DEOBANDI-WAHABI-NAQSHBANDI ALLIANCE:

Note: For serious discussion only.

Deoband is in district Saharanpur in the Uttar Pradesh province of India. The Darul Uloom seminary established here in 1879 by Maulan Abul Qasim Nanotvi concentrated on the instruction of the Quran, realigning the mystically inclined Muslim population with the basic teachings of Islam.

Deobandi scholars adopted Shah Waliullah (1703-1762) as their spiritual patron. Shah Waliullah is probably the most revered Islamic thinker among the Muslims of South Asia and Afghanistan. His ability to interpret the Quran and adjudicate among the various strands of Islamic jurisprudence was such that he declared himself a qayem al-zaman, a semi-divine personality given the mission by Prophet Muhammad PBUH himself to reform the faith. He travelled to Hejaz (Saudi Arabia) to learn the jurisprudence of Imam Malik and the other great jurists of Islam.

A renowned Deobandi scholar Maulana Ubaidullah Sindhi in his book Shah Waliullah aur unka falsafa quotes Shah Waliullah as writing that Prophet Muhammad PBUH ordered him in person that he should ‘bind’ all the schools of sunni fiqh together and not reject hadith. The great reformer then set out to combine the teachings of Hanafi, Maliki, Shafei and Hanbali Islam without denigrating any one of the schools. He was averse to accepting hadith, but in obedience to the Prophet PBUH, he selectively permitted the validity of hadith.

The civil war in Afghanistan and the jehad in Kashmir have gradually veered to a Deobandi consensus. The dominant Hizbe Islami of Hekmatyar, a flag-bearer of modernist-Islamist thinking of Maududi and Hasan al-Banna, lost favour with the Pakistani establishment in the mid-1990s. In its place, the Taliban of Mullah Umar, trained in the traditional Deobandi jurisprudence, enjoy popularity in Pakistan. In Kashmir, Jamaat-e-Islami’s Hizbul Mujahideen has been eclipsed by Harkat-ul-Ansar (Mujahideen) of Deobandi persuasion.

In a parallel development, the Wahabi or Ahle Hadith warriors have gained strength. The most effective jehadi outfit based in Lahore is Lashkar-e-Tayba, functioning as a subordinate branch of Dawat al-Irshad, an organisation with contacts in the Arab world, collecting jehad funds among the expatriate Muslim communities in the West. It has training camps in Afghanistan and Azad Kashmir and is arguably the most resourceful militia fighting in Kashmir. It has contacts in Central Asia through its training camps in Afghanistan. Osama bin Laden has strengthened the old Wahabi connection with the Deobandi Taliban rulers. Some American sources claim that the Taliban amirul momineen, Mullah Umar, has married Osama’s daughter.

The third strand of fundamentalist movement which seems attracted to the Wahabi-Deobandi combine in Afghanistan, is the Naqshbandiya. Most of the Muslim-populated North Caucasian region in Russia follows the shrine-worshipping mystical order of the Naqshbandiya. The uprising in Chechnya and its incursion into Dagestan is turning the Naqshbandi followers to the more strict orthodoxy of the Saudi-based Wahabi order. Russian onslaught in Chechnya is transforming the mystical faith into a militant one.

All three movements, the Deobandi, the Ahle Hadith-Wahabi, and Naqshbandi-Mudaddidi (in India), are against bida’a (innovation) in Islamic rituals. They oppose the eclecticism that developed among Muslims under the Mughals and wished to separate local accretion from the pure Islamic faith. The founder of the Naqshbandi order, Shaikh Ahmad, compelled the Mughal king Jehangir to persecute the Muslim mystical orders that had developed a spiritual consensus with Hindus and Sikhs.

The other preoccupation of the Naqshbandis in India was opposition to the Shiite faith developing in the South of India and in the northern province of Oudh. Shaikh Ahmad had decreed that the Shiites were apostates and had to be put to the sword.

Annemarie Schimmel in his book: Islam in the Indian Subcontinent tells us that that Shah Waliullah, the spititual patron of the Deobandis, in his youth was greatly inspired by the anti-innovation, anti-Shiite thought of Sheikh Ahmad Sirhindi. It seems that the antecedents of Shah Waliullah were derived from a Naqshbandi inspiration while his followers were inclined by his teachings to Wahabism. This sowed the seeds of a tripartite deobandi-wahabi-naqshbandi alliance that has now come into being.

John K. Cooley in his book : Unholy wars - Afghanistan, America and international terrorism; the author reveals that Mullah Umar and Osama bin Laden first met in 1989 in a Deobandi mosque, Banuri Masjid, in Karachi, and presumably formed an alliance based spiritually on the traditional closeness of the Deobandis, who follow the Hanafi school, with the Wahabis, who accept only hadith under Imam Hanbal and Abdul Wahab. Thus the protection offered to Osama by the Taliban, and the threats delivered by Pakistan’s JUI leaders to American citizens in support of Osama bin Laden, seem to spring from a historical interface between the two schools of Islamic fiqh.

The non-Pakhtun population of Pakistan is predominantly Barelvi, following the Hanafi fiqh of Ahmad Raza Khan (1876-1931 AD) who led a successful revolt in India against the stringent teachings of Deobandi-Wahabi school of thought. The stronghold of Barelvism remains Punjab, the largest province of Pakistan in terms of population, but increasingly the state-controlled mosques are being given to Deobandi khateebs. Because of the rise of the Deobandi militias, and their funding by the Arabs for their anti-Shiite doctrine, the province is rapidly losing its Barelvi temperament. The Tablighi Jamaat which holds its annual congregation in Lahore has become a powerful influence favouring a Deobandi point of view. It gathers 2 million people in its congregation but it is important to note that over 90 percent of its attendants are Pakhtun from Peshawar and the Tribal Areas bordering Afghanistan.

CONCLUSION:The two jurisprudences: Deobandi & Wahabi, established only couple of hundred years ago, have radically ‘reformed’ Islam to one having a very cold & heartless core.

p.s. For understanding of Wahabism, please refer to the thread posted in this forum -Feb 13, '00: THE WAHABIS AND ISLAM.

[This message has been edited by logical (edited February 13, 2000).]

Deobandi and wahabis 2 differnt things your confused mind is mixing them up haha good work... ;) anyways i didnt read this pathetic post of yours waste of time....

Jaawan


Till next time**Keep_It_Simple_Stupid**©

Jawaan

I would like to learn the differences between deobandis and wahabis. I have a personal interest in this topic. The names are used in conjunction so much that I would really like to know more about it.

Assalam Allaikum,

Deobandis and wahabis are absolutely different. There is a group that likes to paint them as having same beliefs, yet they are vastly different from each other.

The term "wahabi" in the modern day usage is widely used to describe someone subscibing to the teachings of salafis. Salafia is a group that claims to follow the ways of the pious predecessors, the first three generations of Islam. They hate bida'h or newly invented matters in deen. In madhab, they claim to follow the authentic sunnah of Rasool Allah sallalaho alaihe wasalam however, they are closer to madhab of imam Ahmad bin Hanbal (RA). In reality, they are inspired by the writings and ideas of scholars such as imam ibne-Taimiyah and his student Hafiz Ibnul Qaiyum (RA). Please note that imam ibne-Taimiyah differed with his contemporary scholars on many issues including the issue of 3 divorces and undertaking the journey with the sole intention of visiting the 'rauda' of Rasool Allah (sallalaho alaihe wasalam) and was therefore fairly unpopular among some of the scholastic circles of his time.

