Destroying Pakistan to Make It Safe

Such contrast news creates shockwaves and shivering that what is actually happening in the country. Will the tragedy of 1971 again be repeated? Is it true that military is bent on killing its own people for sake for $s from Uncle Sam.

Eric Margolis &#151 FOREIGN CORRESPONDENT
18 May 2009

Destroying Pakistan to Make It Safe

PARIS ¬ The US keeps kicking hornet’s nests around the globe and wondering why it continues getting stung.

**The latest example: Pakistan’s once beautiful Swat Valley has been turned into a battlefield. Last week, Pakistan finally bowed to Washington’s angry demands to unleash its military against rebellious Pashtun tribesmen of Northwest Frontier Province(NWFP) ¬ who are collectively mislabeled `Taliban’ in the west. They are not the Afghan Taliban, but it’s convenient for the western media and Pentagon to slap that label on them. **

**The Obama administration had threatened to stop $1.2 billion annual cash payments to bankrupt Pakistan’s political and military leadership, and block $5.5 billion future aid, unless Islamabad sent its soldiers into Pakistan’s turbulent NWFP along the Afghan frontier and crushed attempts to re-establish Islamic Law and autonomy. Many people in the region want Islamic law because in utterly corrupt Pakistan it represents the only honest and swift judicial system. The only other `law’ available has to be bought. **

**Pakistan’s army and air force claimed to have killed 1,000 `terrorists’ (read: mostly civilians) and almost emptied the valley of its inhabitants. UN sources now say the operation has created close to 2 million refugees. **
**Pakistan’s armed forces, who are being paid by the US to fight Pashtun tribes, have scored a brilliant victory against their own people. Too bad Pakistan’s military does not manage to do as well in wars against India. Blasting civilians at home, however, is much safer and more profitable. **

**Unable to pacify Afghanistan’s Pashtun tribes (again, lumped together as `Taliban’), a deeply frustrated Washington has begun tearing Pakistan apart in an effort to end Pashtun resistance in both nations. CIA drone aircraft have so far killed over 700 Pakistani Pashtun. Only 6% were militants, according to Pakistan’s media, the rest civilians. **

Pashtun, also improperly called Pathan, are the world’s largest tribal people. Fifteen million live in Afghanistan, forming half its population. Twenty-six million live right across the border in Pakistan. Up to three million Afghan Pashtun are refugees in Pakistan.

**True to their strategy of divide and rule, Britain’s imperialists split the Pashtun by an artificial border, the Durand Line (which became today’s Afghan-Pak border). Pashtun reject this artificial border. **

**Many Pashtun tribes agreed to join Pakistan in 1947 provided much of their homeland remain autonomous and free of government troops. Pashtun Swat, where Islamic Sharia law was in force, only joined Pakistan in 1969 after assurances of autonomy and religious freedom. **

**As Pakistan’s Pashtun increasingly aided Pashtun resistance in Afghanistan, US `Predator’ drones began attacking them. Washington forced Islamabad to violate its own constitution by sending troops into Pashtun lands. The result was the current explosion of Pashtun anger. **

I have been to war with Pashtun and have seen their legendary courage, strong sense of honor, and determination. They are also hugely quarrelsome, feuding, prickly, and notorious for seeking revenge. . One learns never threaten a Pashtun or give him ultimatums. These mountain warriors defied the US by refusing to hand over Osama bin Laden because he was a hero of the anti-Soviet war and their guest. Doing would have violated their ancient code of `Pashtunwali’ that still guides them.

**Now, Washington’s ham-handed policies and last week’s Swat atrocity threaten to ignite Pakistan’s second worst nightmare after invasion by India: that its 26 million Pashtun will secede and join Afghanistan’s Pashtun to form an independent Pashtun state, Pashtunistan. **

**This would rend Pakistan asunder, probably provoke its restive Baluchi tribes to secede, and might tempt mighty India to intervene military, risking nuclear war with beleaguered Pakistan. **

**The Pashtun of Northwest Frontier have no intention or capability of moving into Pakistan’s other provinces, Punjab, Sindh and Baluchistan. They just want to be left alone. Alarms of a `Taliban takeover of Pakistan’ are driven by ignorance or propaganda. **

Lowland Pakistanis have repeatedly rejected militant Islamic parties. Many have little love for Pashtun, whom they regard as mountain rustics best avoided. Pakistan’s Islamist parties have traditionally won less than 10% of the national vote.

