Re: Conquest of India Prior to the Day of Judgement
Yes in Gujarat and Kashmir, that's why the narration/hadith will come true and the leaders of Shiv-Sena, VHP, BJP, RSS, HSS, Bajrang-Dal, Arya-Samaj, leaders of Indian army/goverment who persecute (or plan on persecuting) Muslims and others in Kashmir, Punjab and Gujarat will be put in chains and the people of South-Asia (Muslims, Hindus etc..) will live happily ever after.. :p
Re: Conquest of India Prior to the Day of Judgement
WHAT…dont you know that it is muslims who are trying to liberate us from eternal hell fires after we die:smilestar:. everybody is born sinless. There is noooo selfishness involved in allll of their wars:smilestar:. everything is sanctioned by God:smilestar:
Re: Conquest of India Prior to the Day of Judgement
Would like to know if the author of Islam had any information of eastern religions....Sanatan, Buddhism, Jainism, or he even knew about the eastern countries......... or the core comflict was against Jews and people of the book whom he had seen all around???
Frankly speaking the thread is totally useless, and do not understand how the mods take action in only some particular conditions.
Spreading such fake stories dedicated to the Prophet is an insult and un-Islamic.
Re: Conquest of India Prior to the Day of Judgement
author of islam having any information of other faiths???
…there is no such thing as having any information in islam…allah said and the author wrote it down:smilestar:..dont you know?
Re: Conquest of India Prior to the Day of Judgement
oyelaaa.......such a happy news. particularly the last part. after "liberating" we all will live happily ever afterrrrrr like in iraq, sudan, afghanistan ......................
Re: Conquest of India Prior to the Day of Judgement
Wasn't India already conquered by the various Sultanates and later the Mughal Empire? They took control of all the land by the Hindus (Indus) River.
Re: Conquest of India Prior to the Day of Judgement
YOU IDIOT…islams scriptures are uncorrupted:smilestar: …there are no fake stories!
Re: Conquest of India Prior to the Day of Judgement
So the conquest already happened long time back....hmmm
Re: Conquest of India Prior to the Day of Judgement
i think the ahadis are deliberately vague and leave out details. conquering india is no biggie its been done by Muslims many times.
Re: Conquest of India Prior to the Day of Judgement
So who is going to do that, the great islamic republic of pakistan!!!. :p.
Re: Conquest of India Prior to the Day of Judgement
This is a misnomer.
Unfortunately, Muslims have a habit of glorifying any Muslim King/ruler/Caliph/warlord since early Islam till to date who led an army and conquered different [Muslim or non-Muslim] territories in the name of Islam and Jihad. Most of them were imposters, dictators and murderers who had no respect for the religion, its values and people. They used the name of religion to capture foreign lands [for money]. The battles those followed resulted in the killings of thousands of people. Its had been so among Muslims throughout the history.
The example of a tyrant and oppressor like Hajjaj bin Yousaf sending his nephew Muhammad bin Qasim to conquer India because of a Muslim woman is a travesty of logic and history. The man who killed and ordered to kill thousands of his opponents [religious/political] in his own country would care a damn about a Muslim woman allegedly held by Raja Dahir. Hajjaj and his stooges were finding a reason to invade India and any such oppurtunity couldn't be left unseized, and thats exactly what happened. Read History of Sindh written by scholars of ALL backgrounds, not just Muslim historians who paint a rosy picture of Muslim warlords of history.
The example of Tariq bin Ziyad and Musa bin Nusayr invading Spain/Undalas is no more different from this Indian example. Just find out WHY did Berbers and an army from Arabia first attacked Visigoth government in Undalas.
It can be anything but Jihad.
No, I'm not an Indian and yes I'm a Muslim.
Blessed be. . .
Re: Conquest of India Prior to the Day of Judgement
^ you hit the nail right on the head ,
but I would disagree to a certain extent I think offensive wars are allowed in Islam but it really depends on who is leading them and what they seek to achieve.
so if they are good practicising muslims ,sincere in spreading the faith [encouraging conversion], distributing wealth like in the times of RasoolAllah(SAW) and keeping minorities in their place, then they should be valid as this also happened in the time of RaulAllah[pbuh]
Clearly these dynasties were far from this example
however it should be kept in mind that many soldiers of the rank and file genuinely participated in wars out of religious zeal and the rulers were great in manipulating that for their own purposes and posing as "defenders of the faith " the religious clergy of the time gave them their blessing as well [either by bribery or simply intimidation]
Also many pious individuals tired of living under the repressive rule of these kings went to the Warfront to die a honorable death.
muslim historians have not spared hajjaj from any condemnation either
it is only our homegrown desi "experts" who cook up such stories to fool the ignorant masses.What these so-called followers of sahaba conveniantly forget is that hajjaj is the one who crucified and left the corpse of abdullah b zubair[a sahabi] on the gallows
and regarding his "respect for muslim women" we can refer to his
conversation with the mother of ibn zubair daughter of Abu Bakr[ra]
Re: Conquest of India Prior to the Day of Judgement
some questions i sincerely dont know the answer
why were hindus [polytheist] granted dhimmi status in india ?
any example from life of the Prophet(saw)?
What did muslim kings do to encourage conversions to Islam [apart from few like aurangzaib ]
is coexistence with idolworshippers like hindus allowed in a islamic state ?...examples plz from pious caliphate too if possible
Re: Conquest of India Prior to the Day of Judgement
Salamz,
The author of this article has been convicted of terrorism in the US and is currently serving a life sentence in Virginia. I'd be reluctant to take anything a terrorist says at face value.
Re: Conquest of India Prior to the Day of Judgement
Any guess from where did qasim came from????.......;)....it is iraq!
his father-in-law was a great tyrant to the people of iraq just like a medevial saddam
Re: Conquest of India Prior to the Day of Judgement
History is written by winners. If by some miracle America ends up winning in Iraq, then don't be shocked if history says that Bush sent troops to Iraq to defend the honor of Christian women.
Re: Conquest of India Prior to the Day of Judgement
^ you are missing the point ...the winners i.e the muslim historians themselves have been most critical of these tyrants ....
Re: Conquest of India Prior to the Day of Judgement
*Conquest of India…prior to the **DAY OF JUDGEMENT:confused: ***
hmmm…
Surely, a Bedouin tribal must have written this $h!t…jealous of India, or probably he wants a few Indian virgin girls…
Muslim invaders couldn’t convert, or kill all the Hindus- there were too many of them and were powerful too. well, this is what I’ve heard. i’m no scholar
Re: Conquest of India Prior to the Day of Judgement
Why there are no hadees regarding the conquest of Australia, New Zealand, Azteca, the Carribean, the Antartica, Ecuador, Argentina, Canada/America! Even surprisingly Japan, Korea and China have been missed out!
Re: Conquest of India Prior to the Day of Judgement
slight misinterpretation makes it more ensible - it shoud read "after conquering India they return to syriana".....