Decline of human intelligence

**Human intelligence ‘peaked thousands of years ago and we’ve been on an intellectual and emotional decline ever since’
**

Monday 12 November 2012

Is the human species doomed to intellectual decline? Will our intelligence ebb away in centuries to come leaving our descendants incapable of using the technology their ancestors invented? In short: will Homo be left without his sapiens?

This is the controversial hypothesis of a leading geneticist who believes that the immense capacity of the human brain to learn new tricks is under attack from an array of genetic mutations that have accumulated since people started living in cities a few thousand years ago.

Professor Gerald Crabtree, who heads a genetics laboratory at Stanford University in California, has put forward the iconoclastic idea that rather than getting cleverer, human intelligence peaked several thousand years ago and from then on there has been a slow decline in our intellectual and emotional abilities.

Although we are now surrounded by the technological and medical benefits of a scientific revolution, these have masked an underlying decline in brain power which is set to continue into the future leading to the ultimate dumbing-down of the human species, Professor Crabtree said.

His argument is based on the fact that for more than 99 per cent of human evolutionary history, we have lived as hunter-gatherer communities surviving on our wits, leading to big-brained humans. Since the invention of agriculture and cities, however, natural selection on our intellect has effective stopped and mutations have accumulated in the critical “intelligence” genes.

“I would wager that if an average citizen from Athens of 1000BC were to appear suddenly among us, he or she would be among the brightest and most intellectually alive of our colleagues and companions, with a good memory, a broad range of ideas and a clear-sighted view of important issues,” Professor Crabtree says in a provocative paper published in the journal Trends in Genetics.

“Furthermore, I would guess that he or she would be among the most emotionally stable of our friends and colleagues. I would also make this wager for the ancient inhabitants of Africa, Asia, India or the Americas, of perhaps 2,000 to 6,000 years ago,” Professor Crabtree says.

“The basis for my wager comes from new developments in genetics, anthropology, and neurobiology that make a clear prediction that our intellectual and emotional abilities are genetically surprisingly fragile,” he says.

A comparison of the genomes of parents and children has revealed that on average there are between 25 and 65 new mutations occurring in the DNA of each generation. Professor Crabtree says that this analysis predicts about 5,000 new mutations in the past 120 generations, which covers a span of about 3,000 years.

Some of these mutations, he suggests, will occur within the 2,000 to 5,000 genes that are involved in human intellectual ability, for instance by building and mapping the billions of nerve cells of the brain or producing the dozens of chemical neurotransmitters that control the junctions between these brain cells.

Life as a hunter-gatherer was probably more intellectually demanding than widely supposed, he says. “A hunter-gatherer who did not correctly conceive a solution to providing food or shelter probably died, along with his or her progeny, whereas a modern Wall Street executive that made a similar conceptual mistake would receive a substantial bonus and be a more attractive mate,” Professor Crabtree says.

However, other scientists remain sceptical. “At first sight this is a classic case of Arts Faculty science. Never mind the hypothesis, give me the data, and there aren’t any,” said Professor Steve Jones, a geneticist at University College London.

“I could just as well argue that mutations have reduced our aggression, our depression and our penis length but no journal would publish that. Why do they publish this?” Professor Jones said.

“I am an advocate of Gradgrind science – facts, facts and more facts; but we need ideas too, and this is an ideas paper although I have no idea how the idea could be tested,” he said.

THE DESCENT OF MAN
Hunter-gatherer man
The human brain and its immense capacity for knowledge evolved during this long period of prehistory when we battled against the elements

Athenian man
The invention of agriculture less than 10,000 years ago and the subsequent rise of cities such as Athens relaxed the intensive natural selection of our “intelligence genes”.
Couch-potato man
As genetic mutations increase over future generations, are we doomed to watching soap-opera repeats without knowing how to use the TV remote control?

iPad man
The fruits of science and technology enabled humans to rise above the constraints of nature and cushioned our fragile intellect from genetic mutations

Re: Decline of human intelligence

Hmm...reminds me of an experiment done in mice......where the ones that had greater obstacles to contend with in order to get food or make it from one point o another had greater dendrite connections in their brains and were smarter than the mice that had it easy.

Re: Decline of human intelligence

That logically makes sense too. I have always also noticed we are more productive and organized (in a way you can intelligent since we get more done) when we have more to do compared to when we have nothing or fewer tasks. If all one has to do is sit at home and everything will be provided they wouldn't use their brain and no new connection would be formed in the brain. So yea, I can totally understand where the article is coming from. Although one could argue what that the technological advances of the current day are far too advanced for the hunter-gatherer type of man.

Re: Decline of human intelligence

just look at the americans .

Re: Decline of human intelligence

and these days in school you are allowed to use calculators and other things that makes you use your brain less...everything is there at the push of a button...

Re: Decline of human intelligence

I love the argument put forth by the dude's haters. One guy just wants data and no idea. The other is trying to deal with his own "insecurities." The writer could have picked some saner comments that highlight the anti side.

Re: Decline of human intelligence

You can not say that human intelligence is declining as artificial intelligence is the product of human intelligence and all the action performed under artificial intelligence is possible through human intelligence as human enable those machines to work independently.

Re: Decline of human intelligence

I don’t see anything wrong with the arguments of the person critiquing Mr. Crabtree over here. Even as technology advances and societies change, there will always be some sort of struggle that the majority of the humans in the world will have to deal with because these advances are luxuries. In the grand scheme of things, only a minority of the world’s population lives a comfy life that is being implied by Crabtree. A lot of the world’s population still has to deal with immense struggles that will needs wits to survive (and thus, the people with the “best intelligence” still survive in these areas) and there are still foraging societies around the world today.

This dude needs to bring forth more to back this up.