He also criticized many of the practices of the sufis of his time as 'shirk' such as circumambulating around their tombs by ignorant people, praying in the direction of their tombs and asking directly from a deceased saint. He criticized the great sufi saint of his time otherwise known as Shaykh-e-Akbar or the Grand Shaykh Mohiuddin Ibne-Arabi (RA) for some of the esoteric concepts that he wrote in his famous mystical tract known as 'fusoos-ul-hikam'. Briefly, the concept is known as 'wahdatul wujood' or unity of Existence and the salafis interpret as if the Creator and the Created are a intermingled in a single Essence. He denounced another mystic of earlier time Mansur Bin Hallaj (RA) for crying in spiritual ecstasy 'anal huq', I am the Truth. If someone is not deeply aware of the teachings and experiences of these saints he is bound to be bewildred by their terminology. Unfortunately, Ibne-Taimiyah was not initiated into an order, and was thus unaware of some of the intricacies of their ideas. He passed the judgement on the outward meaning as he saw it and even if it was a mistake in ijtihaad he should not be criticized for it, for he was only human. By the same token, one must refrain from opening up one's tongue in the matter of these 'auliya' since they were very close to Allah in his uboodiyat and to question their aqeedah is not for common folk. The majority of the scholars, including deoband accept their truthfulness while some suspend their judgement.

Another issue, of more recent nature, is the matter of taqleed or following one of the four mujtahid imams of madhab. The salafis believe that submission is only for Allah and his Rasool sallalaho alaihe wasalam. However, they don't understand the difference between following somebody's opinion in the interpretation of Quran and Sunnah and obeying somebody as one's Creator, only power that could benefit or harm you. When people follow an imam, they only follow his rulings in shariah such as how to pray, what to do in a fiqh matter. They don't consider him to be their Creator. Of course, if they did, they will be doing 'Shirk', no doubt. However, nobody does this kind of taqleed nowadays. Now, as to the question for which imam is right, it is considered by the scholars of all four imams that to follow any one of them is ok for a muqtaddi. A muqtaddi can be a person who has not acquired enough knowledge in the Quran and Hadith to deduce rules and laws from it. A person capable of doing that is known as 'Mujtahid'. This has been an issue upon which the scholars of all the four madhabs including, Hanafi, Shafei, Maliki, Hanbali, have had consensus over the centuries. Only recently had this idea been debated violently by salafis who unconditionally consider it haraam.

Finally, the salafis also accuse two major schools of thoughts, barelvis and deobandis, representing sunni majority in the Indian sub-continent as cherishing beliefs of shirk. According to the salafis, their scholars were firm believers in the sufi concept of wahdatul-wujud, which according to them is the idea where the Absolute Being of Allah is intermingled with the phenomenal being of Creation (naudhobillah), may Allah save us from this!! I, can personally speak from my experience with the deobandi scholars on this issue, that this is nothing short of a blatant exaggeration and a wide open lie. Explaining the concept of tauheed is a whole issue in itself, however, in a nutshell, the deoband scholars consider anybody having this concept of wahdatul wujood is a kaafir. They believe Allah subanahu wa ta'ala is far above these kinds of false imputations and is free from all imperfections.

If Allah wills, I will put up another post describing the background of deobandis and their beliefs in general, specifically their concept of tauheed. I hope this helps. Wasalam.

Wahabis is a word use to discribe some group of people who do some things that other people who do not do those things...my point is wahabis ONLY believe or do stuff according to QUran and hadith(BOOKS of hadiths) nothign else is our believe...they perform islamic activities according to hadith and quran..and how mohammad and his campanions did...they dont believe in fiqa...because it is 85% different than hadiths books...
example: in fiqa it says that you dont have to read surah fatiha behind imam...but in books like bukharii and muslim(hadith books) its says about 1000 times that you HAVE to read surah fatiha behind imam other wise NO namazz...

Jaawan


Till next time**Keep_It_Simple_Stupid**©

The Wahabi movement was a reformist movement founded about 250 years ago and are condemned by Ahl as Sunnat as 'deviants and defiler of muslim faith'.

The article posted by logical talks about the political environment that lead the three disparate groups: The Wahabis, Deobandis & Naqshibandi Sufis to become allies; all three groups adhere to extremist teachings and are united in their hatred of the Shias.

Twisted logic aside, what is their justification for hating just one particular group? Thats what i'd like to know, if any 1 would care to enlighten me, s'il vous plait.

The below Fatwa and denunciation of the Deobandis is self-explainatory:

Fatwa of three hundred Ulama against Deobandis:

The Deobandis, because of their contempt and insult, in their acts of worship, towards all saints, prophets, and even the Holy Prophet Muhammad and the very Person of God Himself, are definitely murtadd and kafir.

Their apostasy and heresy is of the worst kind, so that anyone who doubts their apostasy and heresy even slightly is himself a murtadd and kafir. Muslims should be very cautious of them, and stay away from them. Let alone praying behind them, one should not let them pray behind one, or allow them into mosques, or eat the animal slaughtered by them, or join them on happy or sad occasions, or let them come near one, or visit them in illness, or attend their funerals, or give them space in Muslim grave-yards. To sum up, one must stay away from them completely.

(See the Unanimous Fatwa of Three Hundred Ulama, published by Muhammad Ibrahim of Bhagalpur)

Deobandis should be declared non-Muslim minority:

In March 1953, a poster was put up on walls in Karachi titled: Demands: Deoband sect should be declared a separate minority''.
Among other things it said:
Just as Sikhs originated from Hinduism, but are not Hindus, and Protestants came from Roman Catholicism, but are not Catholics, similarly, the Deobandi sect originated in the Sunni community, but are not Sunnis. The representatives of this minority sect are Mufti Muhammad Shafi, Sayyid Sulaiman Nadawi, Ihtasham-ul-Haqq, and Abul Ala Maudoodi, etc.''

After this it was demanded that this sect be declared a non-Muslim minority. It was signed by 28 persons
(see Tulu`-i-Islam, May 1953, p. 64).

Based on above: the Wahabis and Deobandis would be shunned - quite the contrary!
The Wahabis and Deobandis, today, occupy the leadership ranks of fanatical Islam sweeping South Asia and are supported whole-heartedly by the Sunni establishment; and, their Madrasas, main one being in Karachi, turn out scholars in their thousands, indoctrinated in this 'filth'.

[This message has been edited by wowyi (edited February 26, 2000).]

Deoband -

This history of deoband is a rough sketch that I am narrating from my memory and may not be all-inclusive. However, I will insha-a-Allah try to give a brief yet accurate account of its origin.

