Re: Conquest of India Prior to the Day of Judgement
[quote=Toloo-e-Aftob]
meray bhai this lad of 17 had a disciple of Abdullah ibn abbas [ra] called Attiyyah ibn sa'd [ra] whipped because he refused to curse Ali ibn abutalib[as]
what twisted facts ? you think the crusaders invented the crimes of ummayyads and likes of hajjaj ....what kind of delusional world do you live in? our historians have recorded them in great detail
is greatness in recounting the battlefield exploits of disgraceful men who killed the best of the ummah and enslaved the others , pillaged the holy places of Islam? or do you admire the sassanians and byzantines where the biggest thug became the most respectable and sat on the throne.
..
yes i agree hindu bohat maakar hotay hain ....[plz refer to the thread i started about why dhimmi status was given to hindus when idolaters should be given choice of conversion or war ] but this does not mean that we start defending the conduct of people like hajjaj ....waging war against hindus was legitimate but men like him should never have been put in charge as they fought for worldly gain not for spreading the faith
thoda pad likh liye hote to tumhari aisi soch nahin hoti.