Cowasjee: At the bottom of the sea.

I don’t beleive that I have ever read a more discouraging article from Cowasjee than the one that appeared in dawn today. I hope some of the jihadis read it carefully, and decide if that is what we want for Pakistan the world over?


http://www.dawn.com/weekly/cowas/cowas.htm
‘At the bottom of the sea’

By Ardeshir Cowasjee

“I long for the day when I’ll be able to see Indian ships manned by Indians sailing in Indian waters and carrying all of India’s cargoes.” So said Walchand Hirachand, a merchant prince of Bombay, in the later 1920s. Thus, he, two other Bombay merchants, Narottam Morarji and M A Master, and F E Dinshaw, Maharaja Scindia of Gwalior’s financial adviser, got together, pooled their resources, fought the predominantly British interests, and formed the Scindia Steam Navigation Company. Their first ship was named Loyalty.

When the SS Loyalty arrived in Karachi, the new company was somewhat strapped for funds. Scindia’s stevedores and coal bunkerers were Cowasjee & Sons, headed then by two brothers, Fakirjee and Minocher Cowasjee. They serviced the vessel with no charge telling Scindia ‘pay when you can’.

Some twenty years later, in 1946, a man named Mohammad Ali Jinnah, then in Bombay, told his confidant, Yusuf Abdullah Haroon (still very much with us), that he wished to meet Rustom Fakirjee Cowasjee of Karachi and asked Yusuf to request Cowasjee to come to Bombay to talk to him as he was interested in buying and expanding his family shipping firm, East & West Steamship Company. Jinnah’s reasoning was that Pakistan, when it came into being, would need ships. He wished to establish a Pakistani public limited ship owning company with a fleet of a hundred ships.

So, Rustom Cowasjee went to Bombay and met Jinnah. Why buy my company, said Rustom to Jinnah. Pakistan will need many ships and many companies. I will start the ball rolling and form a large company for you. Fair enough, said Jinnah, and summoned Muhammad Ali Habib of Habib Bank of Bombay. Find the finances, he told him, and get going. They did and the result was the formation of the Muhammadi Steamship Company Limited. The day Pakistan was born, on August 14, 1947, Rustom Cowasjee and Muhamamd Ali Habib were in London arranging to acquire ships.

Many ship-owning companies came into being over the years and Pakistan by the late 1960s to early 1970s had its flag flying on just under a hundred vessels. Jinnah’s wish had been fulfilled. But what Mohammad Ali Jinnah had not foreseen was that in 1974, a prime minister of Pakistan would, on New Year’s Day, destroy the entire ship owning business of Pakistan by nationalizing all the ship-owning companies built up over a quarter of a century. Now, in 2002, Pakistan, a maritime nation with a coastline of almost a thousand miles, has not one single ship owned by the private sector. The governments which followed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto’s nationalizing government did their best to revive private ship- owning in Pakistan, but their half-baked policies never gelled.

The government-owned Pakistan National Shipping Corporation (PNSC) today owns eleven 22-year-old redundant dry cargo ships, three container vessels (which each lose some $6,000 a day) and one 27-year-old tanker. The residual life of this grand fleet is two to three years. The corporation has devoured billions of rupees belonging to the people of Pakistan and the shareholders’ equity has been wiped out by accumulated losses.

Pakistan imports some 19 million tons of oil and petroleum products. This government, in its finite wisdom, in the form of the ministers of petroleum and communications, have forced the three refineries of Pakistan to sign up with the PNSC a ten-year affreightment contract with the refineries (which means us, the people) which forces them into paying almost double the market freight rate of what the rate will be over the ten-year period. According to the national shipping policy, the first preference for all Pakistani cargoes is to be given to the PNSC. In any case, for all intents and purposes, private ship owning in Pakistan is sunk.

Having lost our ships, all we had left was seafarers - a well-trained bunch of officers who are well liked by foreign ship-owners and many seamen who are not so well liked because of their beliefs and tendencies. We Pakistanis are now an endangered species. Signals, such as the one reproduced hereunder, to vessels docking at foreign ports (in this case Singapore) carrying Pakistanis crews are common.