Deoband was actually founded by Molana Qasim Nanotwi (RA), a reputed scholar of his time who participated
in the jehad movement of Syed Ahmed Barelwi(shaheed). His spiritual lineage goes back to Shah Waliullah Dehlavi, through his shaykh. He was initiated into the Insaniyyah order and was a mureed of haji Imdadullah muhajir makki (RA),a renowned sufi shaykh of his time. After the rebellion of 1857 failed, many of the sub-continent scholars fled to Makkah or Medina. Molana Qasim Nanotwi (RA), however, decided to wage jihad on a different level now. The problems
that the muslims of sub-contiment were facing at that crucial juncture was proper grounding of religious knowledge and values. With this noble purpose in mind, Molana decided to lay the foundation of the great learning institute of Darul-Uloom Deoband in Deoband which is inside the district of Saharanpur, UP, India. Darul-Uloom has produced great luminaries like Imam-ul-Asr in hadith Molana Anwar Shah Kashmiri, Shaykh-ul-Hind Molana Mahmood ul Hasan Deobandi, Molana Rasheed Ahmed Gangohi, Molana Khalil Ahmed Saharanpuri, Hakeem-ul-ummat Molana Ashraf Ali Thanwi, Molana Shabbir Ahmed Usmani, first Mufti-e-Azam of Pakistan Molana Mufti Muhammed Shafie, Allama
Yousuf Binori being prominent among others. No doubt, Darul-Uloom has fulfilled its promise and has left a valuable legacy of scholars. Deobandis are hanafis in madhab and maturidis in aqeedah. Most of the scholars are mashaikh of tariqat meaning they tread the path of sulook. No doubt these scholars have produced monumental works in the fields of Quranic tafseer, hadith, fiqh, kalam, and others. The tafseers Ruh-ul-ma'ani, tafseer-e-majidi, tafseer-e-Usmani, ma'ariful Quran are renowned among the muslims of sub-continent. These scholars have written sharahs (explanations) of many hadith books including sihah-sitta in Arabic and Urdu. The book written by Molana Yousuf Kandhlavi (RA), Hiyatus-sahaba, in arabic is a one of its kind book on the lives of sahaba. These very scholars also have refuted the shias on many occasions in their books. One needs
only to see the book 'Amir Mu'awiyya and historical facts' in urdu to see. Also the book 'Gift of Athn'a Ashari' is a
prime example of that.

If somebody wants to learn about the creed of a group, then he or she must read their books. These pious scholars are only slandered by shias and innovators whose teachings were rejected by these scholars. I have carefully observed the teachings of deobandis and have found them to be on a correct aqeedah and middle course in most matters unlike some other groups who have gone to extremes in either their aqeedah or teachings. It is solely Allah who elevates
and disgraces. A charge against them is that they are not accepted by the mainstream muslims. However, it is a superficial and fabricated charge. If you research, you'll find that the academic contributions that these scholars have in religion is far beyond their slanderers. Majority of the great madarasahs in Pakistan and India are following deobandi creed. Two of the great learning institutions known to one and all are Jamiah Allama Yousuf Binori (RA) and
Darul-Uloom are located in Karachi which produce hundreds and thousands of scholars and huffaz. If these people were heretics in their teachings then the logic dictates that they must have been banned by Pakistan long time ago. However, nobody has the courage to challenge their creed since its established on correct knowledge and orthodox Islam. May Allah give us the correct understanding and reality of deen. Ameen

Iqadeer states:
"They (Wahabis) hate bida'h or newly invented matters in deen."

Actually, both the Wahabis and Deobandis proclaim that any innovation or re-interpretation of Quran & Hadith of the Four Sunni Imams is bida'at. The Wahabi and Deobandi movements came about in the last 200 years.

A question to ask here is: Aren't the teachings of both the Wahabis & Deobandis bida'at considering that the door to Ijtihad was closed after the 4 Sunni Imams?

Iqadeer also states:
"These pious scholars are only slandered by shias and innovators whose teachings were rejected by these scholars."

The truth is otherwise:
370 of the most prominent scholars of India and 32 of the highest Islamic Jurist of Makkah and Medina issued a fatwa of Kufr on the Wahabi movement and it's followers 93 years ago, long before the present Saudi Wahhabi Najdis came into power and turned everything upside down.

In fact, in those days Deobandis were held in the same contempt as Qadianis are held today by Muslims (i.e. as non-Muslims),and 300 Ulamas declared Fatwa of kufr against Deobandis.

However time, history and the devils handy-work have managed to conceal the truth of this movement from the general Muslim populace of today.

To the extent that Deobandis and Tableegh Jamaat(Wahabis) are seen as heros of Islam in our time, supported financially & doctrinally by the Saudis, whereas only 94 years ago they were considered outside of the fold of Islam.

Ignorence can be cured my friends...logical...tableeghi jaamat is NOT wahabis...trust me they are not...anywayss here is something that might un-confuse you from the devilish cloud...

No group actually calls itself Wahabis. However, people may call some of those who express certain views as Wahabis, which is a name supposed to refer to the followers of Imam Muhammad ibn Abdulwahhab who was a great
reformer and scholar. He lived in Najd over 200 years ago and worked hard to eradicate all innovations from Islamic worship. Such innovations had crept into the practices of Muslim communities due to ignorance and long periods of decline undergone by Muslim communities. He maintained that the example of the Prophet i.e. the Sunnah should be
followed diligently. There is no disagreement among scholars that this is required of every Muslim. It is unfortunate that some of the practices which Imam Muhammad ibn Abdulwahhab spoke very strongly against still persist in some Muslimcommunities. These include such terrible practices as visiting the graves of supposedly saintly people and asking the
dead to intervene with Allah on behalf of the visitor for any purpose. Such a practice Islam shuns, since it is a manifestation of associating partners with Allah. Imam Muhammad ibn Abdulwahhab belonged to the Sunni Muslims who, by virtue of their name, should follow the Sunnah, or the example, set by Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) with
diligence. Hence, it is wrong to classify Muslims as Wahabis and Sunnis, since the followers of Imam Abdulwahhab belong to the Sunni group of Muslims. The vigorous arguments and fighting you have spoken of are certainly deplorable. This happens, nevertheless, because people are sometimes too rigid in their views. Those who insist on following the Sunnah of the Prophet diligently should have the patience to teach their fellow Muslims, with respect and compassion, that some of their practices are unacceptable from the Muslim point of view. Had they done so, they would find better response by other Muslims.

  • yeah i cut and pasted it..so sue me!!!

Jaawan


Till next time**Keep_It_Simple_Stupid**©

Here is something else you might put your mind to read...Quran and hadith is to be followed nothing else...and if a person tells you to follow quran and hadith and stay on the path of mohammad and his compainions..it does not make that person wrong...anwayss i have said it before and will say it again...wahabis ONLY follow quran and hadith(s) nothing else is part of agenda to follow islam... here is something else found on the web..yeah i ll cut and paste it on your confused mind ;) no offence now take it easy.

The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him)told us beforehand that this Ummah would be divided as the previous nations were divided, as stated in the saheeh hadeeth:

Wahb ibn Baqiyyah told us from Khaalid from Muhammad ibn ‘Amr from Abu Salamah from Abu Hurayrah who said: the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “The Jews were divided into seventy-one or seventy-two sects, and the Christians were divided into seventy-one or seventy-two sects, and my Ummah will be divided into seventy-three sects.” This was narrated by Abu Dawood in his Sunan, Kitaab al-Sunnah, Baab Sharh al-Sunnah.

It was reported from ‘Awf ibn Maalik who said: the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “The Jews were divided into seventy-one sects, one of which is in Paradise and seventy are in the Fire. The Christians were divided into seventy-two sects, seventy-one of which are in the Fire and one is in Paradise. By the One in Whose hand is the soul of Muhammad, my Ummah will be divided into seventy-three sects, one of which will be in Paradise and seventy-two will be in the Fire.” It was said, O Messenger of "Allaah, who are they? He said, “Al-Jamaa’ah.”

