Details of interpreting verses from the Qur'an and obvious blunders

[psyah]

Re: Details of interpreting verses from the Qur’an and obvious blunders

@Mr.Popat

Buddy!!
how is it ‘really really pointless’ ?? Allah says they both used to eat food. What does that tell you??? He (a.s) is no longer eating. Who does not eat dies !! where is the rocket science in this ?? Jesus a.s also was a messenger like others, and just like others have passed away , so did He ( as stated in the verse ). Tell me how is this pointless?

You are to live forever once you DIE!. You are making a joke out of yourself here. On Earth, whoever is living creature MUST die!

You say we do not share same aqeedah! .. yeah you know what? we really dont. You come up with your aqeedah based on what your mullahs tell you.. without even confirming from Qur’an, whereas i’m here talking on the basis of Quran. Aqeedah should be in accordance to Quran and ahadith!

So, talk to me !! I cannot let this thing go ! You are making up stuff. You are contradicting Quran and your aqeedah. Make your aqeedah in accordance to Quran rather than interpret Quran based on your aqeedah. That is very sad !

You are telling me Allah says that therein shall you live , and then you are telling me if allah does not have the power to keep human alive without food outside of Earth ? Really? Go ask your scholars why your own explanation contradict what Allah says in Quran.

Peace Mr.Popat

The verse does not say “they used to eat” - you are making this up … this is what I mean by interpretation blunders …

Now listen carefully:

a) If Allah (SWT) so Wills He can keep any living creature alive without food
b) The Qur’an does not say “they used to eat” and therefore you cannot conclude “they, either or both are not eating now”
c) The Qur’an specifically says “they were eating” - now if you understood grammar you will understand the difference between “they were eating” and “they used to eat” … one is past tense, the other is past-perfect tense … these are very different in Arabic just like in English … you cannot confuse the two … One means something happened in the past, but may or may not be happening now, the other means it happened then and is not happening now.

d) This verse could have spoken about death, but it didn’t it spoke about eating …
e) Eating itself is a non-Divine Attribute - you don’t need anything else to say … if anything eats it is not Divine … and certainly cannot conclude further they are both dead …

I am currently alive - but I eat .. now I am mortal not because I am dead, it can be argued because I will eventually die, but the reason enough is that I eat … It is not befitting for God to eat … nor does He require it.