“To Master Sea Bright. F M Stadsons Shipping and Trading Pte Ltd - LEK. View Pakistani and Bangladeshi crew. Free pratique not granted. Please proceed to pilot eastern boarding ground Alpha for compulsory pilot shifting vessel to western immigration quarantine anchorage (WIQA) for immigration physical attendance. Tlx portmaster Rs 23,333 one day prior arrival. VHF port operation on Ch/10 five hours before arrival yr/ETA P/Stn requesting pilot attendance. Upon pilot boarding pls VHF Ch/14 for immigration officer attendance advising yr ETA (WIQA) and have ready 14 pcs of crew list for endorsement. After immigration physical attendance, pls VHF pilot again for shifting vessel to western working anchorage for repairs/etc. Keep us closely advised yr ETA. Please note: all crew members are not permitted to come ashore for shopping/etc during the entire stay of the vessel.”

Fairplay International Shipping Weekly which is read by every owner and agent all over the world on September 5 came out with a cover on which was the exclamation: ‘Keep out! Doors shut on Pakistanis.’ One story inside is headed “The criminalization of Pakistani seafarers - New rules at home and abroad damage reputations,” and the sub-heading reads: “It’s been the dark but open secret of shipping since the US declared its ‘war on terrorism’, but few dare mention it. Governments won’t admit it but there is no denying that even experienced Pakistani seafarers, by dint of being one of a handful of nationalities unofficially deemed ‘potentially terrorist’, are fast becoming the outcasts of the oceans.” Another story carries the heading: "Someone rigged the system! Heads will roll, promises Pakistan’s minister. ‘I am not going to spare these *****s’!"
**
It is widely known abroad that most Pakistanis consider themselves to be soldiers of God on a divine mission and take it upon themselves to do unbidden whatever they deem necessary to protect His interest. The ministry of communications has awoken and are holding a seminar on the subject of Fairplay magazine.
This government, placed as it is, will neither have the time nor the inclination to solve the problems of our seafarers. We can only hope that Musharraf will choose more competent ministers to head the communications and petroleum ministries in the new government to come. The general secretary of the Pakistan Merchant Navy Officers’ Association, writing to the petroleum minister on October 18, invoked a plea: “May Allah give you the vision, wisdom, courage and guidance to streamline the affairs in your ministry.”

By the grace of God, we rest in peace at the bottom of the sea.

Old lahori, either you cannot read or too blinded with your hatred against mujahideens, I didn't see a single reference against the jihadis in this article. Cowasjee can go and jump in sea, if the economic revival policies irk him so much. Just my humble opinion.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Abdullah k: *
Old lahori, either you cannot read or too blinded with your hatred against mujahideens, I didn't see a single reference against the jihadis in this article. Cowasjee can go and jump in sea, if the economic revival policies irk him so much. Just my humble opinion.
[/QUOTE]

Who do you think he means by soldiers of God? I don't have hatred against mujahideens. I am baffled by those who want to pick a fight against the whole world, i.e. against the US, Russia, Europe, Australia, China, India, etc. He is not irked by the revival policies. He is stating facts about what happened to the Shipping Industry, how Paksitanis are being viewed in that Industry, and what is being done to revive that Industry. Look up what has happened to the number of Pakistani Students being allowed into Australia, Europe, and USA in the last year!! I can tell the numbers are not pretty!

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Abdullah k: *
Old lahori, either you cannot read or too blinded with your hatred against mujahideens, I didn't see a single reference against the jihadis in this article.

[/QUOTE]

Neither can I. But this is once again oldlahori getting excited over something he thinks he read that showed Pakistani's in a negative light, and he posts it without thinking. Just like that Kuwaiti teen story the other week. But he has to say negative things or point out supposed negative things about Pakistan, to prove his loyalty to a place that will never fully accept him. Sad.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Malik73: *

Neither can I. But this is once again oldlahori getting excited over something he thinks he read that showed Pakistani's in a negative light, and he posts it without thinking. Just like that Kuwaiti teen story the other week. But he has to say negative things or point out supposed negative things about Pakistan, to prove his loyalty to a place that will never fully accept him. Sad.
[/QUOTE]

Yes if what Cowasjee writes and Educated and Intelligent Pakistanis like yourself have only this to feel, then it is truly sad. More sad than I ever imagined. Just caring whether pakistan "appears" in good light or bad. Read what he has to say, and try to think a little.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by OldLahori: *