Sunan Ibn Maajah, no. 3982.

What is meant by al-Jamaa’ah is the ‘aqeedah and actions of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and his Companions.

Among the sects that claim to belong to Islam are those who are misguided with regard to the Unity of Allaah (Tawheed) and His Names and Attributes; they say that everything that exists is Allaah and that He is incarnate or present in His creation – glorified be He far above what they say. On the contrary, He is above His heavens, settled on His throne,distinct from His creation.

Others are misguided with regard to eeman (faith) and say that deeds are separate from faith and that faith does not increase or decrease. The correct view is that faith consists of words and deeds; it increases when one does acts of obedience to Allaah and decreases when one commits sin.

Others are misguided by their declaring that the person who commits sin goes beyond the pale of Islam and is doomed to eternity in the Fire. The correct view is that the one who commits a major sin – apart from shirk and al-kufr al-akbar – does not go out of Islam.

Others are misguided with regard to the issue of al-qadaa’wa’l-qadar (divine decree), and said that man has no choice in what he does. The correct view is that man has freedom of willon the basis of which he will be called to account and will bearthe consequences of his deeds.

Others are misguided with regard to the Qur’aan, and say that it is created. The correct view is that it is the words of Allaah, revealed not created.

Others are misguided with regard to the Sahaabah, whom they revile and denounce as kaafirs even though they are the companions of the Prophet among whom the Wahy (Revelation) was revealed, and they are the most knowledgeable and the most devoted in worship among this Ummah, and they strove injihaad for the sake of Allaah and Allaah supported this religion through them – may Allaah be pleased with them all.

And there are other groups who deviated from the path of Islam and innovated matters in the religion of Allaah; each of them rejoices in what they have, but they have followed the ways of the Shaytaan and gone against the words of Allaah (interpretation of the meaning):

“And verily, this is My straight path, so follow it, and follow not (other) paths, for they will separate you away from His path. This He has ordained for you that you may become Al-Muttaqoon (the pious)” [al-An’aam 6:153]

We ask Allaah to make us among the followers of the Sunnah who will be saved from the Fire, and to admit us to Paradise
among the righteous. May Allaah bless ourProphet Muhammad
GOOD LUCK>>>!!!

Jaawan


Till next time**Keep_It_Simple_Stupid**©

logical states -
"However time, history and the devils handy-work have managed to conceal the truth of this movement from the general Muslim populace of today."

A point that arises here is why would they conceal the truth of this movement. In fact, this is a flat-out lie. The wahabis promote same teachings as they did over 200 years ago and so do deobandis. The Qadianis, Ismailis, Shias, Barelvis don't conceal their shameful teachings so why should deobandis feel that way. The teachings of deobandis are based on hanafi fiqh and maturidi aqeedah and its clear what these both are. Deobandis consider ceremonies such as present-day milad or mawlid (celebrating birthday of prophet Mohammad (sallalaho alayhe wasalam) by barelvis, teeja, giyarween shareef, chaleeswan, barsi, koonday, asking directly from ghayr Allah ie saints and prophets, and other things that have no basis in either Quran or sunnah as bid'ah or innovation in deen. Deobandis emphasize sticking to the sunnah to the fullest to please Allah and performance of obligatory acts such as salaat, fasting, zakaat and hajj. At the time when deobandis started their teachings, the Indian muslims were deeply involved in the above mentioned innovations on the expense of salaat and other obligatory acts. Now, alhamdollilah due to the efforts of deoband, many have changed their lives and live according to the true teachings of Quran and sunnah. That is why deoband is also responsible for producing ulema such as Molana Abul Hasan Nadwi (RA), who recently died on last friday of Ramadhan and was renowned throughout the Islamic world as one of the greatest scholars of this century. I, myself could be considered a pariah in my relatives for forsaking barelvi beliefs and accepting deobandi teachings, however, I did it after careful comparative observation of both ideologies and found deoband sticking much more closer to sunnah than any of the present day so-called Islamic sunni groups. My intention to post all this is not a particular group bashing as the author of this thread has intended but to give a clear picture of the truth. I hope we can all learn from this. Ameen.

The Wahabis/Najdis or Salafis have rejected their own Hannafi interpretations of Islamic jurisprudence; as such, the claim that they are Hannafi sunni muslims by Jawa’an and Iqadeer has been rejected by traditional Islam.

Jawa’an also states:
“…wahabis ONLY follow quran and hadith(s) nothing else is part of agenda to follow islam… “ This is a blatant lie and is a ruse or trick to blind the muslims.

The founder, Abdul Wahab, and his creed Wahabism preach that the Prophet Mohammed was but a mere man, and that to invoke him with other saints, was idolatry, and was not authorized by the Koran. He adhered religiously to the text of the sacred book, but rejected all traditions, Hadith and commentaries of the Imams or doctors.

Pls note: invocations or tawassul is not only permitted but encouraged by Quran & Sunnah.

He contended that Mussulmans must be brought back to the original spirit of the Qur`an, to the exclusive worship of God, in his undivided unity. In this spirit, he forbade the pilgrimage to Mecca, the invocation of the Prophet, the use of luxuries, tobacco, silk, and jewels. …he propagated his doctrines with the sword, and the armies of his successors marched upon Mecca and Medina, destroying those venerable shrines, and robbed them of the unnumbered votive offerings, with which they had been enriched, by piety and devotion. The Wahabis also plundered Karbala and destroyed the mausoleum of Imam Hussain (pbuh).

Mohammed Ali Pasha – the Sultan of Egypt, Syria & Arabia, defeated the Wahabis of Arabia in 1813, with the capture of Dariyah, the Wahabi capital, and their Chief Abdullah ibn Saud who was sent to the Sultan together with the few remaining objects of value, which was recovered from among those, which Saud’s father had plundered from the sacred shrines of Mecca and Medina.

There were also pearls and precious stones of unknown value, which pious veneration had bestowed as votive offerings, at the tomb of the Prophet.

Abdullah ibn Sa`ud was presented in chains at the feet of his sovereign and was publicly decapitated at Constantinople.

Tableeghi Jamaat and Wahhabis in the Hadith:

The Holy Prophet(Sallal Laahu Alaihi Wasallam) has Prophesied that many individuals and religious sects will cause dissension and mischief till the Day of Judgement. He has made a particular reference to the Wahhabi/Tableeghi Movement.

FIRST HADITH
Imam Bukhari(Radiallhu Anhu) quotes this Hadith from Abdullah ibn Umar(Radiallhu Anhu) that the Holy Prophet(Sallal Laahu Alaihi Wasallam) once prayed for Syria(Shaam) and Yemen.

It is narrated that there were some people of Najd also present in the gathering and they requested the Prophet(Sallal Laahu Alaihi Wasallam) to make du’a for Najd also. The Holy Prophet(Sallal Laahu Alaihi Wasallam) continued saying: “O! Allah, Shower Blessings on Shaam and Yemen,”

The people of Najd again requested the Prophet(Sallal Laahu Alaihi Wasallam) to offer prayers for Najd. The Prophet(Sallal Laahu Alaihi Wasallam) said: “It is a place of tremor and Fitna(Mischief) and the horn of Shaitaan will rise from there.”(Bukhari Shareef)

It can be deduced from the above Hadith that Najd is neither blessed nor a good place but one of Fitna and Evil.

