Credit goes to an Indian.

[chacha_Ghalib]

Re: Credit goes to an Indian.

@diwana

OK. Maybe you did not mean it but it came out this way.

East India company was a British company. Not Indian. Not related to hindu or muslims.

You gave example of missiles which are named against India with the context of muslim warriors. So two opposite religions.

Giving example of missiles were wrong in two ways.

1- EIC was related to neither muslims nor hindus. A third party. An Indian hindu decided to make his company named after it.

2- But missiles are the issues between Pakistan and India with names after muslim warriors. It has been discussed before why Pakistan feels good for naming these missiles.

What is the excuse for this Indian?

P.S. I think I know why you used the word mutiny.

This post of yours made absolutely no sense to me even after reading it a couple of times. i still don’t see where you’re coming from but i’ll try one last time.

What i’m saying about the topic is that it doesn’t bother me at all that he names his company EIC, which was a good move on his part seeing the kind of publicity it got him.

Then I try to show our hypocrisy for being outraged about this. EIC and muslim conquerers both had something in common: they took over the local population by hook or by crook. We happily name stuff after the muslim wariors. I don’t see the hindu specific connection you keep referring to. For your info, not all the conquerers attacked and sacked hindu kingdoms… most of them attacked muslim kingdoms already established in the subcontinent.

The excuse for this indian is that he wants publicity… what’s your issue with him naming his company what he wants?

you think you know? of course you do caz you are god and know what’s in my heart.
a pointer for you… what was the result of the so-called war of independence?