Read what he has to say, and try to think a little.
[/QUOTE]

I think that applies to you. Try reading things carefully, before jumping to conclusions and trying to do down Pakistani's at every turn - remember that lousy Kuwaiti story the other week you posted? Don't try so hard on proving your belonging to another place, by doing down Pakistan and Pakistani's, cause in the end it won't get you far.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Malik73: *

I think that applies to you. Try reading things carefully, before jumping to conclusions and trying to do down Pakistani's at every turn - remember that lousy Kuwaiti story the other week you posted? Don't try so hard on proving your belonging to another place, by doing down Pakistan and Pakistani's, cause in the end it won't get you far.
[/QUOTE]

Sher-e-Pakistan regardless of my psychology, read what Cowasjee writes. He was respected by Quaid for his honesty. Cowasjee is over 80 years old now, and he has never written to please anyone. If you have any well wishes for Pakistan, read his story and think a little. I am addressing other well wishers of Pakistan. Again if you want a feel good fairy tale that Pakistan Politicians weave for the masses in Pakistan, then I am sorry I cannot oblige. Pakistan is going through a rough patch, and it needs a clear assesment of what and where it is especially by its educated and intelligent well wishers.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by OldLahori: *

Pakistan is going through a rough patch, and it needs a clear assesment of what and where it is especially by its educated and intelligent well wishers.
[/QUOTE]

It needs people to be balanced and factual i.e. not misleading about Pakistan - to address the negatives and the postives. You are only into pointing out anything supposedly slightly negative about Pakistan, but never highlight the positive. That is quite obviously done to prove your loyalty to another place, a fact that most people are now fully aware of in this forum. Pathetic.

P.S. My criticisms are directed at you, not Cowasajee.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Malik73: *

It needs people to be balanced and factual i.e. not misleading about Pakistan - to address the negatives and the postives. You are only into pointing out anything supposedly slightly negative about Pakistan, but never highlight the positive. That is quite obviously done to prove your loyalty to another place, a fact that most people are now fully aware of in this forum. Pathetic.

P.S. My criticisms are directed at you, not Cowasajee.
[/QUOTE]

Ok sher ji whatever makes you happy.

I did not read this thread, but did they find Cowasjee's body in the ocean?

Old Lahori, what's the corelation between the PNSC oil tankers and the Pakistani students who have been denied visas into foreign countries :D If you want to debate about the fair treatment towards all oil careers, then by all means do. But, please try to put some sense in your posts.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Abdullah k: *
Old Lahori, what's the corelation between the PNSC oil tankers and the Pakistani students who have been denied visas into foreign countries :D If you want to debate about the fair treatment towards all oil careers, then by all means do. But, please try to put some sense in your posts.
[/QUOTE]

Abdullah: Why would a ship not be allowed to dock just because it has pakistani seamen on board? Why would a ship be asked to dock in a security area just because it has pakistani seamen on board? This is what the article says as a lead article in an international shipping magazine:

'Keep out! Doors shut on Pakistanis.' One story inside is headed "The criminalization of Pakistani seafarers - New rules at home and abroad damage reputations," and the sub-heading reads: "It's been the dark but open secret of shipping since the US declared its 'war on terrorism', but few dare mention it. Governments won't admit it but there is no denying that even experienced Pakistani seafarers, by dint of being one of a handful of nationalities unofficially deemed 'potentially terrorist', are fast becoming the outcasts of the oceans."

The same reputation has followed the pakistani student. You don't find is being broadcast but the statistics speak out loud and clear. The university where I am at, every year we used to get somewhere between 10 to 20 students from pakistan. This fall not one was allowed in by the immigration. I also inquired at Stanford and UCLA, UC berkeley, and I got similar numbers. Not one. I know there are guppies at UCLA atleast and perhaps they can tell me whether I am right or not. This bothers me a lot.

Your concerns are appreciated, but coming back to the original notion. The demise of ship-breaking industries more has to do with ill-management over the past years; as the author tries to reveal. His primary concerns are obviously pointing towards aspiration of fair treatment by the communication and petrolium ministries. But, you can derive whatever you please out if this article.

Cut out the foul language, and stick to the topic of this thread