Cricket World Cup 2003---> Pool A

Wow! What a great performance with the ball from Glenn Mcgrath - that was truly amazing - those 7 wickets for just 15 runs gives him his best ever figures and the best ever figures in World Cup history. Had he have taken just one more wicket then it would have given him the best ever Figures in Limited Overs Internation cricket - all in a days work hey?

But the batting performance wasn't all that great - granted that Australia do have a pretty good squad system (and are probably the only nation in the world capable of doing so) but sometimes i think they should leave well alone be. Michael Bevan didn't really get going at all - okay he ain't had much time at the crease but i don't think that pushing him up the order really helped at all to be honest.

Also that was Australia's 11th straight win on the bounce they have now equalled the West Indies all time record and now one more win will see them have the longest consecutive winning streak of all time in One Day Cricket - maybe that will be another factor as to what side they field against England. ;)



Australia innings (50 overs maximum)                            R   M   B  4 6
+AC Gilchrist                            b van Rooi            13  23  22  2 0
ML Hayden                                b LJ Burger           88 103  73  9 3
MG Bevan                             c & b LJ Burger           17  61  42  1 0
A Symonds             run out (Swanepoel/van Schoor)           59  78  63  2 2
*RT Ponting           c DB Kotze         b LJ Burger            2   7   9  0 0
DR Martyn                                b BL Kotze            35  55  50  2 0
DS Lehmann            not out                                  50  30  31  5 3
GB Hogg               not out                                  19  27  14  3 0
Extras                (lb 8, w 6, nb 4)                        18
Total                 (6 wickets, 50 overs, 195 mins)         301

DNB: B Lee, AJ Bichel, GD McGrath.

FoW: 1-26 (Gilchrist, 5.6 ov), 2-104 (Bevan, 19.6 ov),
     3-140 (Hayden, 23.5 ov), 4-146 (Ponting, 25.5 ov),
     5-230 (Symonds, 42.2 ov), 6-231 (Martyn, 42.5 ov).

Bowling                      O      M      R      W
van Vuuren                  10      0     92      0 (2nb, 1w)
van Rooi                     6      0     24      1 (4w)
BL Kotze                    10      0     62      1 (2nb, 1w)
LJ Burger                   10      1     39      3
DB Kotze                    10      0     54      0
AJ Burger                    4      0     22      0

Namibia innings (target: 302 runs from 50 overs)                R   M   B  4 6
AJ Burger             c Ponting          b McGrath              4   2   4  1 0
SJ Swanepoel          c Ponting          b Lee                  2  15   8  0 0
M Karg                c Gilchrist        b McGrath              4  21  14  0 0
D Keulder             c Gilchrist        b McGrath              3  26  20  0 0
BG Murgatroyd         lbw                b McGrath              0   8   3  0 0
*DB Kotze             c Gilchrist        b McGrath             10  31  14  1 0
LJ Burger             c Gilchrist        b McGrath              1  11  11  0 0
+M van Schoor         c Gilchrist        b Bichel               6  18  10  1 0
BL Kotze                                 b McGrath              0   2   3  0 0
BO van Rooi           not out                                   0   9   1  0 0
RJ van Vuuren         c Gilchrist        b Bichel               0   9   1  0 0
Extras                (lb 4, w 6, nb 5)                        15
Total                 (all out, 14 overs, 75 mins)             45

FoW: 1-5 (AJ Burger, 0.4 ov), 2-14 (Swanepoel, 3.2 ov),
     3-16 (Karg, 4.6 ov), 4-17 (Murgatroyd, 6.3 ov),
     5-28 (Keulder, 8.4 ov), 6-34 (LJ Burger, 10.5 ov),
     7-45 (DB Kotze, 12.2 ov), 8-45 (BL Kotze, 12.5 ov),
     9-45 (van Schoor, 13.5 ov), 10-45 (van Vuuren, 13.6 ov).

Bowling                      O      M      R      W
**McGrath                      7      4     15      7 (2w)**
Lee                          6      1     26      1 (5nb)
Bichel                       1      1      0      2

POOL A: THE PERMUTATIONS
Two from four
](http://www.wisden.com/misc/free/page.asp?colid=44121289)

So Australia are through - surprise surprise -** but there really is an almighty scrap for the final two places.** Not even India, victorious against England in the crunch Kingsmead clash, are safe yet. It is two from four - India, Pakistan, England and Zimbabwe - and these are the permutations for each side.