Najd has been deprived of the prayers of the Holy Prophet(Sallal Laahu Alaihi Wasallam) and therefore Najd has the seal of misery and misfortune and hoping for any good from there is going against the Will of Allah.

It will create havoc in the Muslim world. We are now witnessing the emergence of the Wahhabis or Najdis who, with the assistance of petrodollars, are sweeping the Muslim world and are bribing them into accepting Wahhabism as the official version of Islam.

Wahhabism is a disease but so many are misled into believing that it is curing the Ummah of Shirk, Kufr and Bidah. It is being portrayed as a revivalist movement. This is against the Ahadith. Looking at the geographical position of Najd, it lies to the East of Medina. The Prophet(Sallal Laahu Alaihi Wasallam) pointed towards the East and said: “There, that is the direction from where Fitna will emerge.”

To read all the hadiths pls refer to this link:
http://www.ahle-sunnat.org.uk/TABHADTH.html

Oh well than you think following quran and hadith is NOT a good thing...to me thats what your saying! OK people stop following quran and hadith its not good your commiting a bad sin wow i see your muslim stupid intelligence my friend. I dont really care but i do care about what message you give to others about others...it should be The RIGHT one not wronge one misster. Ok well follow your grandparents foot step from now one...well go on to daabarss and ask the dead for help...we ll give ggiiyaarween sharifs to some hunted peerrrss....what else...we ll follow the foot steps of your brothersss hindus and jews thats real islam to YOU well...your aan idiot...i know im right and quran and hadith are right...use your grandparents teaching as a toilet papers may allah grant you hell.

Jaawan


Till next time**Keep_It_Simple_Stupid**©

[This message has been edited by Jaawan (edited March 06, 2000).]

Jawa'an:
You are falsifying what I said on March 5. Pls re-read again.

What you are doing is same as the Wahabis - pretending to be something that they are not.

Wahhabism is a disease but so many are misled into believing that it is curing the Ummah of Shirk, Kufr and Bidah. It is being portrayed as a revivalist movement. This is against the Ahadith.

riches in teh shrines of mecca and medina, and at the prophet's (pbuh) grave?

Now that was not right. and if someone took jewels and other riches that people put there, they did a good job.

I am not going to argue whabahi shahabi deobandi barelwi etc etc.

I DO KNOW that there is something wrong if you start putting jewes at the prophet's grave as an offering.

In his haste, apparently mr wowyi has skipped most of the posts that deal here with the difference between these two vastly different schools of thought ie, wahabis and deobandis. Writing more on it would amount to wasting time if its his intention to somehow vaguely prove that they are flip sides of the same coin. History of deoband is manifestly clear and links back to Molana Qasim (RA) who came much later than Abdul Wahab and never met any of his disciples. Molana Qasim believed in sufism and was a disciple of haji Imdadullah (RA) whom the barelvis appreciate as well. Wahabis not only despise sufism they pronounce takfeer on some of the biggest sufis such as Ibne-Arabi (RA). Deobandis are hanafis while wahabis are mostly ahle-hadith. Deobandis believe in tawasul, ie asking Allah through the medium of Rasool Allah (sallalaho alayhe wasalam) and other pious people, while wahabis reject tawasul altogether and barelvis prefer to ask directly from saints and Rasool Allah (sallalaho alayhe wasalam), which, by the way, I don't approve of at all. Deoband was formed to undercut deviant innovatory practices that crept inside of sufism in the name of tariqat which were neither prescribed in the shariah or had any connection to the shuyookh in the past. It revived sunnah and study of Quran and held these two paramount vis-a-vis tariqat and subscribed to the saying of Shah Wali Ullah that shariat without tariqat is mere philosophy and tariqat withour shariat is heresy and disbelief. Abdul Wahab also fought innovatory practices, yet, he shed much bloodshed and levelled many graves in doing so which are still seen as harsh and uncalled for by deobandis. His objective was to get rid of them yet he inflicted unnecessary cruelty upon his countrymen in doing so. The salafis of today are followers of people like Albani who had made a living out of critically examining the lives of mujtahid imams especially Abu Hanifa (RA) to further his own ideas and aims. You can see the same mentality in his followers who do not hesitate in the least in pronouncing hanafis as kaafirs and rejectors of the hadith. Now, tell me mr Wowyi, are they both equal?

Well i guess stupidity have no ends...lets see if you can understand me on this one what ever your name is....wahabis follow QURAN and HADITH ok now that is the mode of practice in islam...now if you call your self a muslim and do something that is not in islam(other words that is not in quran and hadith, your no longer a muslim) following quran hadith is GOOD and thats why mohammad told us to do..now to you it might be sin but to me its a perfect islam weather i follow it or not! the mode which people follow is the question not weather an individual is a perfect muslim or not. get my point or still in that phase of stupidity?

Jaawan


Till next time**Keep_It_Simple_Stupid**©

This might be little over a book for you to read but please do read it...it will help the confussion about wahabism digest easly in your brain...sorry its long! yeah its a copy and paste thing...see my lawyer if you wana sue

In the first half of the twelfth century (Hijra) the Islamic World had reached its extreme decline degradation and utter fall. The atmosphere was very gloomy and darkness had covered all its regions.Moral degradation and corruption was rampant everywhere. As for religion it was decadent as everything else. The pure and austere monotheism (TAWHEED) of the Prophet (sal) had become corrupted with the burgeoning growth of superstition and mysticism. The mosques stood empty,
unfrequented and even deserted. The ignorant multitude decked out in amulets, charms and rosaries
listened to and blindly followed squalid faqeers and ecstatic dervishes. These men urged them to
perform pilgrimages to the tombs of Saints and seek their intercession with Allah. As for the moral
precepts ordained by the Qur’an they too were ignored as well as defied. Even the consumption of
intoxicants and opium were well nigh universal. In all certainty the life had been bulldozed out of Islam,
leaving behind naught but a dry husk of meaningless ritual and degrading superstition.

        The period of the Pious Predecessors being already passed, innovations and superstitions cropped
        up and vastly mushroomed. The people went back to their old practices of idolatry. They started paying
        homage to shrines and graves, so much so that they even directed their devotional prayers and
        supplications towards the graves to the exclusion of Allah. They gave precedence to the philosophical
        views and taqleed (blind following) over the Sunnah. They divested Allah of His essential attributes by
        making false interpretations on the Qur’anic texts.

        But, all praises to Allah, no generation, persistently beset with innovations and abominable Shirk was
        ever devoid of sincere reformers who revived the faith to its pristine purity. In such darkest hour, a voice
        came crying out of the vast Arabian desert, the cradle of Islam, calling the faithful back to the true path,
        the one and only way - the Qur’an and the Sunnah. That was the great Mujaddid and puritan reformer,
        the celebrated Sheikh Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab, who kindled a fire, which spread and engulfed
        the remotest corners of the Muslim World, purging Islam of its decadence and reviving the fervor of
        days gone by. The morning of reformation had dawned and the great re-awakening of the Islamic world
        had begun.

