Congo's war refuses to end

i have been searching for hours - literally - for a positive news story about Africa. i found a couple, but more suitable perhaps for the Culture Forum.
At any rate, here is a news article regarding Congo; sadly i don’t know much about this issue. Is Rwanda still supporting the rebel factions in the DRC - wasn’t there supposed to have been some sort of agreement that was signed a couple of months ago, by both sides? Or am i mistaken again?

Congo’s war refuses to end, Rory Carroll, Mail & Guardian, 3 March 2003

Pro-government forces have slaughtered hundreds of civilians in the Democratic Republic of Congo in one of the worst massacres since a peace deal was signed, rebels claimed yesterday.

A coalition of loyalist troops, tribal militia and Ugandan army soldiers rampaged for two days last week in Bogoro, south of the town of Bunia which is near the Ugandan border, according to Thomas Lubanga, leader of the Union des Patriotes Congolais (UPC), a small rebel group backed by Rwanda.

“Until yesterday we had counted up to 467 people had been killed. We’re still receiving more reports today. They were all civilians,” Lubanga told Reuters.

A rival rebel group, RCD-Kisangani, also said there had been a massacre but said the toll was 250 and rising. An official from the United Nations mission in Congo (Monuc) confirmed there was an attack and said the higher death toll “could be true”.

The war, which has devastated the vast central African country for the past four years, is supposed to be winding down, following accords between neighbouring coun tries which became involved, as well as between Congolese factions.

However, fighting in Ituri province in the north-east has continued, as different groups vie for control in a power vacuum, sending tens of thousands of people fleeing their homes in recent months.

More than a million civilians are thought to have died in the war, most through disease and hunger, but many as the victims of massacres. There was often confusion and doubt over which of the myriad groups were responsible.

Rwanda and Uganda have denied breaching the accords but sceptics say both countries are still hooked on plundering a chaotic neighbour rich in diamonds, gold and other mineral reserves.

Residents of Bunia said Ugandan troop reinforcements arrived in recent weeks following heightened tension with the UPC rebels.

Most foreign troops have withdrawn but Uganda still has some 2000 soldiers, who are due to withdraw by March 20. Uganda’s defence minister, Amama Mbabazi, denied having any troops in the area of the recent fighting or knowing anything of massacred civilians. “I don’t have those reports,” he said.

Diplomatic cables seen by Africa Confidential, a London-based newsletter, have accused Uganda and Rwanda of delivering fresh arms to their proxy militias in defiance of the South African-brokered peace accord signed in Pretoria last September.

Rwanda, in particular, is said to have actively undermined the accord by using Russian cargo planes to airlift heavy weapons to Lubanga’s UPC rebels.

In the absence of independent observers on the ground it is difficult to verify the claims. The UN force of 5 000 can cover only a small fraction of the country, though its reach will improve following the security council’s recent approval of an extra 3700 soldiers and its promise to accelerate their deployment in the eastern flashpoints.

The latest reported massacre will deepen scepticism about the viability of the peace deal. Some rebel factions suspect President Joseph Kabila of trying to derail the accord by delaying the launch of an all-party transitional government.

Uganda and Rwanda invaded Congo in 1998 to lend support to rebels fighting the government. The war in Congo sucked in a number of other foreign armies, including those of Angola, Zimbabwe and Namibia.

Nadia, I think there is still a glimmer of hope for the civilians caught up in this terrible civil war. The coming weeks will be very crucial for all sides if any permanent peace settlement is to be implemented.

DRC Government, Rebels Approve Election Proposal](VOA - Voice of America English News) VOA news

Representatives of the government of the Democratic Republic of Congo and the major rebel groups have approved proposals for a two-year transitional period leading to democratic elections in the war-torn country. The agreement was reached in Pretoria at peace talks aimed at ending four years of civil war in Congo. The delegates agreed to a draft interim constitution and a memorandum on military and security issues.

The documents must be formally adopted by the government of the Democratic Republic of Congo and the leaders of the major rebel groups, in order to establish a multi-party government that will oversee a two-year transition leading to democratic elections. It is expected that the documents will be formally signed at a meeting to be convened within 15 days by Sir Ketumile Masire, former Botswana president and chairman of the Inter-Congolese dialogue.