India

If India beat Pakistan in their final match - or if it is a tie or a no-result - they go through. If they lose, they will still go through unless England beat Australia. If that happens, and if Pakistan beat Zimbabwe as well, it will be two from three between Pakistan, England and India, decided on net run-rate.

Pakistan

If Pakistan win their remaining two matches (against India and Zimbabwe) they will go through - unless England beat Australia. Then, it would be two from England, India and Pakistan, decided on net run-rate.
If Pakistan beat India but lose to Zimbabwe they are out.
If they beat Zimbabwe but lose to India, they can go through only if Australia beat England. Then it would be one from England, Pakistan and Zimbabwe, decided on net run-rate.

England

England can beat Australia and go out (see India) - but they can also lose and go through. For that to happen, India need to beat Pakistan, and Pakistan to beat Zimbabwe. Then it would be one from England, Pakistan and Zimbabwe, determined on run-rate. England’s is currently the best of the three. If England do beat Australia, they still need India to beat Pakistan and Pakistan to beat Zimbabwe to guarantee them a Super Six place.

Zimbabwe

Presuming Zimbabwe beat Holland, a win over Pakistan would guarantee them a Super Six place. If they beat Holland but lose to Pakistan, they can go through only if Australia beat England and India beat Pakistan. Under those circumstances, it would be one from Zimbabwe, England and Pakistan, to be decided on net run-rate.

Wasim bhai is my hero

http://headlines.sify.com/1679news1.html?headline=Wasim~bhai~is~my~hero,~says~match-winner~Nehra

Wasim bhai is my hero, says match-winner Nehra

England have one man to blame for the World Cup defeat to India which has all but knocked them out of the tournament - Pakistani veteran Wasim Akram.

It was the lessons learnt from the great man that helped fellow left-arm seamer Ashish Nehra demolish England with 6-23, the third-best figures in the history of the tournament at Durban on Wednesday.

“Wasim bhai always told me to bowl a good line and length under floodlights and the ball would do the rest,” Nehra said. "I have spoken to him many times and follow his advice religiously.

“It would be stupid not to take Wasim bhai’s advice. He is after all the greatest left-arm fast bowler and my hero.”


Not only that Captain Ganguly once asked the Indian selectors to appoint Wasim Akram as Indian pace bowling coach. Alto’ the offer didn’t mature, it is learnt Ganguly will again place the offer as soon as Wasim Akram retires.

Guess the stupid politicians of both the countries can take a lesson from the cricketers.

** Zimbabwe V Holland**

Result: Zimbabwe won by 99 runs



Zimbabwe innings (50 overs maximum)                             R   M   B  4 6
CB Wishart            c Smits            b Lefebvre            21  21  21  4 0
MA Vermeulen                             b Kloppenburg         27  70  62  4 0
A Flower              c Esmeijer         b Schiferli           71 114  72  7 0
GJ Whittall           c Zuiderent        b Kloppenburg         30  41  37  2 1
DD Ebrahim                               b de Leede            32  87  41  1 0
AM Blignaut           c Kloppenburg      b Schiferli           58  49  38  7 0
*HH Streak            c Esmeijer         b de Leede            44  23  22  6 1
DA Marillier          lbw                b Lefebvre             1   4   2  0 0
+T Taibu              not out                                   7   5   5  0 0
Extras                (lb 3, w 7)                              10
Total                 (8 wickets, 50 overs, 210 mins)         301

DNB: BA Murphy, Douglas T Hondo.

FoW: 1-24 (Wishart, 5.6 ov), 2-82 (Vermeulen, 19.1 ov),
     3-135 (Whittall, 29.3 ov), 4-165 (Flower, 34.2 ov),
     5-245 (Blignaut, 44.3 ov), 6-274 (Ebrahim, 47.3 ov),
     7-281 (Marillier, 48.2 ov), 8-301 (Streak, 49.6 ov).