Nor are Pakistan’s well-guarded nuclear weapons a danger ¬ at least not yet. Alarms about Pakistan’s nukes come from neoconservative fabricators worried about Israel.

**The real danger is in the US acting like an enraged mastodon, trampling Pakistan under foot, and forcing Islamabad’s military to make war on its own people. Pakistan could end up like US-occupied Iraq, split into three parts and helpless. **
**If this continues, at some point nationalistic Pakistani soldiers may rebel against the corrupt generals and politicians on Washington’s payroll. **

Equally ominous, a poor people’s uprising spreading across Pakistan ¬ also mislabeled `Taliban’ - threatens a radical national rebellion similar to India’s spreading Maoist Naxalite rebellion.

Re: Destroying Pakistan to Make It Safe

Its simple, zardari ko paisey do aur pakistan ka bajja bajayo...

Spock, I don't agree with you here. Do you think NS would have made the difference? Not at all. woh sirf turup ka patta hay, uncle sam key leaay. All these key decisions are still taken by the top brass of military not by Zardari. Military jab chaahay Zardari ka bajja bajja degi....

jab political settlement Taliban ke saath ho gaya tha to phir military action ki kya zaroorat thi. aor haan, ab kuch arsay se, suicidal bombing main bhi kami aagai hay.

That article reflects that who is actually in power and who makes such key decisions. Definitely not by sham democracy or corrupt judicial system.

Re: Destroying Pakistan to Make It Safe

Eric Margolis is still longing for the days when he used to be ISI's favorite gora (after Charlie Wilson) and was compensated heavily for his services to jihad movement.

First, they call themselves Taliban, so if "western media" is calling them Taliban then it isn't much wrong, except these are TTP (+TNSM).

US is using carrot/stick approach to what they think is the solution (or route to the solution they have in their mind ;) ). However, Pakistani government wasn't doing much to stop the militant take-overs, creeping into other cities and what not. What was our govt/military doing to stop it? Or was it okay for militants to take over the country?

So who was taking over Swat? Buner? Were they not 'militants'?

Finally something I can agree with author.

Re: Destroying Pakistan to Make It Safe

knowing that no country, including US, would dare to attack pakistan head on, president musharraf sealed pakistan fate by starting a civil war in oct 2001

thats where the need for tribal people to go against the government and army came from. that was the ghadarri of a brown sahib

america could have easily fought in afghanistan without pakistan joining in. pakistan should have declared neutrality.

but many of you guys wanted the state to fight the taliban, as you do today, so go ahead fight the taliban.

Are you saying the Talibans we are fighting today are the same one who ran away from Afghanistan? And also they are sincere with Pakistani awam?

no, im saying its the people who saw the deception and deceitfulness of what pakistan did to the taliban of afghanistan.

its not just pak awam effected, theres other awams. they are under no obligation to be 'sincere to pak awam' especially if your not sincere to their awam. and the fact of the matter is that you are not sincere

one of my favourite tv analysts says the ttp are working for the americans/indians/zionists but who is the pak army and government working for?

im no taliban supporter but i clearly see the wrongs of the war against them which started in 2001. today we are faced with offshoots of that same war.

There is a reason US is begging Pakistan to stop supporting Taliban, right? Which Taliban do you think they are talking about? Where does deception/deceitfullness fit in that equation? Yes Pakistan did make a u-turn (an official one that is).

Re: Destroying Pakistan to Make It Safe

the doubt in fringe eliments needs to be addressed. pakistanis need to console the bearded fatayans and not talk of talibanisation - which suggests hate and discrimination.

lately zardari has been so balatantly prancing around with the begging bowl that this appears to be a succinct description. his whole energy seemed to be focused on how much for this military action and how much for that one.