        This peaceful, religious, revivalist movement of the Sheikh was obnoxious to the Turks and others for
        more reasons than one. They tried to crush this movement by force. They even killed some of the
        leaders, but could not destroy the movement outright. The movement lived on and is now growing all
        over the world. Everywhere in the Muslim world we are witnessing, the raising of the banner of Tawheed
        and the revival of the Call to the Qur’an and Sunnah.

        All around the Muslim world, we see some Muslims, individually and collectively proclaiming the Call to
        Tawheed and the return to the Qur’an and Sunnah in the face of opposition by the ‘Saint-worshippers’,
        `Grave-worshippers`, `the Sufis’ and the ‘Tariqat followers’. These deviant groups all purport or make the
        false claim to be Ahl us Sunnah wal Jam’aah and label the true callers to The Sunnah as `Wahhabis’

        In view of the ignoble and false propaganda mounted against the reformatory movement of Sheikh
        Muhammad ibn Abd al Wahhab and the derogatory use of the word `Wahhabi’ for the movement ant its
        followers, we will Insha Allah in the course of this booklet, give a short account of the important events
        of his life and salient features of his creed and of his works.


        HIS LIFE STORY
        Sheikh Muhammad ibn Abd al Wahhab ibn Sulaiman ibn Ali ibn Muhammad ibn Ahmad ibn Rashid al
        Tamimi was born in the year 1155 A.H.(1703 C.E.) in ‘Ayina to the north of Riyadh, in the Kingdom of
        Saudi Arabia during the reign of Abdulla ibn Muhammad ibn Hamd ibn Muammar. He excelled over his
        contemporaries in intelligence and physique and was able to commit the Quran to memory by the time
        he was ten years old. His father found him capable of leading the congregational prayers and decided
        to get him married that year.

        He studied the Hanbali Jurisprudence, Tafsir and Hadith from his learned father. During his childhood
        itself, he directed his full attention to the books on Tafsir, Hadith and Aqidah and particularly to the
        writings of Sheik al Islam Ibn Taimiya and Ibn al Qayyim and made a deep study of them.

        He left his native town to perform the Hajj and then proceeded to Madinah. At that time Sheikh Abdullah
        bin Ibrahim ibn Saif belonging to the progeny of Saif Najdi was chief of the scholars of Madinah. Sheikh
        Muhammad acquired a good deal of knowledge from him and came to be loved and held in high
        esteem by his teacher. His strong stand on Thawheed and his deep concern over false beliefs and evil
        deeds brought about a strong bond between the Sheikh and his teacher. He was so impressed by his
        student that Sheikh Abdullah granted him permission of narrating well-known hadiths of two of the
        authorities. Firstly on the authority of Ibn Muflih reporting from Sheikh Ibn Taiymiyyah and reaching up to
        Imam Ahmad. Secondly on the authority of Abd al Rahman bin Rajab, reporting from Ibn al Qayyim who
        narrated it from his teacher Sheikh ibn Taiymiyya reaching up to Imam Ahmad. Sheikh Abdullah also
        authorized him to narrate all the traditions reported by Sheikh Abd al Baqi Hanbali, the chief among the
        great teachers of his time. He also authorised him to narrate the traditions of the Sahih of Bukhari and
        the traditions of the Sahih of Muslim and commentaries of both, the Sunan of Tirmidhi, Nasa’ai, Abu
        Dawud, Ibn Maajah, the Muwatta of Imam Malik and the Musnad of Imam Ahmad.

        During this time he came to know and benefited from the knowledge of other scholars such as Ali
        Afendi Daghastanee, Ismaeel Ajluni and others. Then he moved on to Nejd, Basra and Syria for the
        purpose of acquiring further knowledge. He stayed for a long time in Basra, where he pursued his
        studies under a number of renowned scholars, among whom Sheikh Muhammad Majmui was most
        prominent. During this time he compiled and published many valuable books on the topic of
        innovations, superstitions and the supplication to the dead ones in the graves. He supported his
        treatises with manifest evidence from the Quran.

        The adherents of falsehood defamed, tortured and turned him out of Basra. They also persecuted his
        teacher Sheikh Majmui. He left for the town of Zubair in the scorching heat of the summer and was
        almost dying of thirst, when Allah sent to him a man called Abu Hamidan. He found the Sheikh to be a
        man of learning and righteousness. So he mounted him on his animal and took him to Zubair. Sheikh
        Muhammad thought of going to Syria to quench his thirst for more knowledge, but soon fell short of
        provision and was compelled to return to Nejd. He arrived at Ahsa and stayed with the Sheikh Abdullah
        ibn Abd al Latiff Shafi’i and studied under him.


        UN-ISLAMIC PRACTICES OF THAT TIME.
        Sheikh Muhammad then went to Harimala, a village of Nejd because his father had transferred there
        and stayed with him. He devoted himself fully to the learning of Tafsir and Hadith, particularly the works
        of Skeikh ibn Taiymiyyah and Sheikh ibn Qayyim. This immensely increased his knowledge and insight
        and infused in his heart a spirit of determination and steadfastness. With his deep insight he could
        visualize all the un-Islamic notions and corrupt practices prevailing in Nejd and the countries he had
        visited. Even in Madinah, he saw people invoking the Prophet (sal) and making supplication to him. He
        decided to disseminate the True message of Islam throughout the Arabian Peninsula.

        The Sheikh found that Nejd was infested with corrupt beliefs and religious practices repugnant to the
        fundamentals of the True Religion. There were a number of graves in the Nejd area which were
        attributed to some of the Companions of the Prophet (sal). People visited these graves and invoked
        them for help in their hour of need. In Jubila they visited the grave of Zaid ibn Khattab and seeking relief
        for their needs. In Manfuha, people sought mediatiothrouga male palm-tree believing that a spinster,
        who pays a visit to it, soon gets married.

        In Dariya there was a cave which people frequented. Similarly there was grave of Dirar ibn al Azwar in
        the valley of Ghabira. It was the same story as in Basra and Zubair where people worship idols of the
        pre-Islamic period. A similar sad state of affairs prevailed in Iraq, Syria Egypt and Yemen.

        He compared all these practices in the light of the Quran and the practices of the Prophet (sal) and his
        Companions and found them far removed from and inconsistent with the religion and spirit of Islam.
        This was the sorry state of affairs not only with the people of Nejd but of other places as well, in the
        Muslim world.


        CALL FOR REVIVAL OF PURE MONOTHEISM 
        The Sheikh found that the people had abandoned their faith, and the more he studied their deviations,
        the firmer he grew in his conviction and determination that Muslims should inevitably change
        themselves and tread the path of the Pious Predecessors. The hadiths of Prophet (Sal) say as follows:

                1.`You must necessarily tread the path of those who lived before you’. 
                2.`The last hour shall not come, until some of the people of my Ummah begin to worship
                  idols.’ 
                3.`Islam was born a stranger and shall return as a stranger in similar manner.’ 

        Sheikh Muhammad had by now resolved to publicly declare unto his people that they had gone astray
        from the right path.

        He started with his call to the people in the town of Harimala, and made it clear to them, that he called
        them only unto Allah. He reminded the people that everything should be for Allah alone and that they
        should give up their wrong beliefs and practices. This naturally led to a dispute and struggle with the
        people and even with his father, who had been led away by the false sayings of the deviated followers.

        The Sheikh continued to pursue his cause undeterred by making speeches, writing as well as
        practically guiding the people. Eventually a good majority of his people accepted his views. His father
        and brother Sulaiman too were convinced after prolonged discussions. In the year 1153 A.H. his father
        Abd al Wahhab passed away.