Bowling                      O      M      R      W
Schiferli                   10      2     43      2 (1w)
Lefebvre                     8      0     38      2 (3w)
de Leede                     7      0     69      2
Kloppenburg                 10      0     40      2
Esmeijer                     9      0     60      0 (1w)
van Bunge                    3      0     22      0 (1w)
Mol                          3      0     26      0 (1w)

Netherlands innings (target: 302 runs from 50 overs)            R   M   B  4 6
JF Kloppenburg        c Streak           b Hondo               18  78  56  2 0
E Schiferli                              b Streak              22  51  27  3 0
B Zuiderent           run out (Ebrahim/Taibu)                  15  56  31  0 1
DLS van Bunge         lbw                b Whittall            37  67  47  5 0
TBM de Leede          lbw                b Murphy               1   4   2  0 0
LP van Troost         c Hondo            b Murphy              26  25  25  2 1
RH Scholte            c Blignaut         b Murphy               7  29  26  0 0
HJC Mol               c sub (HK Olonga)  b Marillier           23  55  40  2 0
*RP Lefebvre                             b Marillier           30  25  23  4 1
+J Smits              not out                                   8  17  11  0 0
JJ Esmeijer           not out                                   3  10  13  0 0
Extras                (b 1, lb 7, w 3, nb 1)                   12
Total                 (9 wickets, 50 overs, 213 mins)         202

FoW: 1-41 (Schiferli, 11.1 ov), 2-49 (Kloppenburg, 16.2 ov),
     3-80 (Zuiderent, 23.1 ov), 4-85 (de Leede, 24.1 ov),
     5-127 (van Troost, 30.3 ov), 6-128 (van Bunge, 31.5 ov),
     7-148 (Scholte, 38.1 ov), 8-190 (Lefebvre, 44.6 ov),
     9-191 (Mol, 46.4 ov).

Bowling                      O      M      R      W
Blignaut                    10      1     30      0 (1w)
Streak                      10      1     36      1
Hondo                        6      1     16      1
Murphy                      10      3     44      3 (1nb)
Marillier                    9      0     49      2 (1w)
Whittall                     5      1     19      1 (1w)



Group A



Pos. Team   P W L No res. Tied Pts. Net run rate 
1 Australia   5  5  -  -  -  20  +2.493  
2 India       5  4  1  -  -  16  +1.279  
3 England     5  3  2  -  -  12  +1.073  
4 Zimbabwe    5  3  2  -  -  12  +0.504  
5 Pakistan    4  2  2  -  -  8  +0.392  
6 Namibia      5  -  5  -  -  0  -3.326  
7 Netherlands 5  -  5  -  -  0  -2.038  

Gangu Teli <=== :rotfl:

Good to see Zimbabwe’s runrate not very far from Zim. England should lose to Australia with say 70-80 runs thier net runrate will drop to something around 0.8 and if Pakistan can repeat the win of 90 odd runs, we will qualify Even if we lose against indians BUT indians se bhi kyun haarain?? :jhanda:

Re: Wasim bhai is my hero

Good post.I hope people will learn.

Champoo analysis: :stuck_out_tongue:

How come England be on the third spot since Zimbabwe able to score more than 300 runs not once but twice?

Don’t you ever make no mistake. :wink:

CLICK HERE

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Pakistani Tiger: *

Champoo analysis: :p

How come England be on the third spot since Zimbabwe able to score more than 300 runs not once but twice?

Don't you ever make no mistake. ;)
[/QUOTE]

That match of Zimbabwe was ran effected..so There full score cannot be taken into account while calculating NRR. Only those run which were given as target to Namibia will matter here.Thats why they have less NRR.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by andha_qanoon: *
Only those run which were given as target to Namibia will matter here.Thats why they have less NRR.
[/QUOTE]

ahem

How about NRR of Zimbabwe with Holland?

Something ain't right here. :p

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Pakistani Tiger: *

ahem

How about NRR of Zimbabwe with Holland?

Something ain't right here. :p
[/QUOTE]

That is included.
Its correct.why dont u look at all there matches and calculate it urself.
Engand also had good scores if not 300ish.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by andha_qanoon: *

That is included.
Its correct.why dont u look at all there matches and calculate it urself.
Engand also had good scores if not 300ish.
[/QUOTE]

If you see, Zimbabwe have scored more than England -->340(Namibia), 301(Holland), 172(India) and 246(Australia).

Then, of course as we know everyone else have different opinion. :)

My position is on Zimbabwe. Rest Allah(SWT) knows best.

Ciao,

PT.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Pakistani Tiger: *

If you see, Zimbabwe have scored more than England -->340(Namibia), 301(Holland), 172(India) and 246(Australia).

Then, of course as we know everyone else have different opinion. :)

My position is on Zimbabwe. Rest Allah(SWT) knows best.

Ciao,

PT.
[/QUOTE]

its NRR not RR.It also depends on how much your opposition scores. :)

[QUOTE]
Originally posted by saby: *
Good to see **Zimbabwe's
* runrate not very far from Zim.
[/QUOTE]

Thats a given. :)

NRR tau baad ki baat hai.. If the points are equal, than the team which beat the other team in head-to-head in the group match will move forward. So, if it comes to between England and Pakistan... then ticket katao, line banao!

