Cuba Reelcted to Human Rights Commission

Unblelievable, simply unbelievable.

The UN has indeed completely lost it’s voice in the world.

Anan should step down, as this sort of thing makes a mockery of the entire UN. Among the other protectors of Human Rights on this commission are Russia, Saudi Arabia and India. Don’t these countries have a few issues to clean up too? Perhaps Norway is the only country truely qualified to be on this committee, but there ought to be some MINIMAL standards here.

U.S. Enraged as Cuba Returned to U.N. Rights Body
Tue April 29, 2003 02:25 PM ET
By Irwin Arieff
UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - Cuba was reelected without opposition on Tuesday to the United Nations’ top human rights body, prompting a fierce response by Washington that it was “like putting Al Capone in charge of bank security.”

The voting took place in the 54-nation U.N. Economic and Social Council, which two years ago ousted the United States from the Human Rights Commission for the first time since Washington helped found it in 1947. The United States was returned to the body in a vote the following year.

In Washington, White House spokesman Ari Fleischer told reporters: “Cuba does not deserve a seat on the Human Rights Commission. Cuba deserves to be investigated by the Human Rights Commission.”

In the last month, the Cuban authorities have rounded up 75 dissidents and imprisoned them for terms of up to 28 years. As part of the crackdown, Cuba also executed three men who hijacked a ferry in a failed bid to reach the United States.

“Having Cuba serve again on the Human Rights Commission is like putting Al Capone in charge of bank security,” Fleischer said. “It is an inappropriate action that does not serve the cause of human rights in Cuba or at the United Nations.”

Cuba’s U.N. ambassador, Bruno Rodriguez Parrilla, accused the United States of executing minors and the mentally retarded people and abusing the rights of Afghan fighters long confined without charges in a U.S. base on Cuban territory.

Britain, whose soldiers last month invaded Iraq alongside U.S. forces, also won reelection to the Geneva-based 53-nation rights commission, easily fending off a challenge from states which opposed the war and defeating Portugal.

HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATORS

Human rights groups said this year’s elections carried on a trend of increasing domination of the commission by noted human rights violators, many of whom, like Cuba, were proposed on a regional slate without opposition.

“You have a huge powerful and very well organized bloc that doesn’t want any country criticized, opposes U.N. human rights monitoring and wants to weaken the office of the U.N. high commissioner for human rights,” Joanna Weschler of Human Rights Watch told Reuters.

“It’s almost a rule now. You get criticized by the commission or you might be, so you get a seat on the commission and you vote as a bloc against criticism,” Weschler said.

Among other members with rights records that have come under fire are Democratic Republic of Congo, Saudi Arabia, Sudan and Zimbabwe.

Countries are nominated for three-year seats on the commission through their U.N. regional groupings. most of this year’s candidates were unopposed within their group.

Seats were contested only within the Asian group and the “Western Europe and Others” group, which includes the United States, Canada, Australia and New Zealand.

Sichan Siv. U.S. ambassador to the Economic and Social Council, briefly walked out of the session following Cuba’s uncontested reelection, because, he said, Havana was “the worst violator of human rights in this hemisphere.”

Winning a three-year term on the commission were Egypt, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Nigeria, Mauritania, Bhutan, Indonesia, Nepal, Qatar, Hungary, Dominican Republic, Honduras, Italy and Netherlands.

Reelected to new three-year terms were Britain, Costa Rica, Cuba, Democratic Republic of Congo, Guatemala, India, Peru, Russia, Saudi Arabia and South Africa.

http://reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&storyID=2652771

What a joke. Stupid actions like this is what gives the UN ZERO credibility.

:rotfl:

** “You have a huge powerful and very well organized bloc that doesn’t want any country criticized, opposes U.N. human rights monitoring and wants to weaken the office of the U.N. high commissioner for human rights,” Joanna Weschler of Human Rights Watch told Reuters.

“It’s almost a rule now. You get criticized by the commission or you might be, so you get a seat on the commission and you vote as a bloc against criticism,” Weschler said. **

And then you find a group of people who wonder why some of us question the legitimacy and independence of HRW statements and reports. :mudhosh:

Voice of the people so to speak. The Re-election is by the choice of member nations. Basic Democracy. You vote for who you want. I believe the US wasnt elected the last time around. Really pissed you guys off as well. But why do you guys care? After all the UN is history.