        After the death of his father the people openly accepted the call of the Sheikh and forsook their false
        notions. They responded to the call for a return to the Sunnah of the Prophet (sal) both in words and
        deeds.

        During this time his town was dominated by two tribes both claiming leadership but none able to take
        full control and maintain justice. These tribes were in the practice of keeping slaves and indulged in
        every mischief and sin. When the Sheikh thought of admonishing them, they got wind of it and set upon
        him but were prevented by the timely action of some good people.

        The Sheikh left Harimala for his native town Aiyna, where his forefathers once lived and ruled. Here he
        met one Uthman bin Hamd bin Muammar, to whom he explained his reformist movement based on the
        Quran and Sunnah. He explained the significance of Thawheed and how much the beliefs and actions
        of the people differed from the true path. He told Uthman that if he would uphold the cause of Allah and
        his word, he would soon come to the leadership in Nejd and crowned with eternal bliss.

        Uthman responded readily to the Sheikh’s call. Here again the Sheikh urged the people to return to the
        worship of Allah only (Thawheed) and a strict adherence to the Sunnah of the Prophet (sal). The Sheikh
        managed to cut down trees that were being worshipped in the area. He succeeded with the help of
        Uthman, in bringing down the dome over the grave of Zaid ibn al Khattab. He also carried out the
        prescribed punishment for adultery on a woman who had confessed to it.

        The Sheikh and his message came to be widely known, and his reputation spread far and wide and it
        also reached Sulaiman bin Muhammad bin Urai’ir, the Governor of Ahsa and the children of Khalid.
        This impudent and ignorant man sent a letter to Uthman bin Muammir saying, “this man who is with
        you is saying this and did that, and when you receive this letter slay him, if not we shall withhold your
        kharaj (revenue} which is with us in Ahsa.” This was a tricky situation for Uthman. To oppose Urair was
        too much for him. Fearing this threat and weak in his faith ibn Muammar ordered the Sheikh to be
        banished from his town.

        The Sheikh left the town on foot escorted by a horseman through the desert in the scorching sun, with
        only the thought of Allah, until he reached Dariya as the guest of Abd al rahman bin Suwailim. Through
        ibn Suwailim most of the prominent people of Dariya came to know of the Sheikh. They visited him in
        secret and he explained to them the real meaning and the significance of Thawheed. Among those
        who visited the Sheikh were the two brothers of Prince Muhammad bin Saud. These two brothers after
        much discussion and tutoring by the Sheikh were enlightened. They explained to their brother prince
        Muhammad that Sheikh Muhammad was staying with Ibn Suwailim and that he was a blessing from
        Allah sent to them. They urged the prince to meet the Sheikh.


        PRINCE MUHAMMED BIN SAUD ACCEPTS THE SHEIKH 
        Prince Muhammad accepted the suggestion and met the Sheikh. He invited the Prince to Thawheed
        saying that it was the message, with which all the Messengers were sent by Allah. He also drew the
        attention of the Prince to the polytheistic practices and notions prevalent among the people of the Nejd.
        He wished that the Prince should assume leadership of the Muslims. The prince acceded to the wish
        of the Sheikh and offered him all help and assistance to carry out his task. He also promised to adhere
        to the Sunnah of the Prophet (sal) to command the good and to prohibit the evil.

        After the Sheikh had settled at Dariya, people began to throng to him from all sides even claiming
        kinship and accepting his Call. In the meantime Uthman ibn Muammar who exiled the Sheikh from his
        town came to know of Prince Muhammad’s acceptance of Sheikh Muhammad and his message. Now
        Uthman very much regretted what he had done to the Sheikh.

        Uthman ibn Muammar, accompanied by a large delegation came to Dariya and called on the Sheikh to
        tender their apologies. They requested the Sheikh to come back with them. He replied that it depended
        entirely on the wish of Prince Muhammad. Prince Muhammad refused to accede to their request and
        Uthman and his followers went back disappointed.


        SHEIKH GAINS A FOLLOWING 
        Now people came in large numbers to the Sheikh, seeking pure knowledge without the adulteration of
        fables and falsehood. He explained to them the real meaning of “La ilaaha illallah” and its significance.
        He stressed the importance of the negation of all false deities and the affirmation of Allah and his
        attributes.

        The Sheikh communicated with people of other cities and invited them to accept his call and join his
        movement in order to eradicate Shirk and all its abominable practices.

        Some accepted while others rejected and some even ridiculed him and accused him of sorcery. He
        continued with his mission undeterred. The opponents exerted their utmost to rally their forces to
        destroy this nascent movement by any or all means. Sheikh Muhammad and the Prince had no
        alternative but to resort to the sword to defend this movement. This war went on for many years and
        village after village fell to the new alliance. Some opponents voluntarily began to accept them when they
        realized the true nature of the movement. 

        All the efforts by the misguided group to rally their forces to destroy this nascent movement by any
        means miserably failed. After the conquest of Riyadh in 1187 A.H. the Sheikh entrusted the governing of
        the people to Prince Abdul Aziz bin Muhammad bin Saud and devoted his time to worship, learning and
        teaching. Prince Muhammad and his son Abd al Aziz always consulted him before they undertook
        anything and he gave his ruling. After an arduous struggle and having reached his goal he passed
        away in Dhul Qa’dah of 1206.


        BOOKS WRITTEN BY SHEIKH MUHAMMAD 
        The Sheikh was the author of a number of books, prominent among them being the celebrated KITAB
        AL TAWHID, which needs no introduction. The other books are Kash al Shubuhat, Thalabat al Usul,
        theMukhtasar al-Sal-Nabawiyyah, the Mukhthasar al-Insaaf, the Sharh al-Kabir fi’l Fiqh, the Nasihat
        al-Muslimin bi-ahadite Khatam al-Nabiyyin, the Kitab al-Kabair, the Ahadith al-Fitn and several other
        treatises and most of them were pertaining to the topic of Tawheed.

        It is mentioned in the work Unwan al-Majid that the Sheikh had many pupils amongst whom were his
        sons who later became eminent scholars. His four sons Hussain, Abdullah, Ali and Ibrahim
        established schools close to their homes and taught the young students from Dariya and other places.
        The fifth son had not studied under him and had died in his youth.

        Some for the students who benefited from his knowledge and rose to the position of Qadis and Muftis
        are as follows:

             Sheikh Abd al Aziz bin Abdullah al Hussein al Nasim who was a Judge in the territory of
             Al Washm.

             Sheikh Said bin Hijji who became Judge of Hauta of Bani Tamim,

             Sheikh abd al Rahman bin Nami, who became Judge of Aiyna 

             Ahsa, Shaikh Ahmad bin Rashid al-Uraini the Qadi of Sudair.

             The most notable student was Sheikh Muhammad bin Ibrahim bin Abdul Latiff bin Abdul
             Rahman bin Hassan who was the grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia.