Javed Miandad Speak on Match

India and Pakistan play each other after almost three years. How do you view the game between the two arch-rivals?

It will be a very good game, a pressure game. India is in a good position compared to Pakistan because they have qualified for the Super Sixes. So the pressure will be on Pakistan, who have forgotten how to bat. If they lose to India they will have to face the fury of the people back home and also face an early knockout from the tournament.
**
What is your prediction for the match? **

The Indian morale is high so they won’t mind losing because they are through. If this was a do-or-die situation their legs would have been shaking right now. But I still think India will win.
**
What is going wrong with Pakistan?**

Their batting is just not clicking. Inzamam-ul Haq, who is the key player, is going through the worst form of his life. I have known him ever since he was an upcoming player. I used to give him a lot of practice in the nets. Now he is a much improved batsman. We rely a lot on bowling, but the batsmen are just not giving them any runs to defend.
**
Do you agree that Waqar Younis is the weak link in the bowling? Should he stand down for Saturday’s game?**

It is too late now to make that change, even if I agree with it. Mohammad Sami has not played for a long time and it will be unfair to ask him to play against India without match practice. Forget Waqar, the whole team is not doing well.

**
If you were coach of the side, what would you suggest to them?**

I have always maintained that a good start is important. Inzamam or Yousuf Youhana have to take the responsibility of scoring heavily. We must look at the game first instead of the opposition. The wickets in South Africa are different from the ones back home. I don’t understand why there are so many reshuffles in the batting order. None of the batsmen has confidence.
**
What would your side be for the game against India?**

I would drop Saeed Anwar because his confidence is shaken. Things are not going well for him. He is not timing the ball the way he used to. Nothing is sure about his batting. I would open with Saleem Elahi and Taufiq Umar, then bring in Abdul Razzaq at number three and follow with Inzamam, Youhana, Younis Khan and Rashid Latif followed by the bowlers. Shahid Afridi would be my twelfth man. :k:

I believe that when you play you must assess the bowler, not his reputation, and play on the merit of the ball. You have to be confident and play according to the situation.

**
Isn’t it a pity that India and Pakistan don’t play as much?**

Hamare politicians ne saara panga kar rakha hai (our politicians have created this mess). They have brought politics into sports. It is their nature to bring up negative things and gain publicity. There is no problem between the people of the two countries. Despite threats in 1998-99 we came to India and found that we were so well received. People were happy to see us. I missed the fact that we did not play in Bombay. I feel bad for the poor people that they could not see their idols play their main rivals in the cricket-loving city of Bombay.
**
What do you suggest should be done?**

The tension that has been created is because the two countries are playing after such a long time. We should play more regularly. The better side will always win, but so will the sport. We will be able to produce better cricketers playing each other. India will learn the art of producing fast bowlers while we could learn the art of batting. We should have regular under-15 and under-19 tours. The travelling would cost less, the confidence and experience of playing across the borders would be great.

I wish India comes to play in Sharjah again. With India not playing there who is affected? The former cricketers who played at a time when there was not so much money. The benefit matches give them a chance to get financial benefits for their contribution to the game. The reason India has given for not coming to Sharjah is ridiculous. Match-fixing happens everywhere. Those who want to do it will do it anyway. And India is the main place for match-fixing anyway.
**
What is your reaction to Shoaib Akhtar breaking the 100mph barrier?**

Good for him. But I prefer that he wins games for Pakistan instead of promoting himself. Look at Glenn McGrath and Jason Gillespie. They don’t touch 95mph, and yet look at their record. The world remembers you for your performances, not your 100mph speed. Why is Sachin Tendulkar the greatest batsman? Simply because of his performance. I played for so many years because of my performance. :k:
**
Can you relive the run-in with Kiran More in the 1992 World Cup?
**
It was so long ago. So many things were happening that night. The pressure was building on me to get some runs and he was appealing like mad. So I jumped like he had and then asked him why he begs the umpire instead of just appealing. I was suffering from a virus infection in my stomach and that was making batting more difficult. But I still jumped to mock him. It was funny.

Mr Miandad was dead right, the batting was the difference between the 2 sides, India were just amazing.

^–explosive in the start and methodical and goal-oriented later on..to be precise :k:

As I said before..I don’t know much about the cricket match. But India is just cooler…:smokin: