan (that is what it was at that time) on something like less then 4000 dollars a year (plus accommodation). Actually, what I have heard, he was not even drawing any salary and on top of that, he was spending all expenses related to job from his own pocket (even airfares).

One can easily judge his position in city bank by reading the report given to American senate by American banking regulatory body for changing American law regarding banking. This report also mentions King and Queen of corrupt (aka AAZ and BB) as their case was one of four mentioned cases in the report (it is second case in the report). [Note: this report is nothing to do with Pakistan but it is internal matter of American senate, where senate briefed by banking regulators on how notorious corrupts like AAZ and BB (plus others) are using American banks to laundry their corruption money and that American banking laws need tightening].

h t t p : / / www . U.S. Senate](U.S. Senate: 404 Error Page)

Four case histories in the report regarding notoriously corrupt public figures are:

(1) Raul Salinas Case History

(2) Asif Ali Zardari Case History

[Just how embarrassment this disgusting person Zardari and his wife B. Bhutto bring to the name of Pakistan is unimaginable. Zardari case is somewhere from middle section onward of the report]

(3) El Hadj Omar Bongo Case History

(4) Abacha Sons Case History

**Shaukat Aziz name is also there in this report [Making Pakistan proud to have someone there in respectable and trustworthy position, unlike Zaradri and Bhutto names in the same report, embarrassing Pakistan]. **Here what the report says about him (extract from the report by banking regulators to American senate):

**Senior Bank Management Oversight. **Poor audit results, ongoing regulatory reviews, and the Salinas and Zardari scandals elevated the private bank’s problems to the attention of Citibank’s senior management. The Chairman of the Audit Committee of Citibank’s Board of Directors, Robert Shapiro, an outside director who is also chief executive officer of Monsanto, told the Subcommittee staff that, during his tenure as committee chairman from 1996 until 1998, the private bank became one of a handful of issues he focused on. He said that he was troubled not only by the repeated low audit scores, but also by the private bank’s repeated failure to meet deadlines for corrective action. He said that he personally talked to Citicorp’s CEO John Reed about the need to take action. He said that Mr. Reed responded by taking a personal interest in addressing the private bank problems.

Among other actions, in May 1997, Mr. Reed replaced the head of the private bank. He selected Shaukat Aziz, a longtime Citibank executive not previously associated with the private bank. He told the Subcommittee staff that he charged Mr. Aziz with improving what Mr. Reed called the private bank’s “lousy audits.” He indicated that he also asked Mr. Aziz to review the private bank’s handling of public figures accounts, and to initiate the “fundamental review” of the private bank requested by bank regulators. In a November 1997 letter to the Board of Directors, Mr. Reed wrote the following:

“I spent a day being interviewed by the Department of Justice on the Salinas affair. As a legal issue, I continue to think that we are on very solid ground. However, I am more than ever convinced that we have to rethink and reposition the Private Banking business. … Much of our practice that used to make good sense is now a liability. We live in a world where we have to worry about ‘how someone made his/her money’ which did not used to be an issue. Much that we had done to keep Private Banking private becomes ‘wrong’ in the current environment. The business itself is very highly attractive and there is no reason why we cannot pursue it in a sound way but it will take an adjustment.” [CS7463]

   That adjustment apparently has not been a smooth one and is still underway. In July 1998, Mr. Aziz presented a new private bank strategy to the Citibank Audit Committee, recommending among other measures that the bank move away from "secrecy" and instead emphasize producing good investment returns for its clients. He also recommended taking steps to change the private bank's culture of lax internal controls. These controls were a sensitive matter throughout 1998, not only because of the Carlos Gomez fraud in January, but also because, in May 1998, ten days after Citibank had agreed to purchase Banca Confia in Mexico, that Mexican bank was indicted by the United States Justice Department for engaging in money laundering. 

After receiving approval of the Audit Committee and senior bank management of the proposed 1998 strategy, Mr. Aziz began making personnel changes at the private bank, including firing a longtime senior manager in Switzerland, Phillipe Holderbeke, and altering the private bank’s leadership team. On the issue of public figure accounts, in late 1998 and early 1999, over the objection of some longterm private bank employees, he ordered a number of longstanding public figure accounts to be closed.

In October 1999, after accepting an appointment as finance minister of Pakistan, his home country, Mr. Aziz left the private bank. He was replaced by Todd Thomson, a former Travelers Group executive.

Just look at NS, AAZ, BB who think that they are born to rule Pakistan and Pakistanis are born to serve them as royals. When they rule the country, they think that they are doing favour to the country (by letting the country serve them with whatever country has). Religious parties are worse culprits. Their thinking is that Pakistan is their jageer and that they have right to impose their thoughts (understanding of Islam) on other Pakistanis (they even want to rule Pakistanis thoughts).

To me A Q Khan, who was working and living in the richest country of the world (much richer then USA) on a well paid job left to serve Pakistan when Pakistan had little to offer in any way, financially or name (at that time he started working for Pakistan for less then Rs 1000/= a month job). This in spite of his wife being European and with European wife, it is much harder to move back. After that, Shaukat Aziz seems to be such person that left a highly paid job to serve the country in this way. Actually, there are many more but not so recognized, deserve lot of appreciation. Still, knowing many people working in west, this personal sacrifice for the country (Pakistan) amongst them is rare.

Re: Determination and Dedication = Development and Progress

:k: