Re: Daroon Attack Jaiz hai:Molana Ragib Naiemi
So basically, there is a consensus across the board that an attack cannot be held back solely for fear of civilian casualties. The flag-bearers of democracy and capitalism, the Sufis, and the "wahhabis" (read: muslims) all believe so.
So basically, there is a consensus across the board that an attack cannot be held back solely for fear of civilian casualties. The flag-bearers of democracy and capitalism, the Sufis, and the "wahhabis" (read: muslims) all believe so.
Consensus among who? The talib terrorist and their mullah backers? It's funny that the mullah gang cries aloud about any civilian deaths when American forces attack the human shields used by taliban, but they themselves would kill those same civilians without even thinking twice about it. Great way to fight your fake "jihad" by killing the most number of muslims.
Re: Daroon Attack Jaiz hai:Molana Ragib Naiemi
^ Come on, you are trying too hard, even Pir Altaf Hussain has condemned the 'drowne' attacks.
^ Come on, you are trying too hard, even Pir Altaf Hussain has condemned the 'drowne' attacks.
Unlike Altaf, I support drone attacks (need some east of the indus), like most of the nationalist pushtuns themselves in the area do. Talat Hussain had a show in Peshawar were a number of pushtuns openly said they they have more faith in the accuracy of the drone attacks than in the blind artillery bombardments of the Pakistan army.
I am talking about the difference in intentionally killing the most number of civilians vs. civilians who die during regular war. I hope you don't have to try too hard to understand this.
Re: Daroon Attack Jaiz hai:Molana Ragib Naiemi
The issue is that the drone attacks are seen as infringement into Pakistan's sovereignty and consolidate the view that Pakistan's forces are fighting the American war. Eventually, all this makes it easier to brainwash people into fighting against Pakistani people/government/forces.
Re: Daroon Attack Jaiz hai:Molana Ragib Naiemi
^dont talk sense it appears a novelty almost too strange to bear.
The issue is that the drone attacks are seen as infringement into Pakistan's sovereignty and consolidate the view that Pakistan's forces are fighting the American war. Eventually, all this makes it easier to brainwash people into fighting against Pakistani people/government/forces.
No, the issue is that the tribal areas are not under the effective control of the Pakistani state and are being used to launch attacks in both Pakistan and Afghanistan. Thus, by international law standards, Pakistan has already lost control over much of the tribal areas.
Re: Daroon Attack Jaiz hai:Molana Ragib Naiemi
You were right Croquet!
Unlike Altaf, I support drone attacks (need some east of the indus), like most of the nationalist pushtuns themselves in the area do. Talat Hussain had a show in Peshawar were a number of pushtuns openly said they they have more faith in the accuracy of the drone attacks than in the blind artillery bombardments of the Pakistan army.
I am talking about the difference in intentionally killing the most number of civilians vs. civilians who die during regular war. I hope you don't have to try too hard to understand this.
Altaf is only publically denouncing them because he will loose support, otherwise you and him are on par with the levels of being a traitor is concerned.
Shameless
Altaf is only publically denouncing them because he will loose support, otherwise you and him are on par with the levels of being a traitor is concerned.
Shameless
People of NWFP who have not been brainwashed by jihadis themselves support drone attacks. Doesn't matter whether Altaf supports them or not, they will continue and expand.
So basically, there is a consensus across the board that an attack cannot be held back solely for fear of civilian casualties. The flag-bearers of democracy and capitalism, the Sufis, and the "wahhabis" (read: muslims) all believe so.
So do you want the terrorists to blow him up too like they did to the other maulana from jamia naeemia?