        A SUMMARY OF THE STRUGGLE OF SHEIKH MUHAMMED 
        Due to the Sheikh’s strong views on Tawhid he was a controversial figure throughout his life and after
        his death to this day. We will reproduce here some of his communications and excerpts of treatises he
        had written for the benefit of the readers. Here is what he wrote to al-Suwaidi one of the scholars of Iraq
        in reply to his letter:

        “From Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab to his brother in faith Abd al-Rahman ibn Abdalla- Peace be
        upon you and also the Mercy and the Blessings of Allah. To continue: I am pleased to receive your
        letter. May Allah make you one of the leaders of the pious people and also one of the missionaries
        calling people to the Religion of the Chief of the Messengers. I would like to inform you that I am by the
        Grace of Allah a follower of the Pure Religion and not a Mubtadi(Innovator). My Creed and Religion with
        which I obey Allah is the same Madhab as that of the Ahl al-Sunnah wal Jama’ah and as that held by
        the leaders of the Muslims such as the four celebrated leaders of law and their followers till the day of
        resurrection.

        However, I have laid emphasis on faithfulness and sincerity in following the Religion of Allah. I have
        asked the people not to invoke the living and the dead from among the saintly and pious people
        seeking help. I have also advised them to avoid committing acts of SHIRK (associating other objects in
        the worship of Allah) while offering devotion to Allah in such matters like slaughtering for sacrifice,
        making vows, trusting in anyone or in Sujood (Prostration) and such other matters which are exclusively
        reserved for Allah alone. None is to be taken as a partner unto Allah may he be an angel or a prophet
        commissioned by him. It is he alone that all the messengers from the first to the last were ordered to
        obey and worship. This is the Madhab followed by the Ahl al Sunnah wal Jama’ah.

        I have also told the people in clear words that the first and the earliest of people who introduced acts of
        SHIRK were the Rafidah (Shia extremists) who invoked Ali and others, seeking help for their needs and
        to rid them of their afflictions.

        I hold an office in my town where people listen to me and obey me. This was disliked by some of the
        chief magnates of the town as what I said was against their traditions. I lead the people in the
        stipulated prayers and induce them to pay their Zakat and to perform other acts of devotion to Allah. I
        forbade them to indulge in RIBA, in drinking wine and all other intoxicants. The people opposed these
        corrupt leaders and rose against them. This is the Thawheed I have been commanded to preach.
        These mischievous magnates of the town began to ascribe different kinds of fabrications to me. The
        mischief flared up and they attacked us with all the armies of Satan, the cavalry and the infantry. They
        allege that I branded all the people as `Kaafirs’ except those who follow me and that I have solemnized
        their marriages in a wrong and illegal manner. I wonder how a sane man can think of and say such
        silly things. I however, declare myself free from such calumnies in the presence of Allah. Such talks can
        only emanate from the mentally deranged. In short whatsoever is mentioned about me- except that I
        invite them to Thawheed and prohibit them from committing acts of Shirk, is absolutely false.”

         MATTERS TO WHICH THE SHEIKH INVITED THE PUBLIC AND WHICH GOT HIM INTO DISPUTE WITH SOME OF
                                       THE ULEMAS:

        1.Tawhid al-Ubudiya- 
        He explained to the people that Ibadah is nothing but exclusive obedience to Allah and compliance with
        His commands. This is a comprehensive term for everything that Allah loves and such words and
        deeds He is pleased with. The forms of Ibadah (Worship) which are to be offered to Allah alone are
        many, such as Salat (Prayers), Saum (Fasting), Zakat and Sadaqah, slaughtering of sacrificial animals,
        tawaf and invocation. He said that anyone who happens to direct any of these acts to anyone other than
        Allah becomes a Mushriq as Allah the Exalted says:

             “ And whoever invokes (or worships) besides Allah any other ilah (god) of whom he has no
             proof, then his reckoning is only with his Lord. Surely Al-Kafirun (the disbelievers in the
             Oneness of Allah polytheists, pagans idolaters etc.) will not be successful.” Al Quran 23:117

        2. Tawassul – 
        This means a fervent plea and is of two types: the permitted and the prohibited. The permitted one is by
        means of faith and righteous deeds and the Glorious Names of Allah and his attributes. The prohibited
        one is entreaty using the name of the Messenger, pious people and saints. Here is what Allah the
        Exalted says: 

             “O you who believe! Be mindful of your duty towards Allah and seek the means of approach and
             strive in His cause as much as you can so that you may be successful.” Al Quran5:35

        3. Journeying to Mosques on Pilgrimage - 
        He asked the people not to undertake any pilgrimages to mosques other then the three mosques as
        given in an authentic hadith.

             “Do not undertake a journey but to the three mosques - the Sacred Mosque Makkah) my
             mosque (Madinah) and the further Mosque (Al Aqsa).”

        4. Construction over graves, covering and decorating them etc. - 
        The Sheikh openly declared that to construct buildings over the graves is unlawful. So is to shroud the
        graves with beautiful coverings and decorating them. It is prohibited to burn candles over the graves or
        to set up stone inscriptions. He also declared that it is illegal to have custodians and caretakers of
        shrines. Visiting such places tantamount to idol worship and can lead to other prohibited actions such
        as kissing them and going round them. He supported his statements with numerous hadiths
        prohibiting such constructions, visiting them and praying in them. The Shaikh quoted the hadith of Abu
        ‘l-Hayyaj al-Asadi whom Ali ibn Abi Talib asked:

             “Should I not commission you with a duty with which the Messenger of Allah had commissioned
             me-to leave no statue but to crush it, and no grave raised above the surface of the ground but to
             level it down?”

        5. Unity with respect of the Holy Names and Attributes of Allah-
        On this the Sheikh held the views of the Pious Predecessors and the four celebrated teachers of law
        and others who held the same view, namely the affirmation and recognition of the Names and
        Attributes of Allah without employing Tamtheel (finding similarity with Allah’s attributes) or Takeef. (e.g.
        To explain how Allah does some thing).

        6. Innovations-
        The Sheikh very much disliked and spoke out against innovations (Bida’) especially:

                  1. The celebration and holding of gatherings on the Prophet’s Birthday.

                  2. Making Dhikr and salawath before pronouncing the Adhan.

                  3. Verbally pronouncing the Niyyah (intention) particularly before Takbir Tahrim.

                  4. Recital of a hadith of Abu Huraira before the Khatib ascends the Minbar. (Pulpit)

        The Sheikh also abhorred and condemned the innovated practices of Tariqas (Orders), Tawassuf
        (Mysticism) and other practices which have no authority or sanction eitfrom the Messenger (sal) or from
        the Companion(R.A). Several Ulema had compiled works on this subject even before Sheikh
        Muhammad such as Ibn-Waddah, al-Turthushi and al-Shatibi on these abominable innovated
        practices and heretical actions.

        This is a short biography of the best of reformers and the greatest of Mujahids and a renowned scholar
        of Islam, whom Allah blessed with deep insight. This reform movement was initiated by Sheikh
        Muhammad and not by Sheikh Abdul Wahhab. The correct name for this movement should have been
        “al-Muhammadiya” and not “al Wahhabiya”. In the light of the above facts it is left to the reader to judge
        whether the Sheikh initiated a new madhab or was reviving the deen of the Prophet (sal), his noble
        companions and their successors.

        Indeed all Praise and thanks be to Allah the Exalted, who has graced us with the favor of preparing this life sketch of the Sheikh Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab. May Allah be merciful to him and Peace and Blessings of Allah be upon Muhammad (sal) upon his family, all his noble companions and their successors until the last day.

Jaawan


Till next time**Keep_It_Simple_Stupid**©