Darwin believed in jin(super natural) or Dawkins does?

[psyah]

Re: Darwin believed in jin(super natural) or Dawkins does?

@Monk

(Not for an argument. Argument block people’s head. Ego takes over.
No one learns any thing.)

please keep your answer short. Try not to quote or address each other.
Short answer unless you really have to say some thing.

SO

did Darwin blieve in un seen ?
Do Dawkins belive in jins??

I had experience with “some thing” I wonder how evolution made “some thing”
Perhaps from invisible monkeys ???

If Dawkins don’t believe in “things” which can be arround and not be seen, he is telling me I am lair. To me his theory is bull-@#$# .

Monk Translator activated

(This thread is not being set-up for argument’s sake as arguments prevent people from thinking clearly and instigate egotistical bias preventing true academic progress and effective learning)

Please keep your answers brief and try not to quote or address each other in a manner that criticizes the individual personally
Shorter answers are better unless one really has to elaborate on a topic, otherwise please avoid the long posts.

So, without much further ado

Did Darwin actually believe in creatures of the Unseen realms?
And does Dawkins believe in Djinns?

It is my claim that I had an experience with some “thing”, but I could not see it. I wonder how evolution could be used to explain that experience?

Just like humans are said to have evolved from “monkeys”, perhaps Djinn have also evolved from invisible monkeys ???

If Dawkins doesn’t believe in “things” which are present yet can not be seen … he is effectively saying that my experience is a lie. However, to me his theory is bovine excrement.

***** End of Monk Translation*****