The draft constitution provides for a government, led by the current president of Congo, Joseph Kabila, and four prime-ministers, including two from the major rebel groups, the Congolese Rally for Democracy and the Congolese Liberation Movement. The government also agreed that security in Kinshasa and other major towns will be provided by an international peacekeeping force under the auspices of the United Nations. The military chiefs from the warring parties will meet to plan the restructuring of the various forces into a new national army.

But some observers say many outstanding issues remain. These include procuring funding for the international peacekeeping force and the structuring of the new national army. Observers also say that continued breaches of the existing cease-fire will also threaten any transitional arrangement. This week, there was renewed fighting in the northeastern town of Bunia between Ugandan forces and a small rebel group.

Some two million people have died since the conflict began, either as a result of the fighting, or from war-related starvation and disease. At its height, the forces of six central and southern African countries were involved in the conflict. The agreement has been welcomed by the United Nations and the South African government.

Great, very informative article DhP :k: Thank you for putting it up in this thread.

i am trying to compile a list of sources regarding DRC, BBC doesn’t seem to have much on it. Best one thus far seems to be Yahoo.

Oneworld.net

Country profile: Democratic Republic of Congo, BBC, 5 March 2003 [includes several audio links]

ReliefWeb [very exhaustive, updated list]

Washington Post [has a useful, albeit not very updated, section regarding issues affecting the DRC]

Yahoo Congo News [this is probably the best site i found thus far, very factual, lots of links to other news sites]

DR Congo peace deal signed, BBC, 2 April 2003

Representatives of the government and rebels in the Democratic Republic of Congo have signed a deal intended to end almost five years of war. However President Joseph Kabila and MLC rebel leader Jean-Pierre Bemba did not personally sign the two page document.

The deal includes a new constitution and a power-sharing administration which is supposed to oversee DR Congo’s first democratic elections since 1960 in two years’ time. But there are still questions over integrating the different factions into a new army, while rebel leaders are unsure about their security in the capital, Kinshasa.

The signing was witnessed by the leaders of South Africa, Botswana, Namibia, Zambia and Zimbabwe. South African President Thabo Mbeki welcomed the deal but also sounded a word of caution.

“You know better than I do that the implementation of historic agreements you have entered into will not be easy,” he said. “You problems will originate both from within the (DR) Congo and from elsewhere, outside your borders. To overcome them will require a single-minded commitment to serve.”

“Brothers and sisters, let us stop destroying our country - the Democratic Republic of Congo,” said Cardinal Frederic Esthou, who blessed the signing ceremony and the interim government. The signing endorsed an agreement last December and a new constitution reached last month.

Under the deal, President Kabila keeps his post, while rebels and the civilian opposition get vice-presidential posts in a two-year transitional authority.

More than two million people are believed to have died as a result of the war which began in 1998, and at one stage dragged in half a dozen foreign armies.

DR Congo, Rwanda and Uganda also signed a deal to end the war last year but recently Rwanda has threatened to send its troops back onto Congolese territory unless Uganda also withdraws. Uganda has been involved in recent fighting around the north-eastern town of Bunia, which remains tense.

The BBC’s Mark Dummett in Bunia says that despite recent peace moves, worries remain because too many people still have guns and ethnic hatreds are not going away.

Nadia, unfortunately this deal is just going to be a ceasefire for a while. Let's hope, for the benefit of the people living in the DRC, that it will last some time. Politics in Africa is extremely unstable. Unfortunately Mbeki doesn't want Nepad to have more of a clout - i.e. to sanction members due to internal bad governance. Until Africa's leaders realize they are accountable to the people they rule and not there to enrich themselves, Nepad and any other "deal" is not worth the paper it's written on.

Old man, I was curious, are there any ligts at the end of the tunnel? I mean is there no political awakening amongst the people? Are there any leaders at all on the radar that are truly nationalists i.e. they give a damn about the people?

There's so much concern about liberating the poor Iraqi people, it would be nice if we could liberate the poor civilians in the Congo as well from these evil regimes.

**
Quite true :k:

Caution over DR Congo deal, BBC, 3 April 2003

Reaction has been muted to the signing of a deal in South Africa to end almost five years of war in the Democratic Republic of Congo. The agreement includes a new constitution and a power-sharing administration which is supposed to oversee DR Congo’s first democratic elections since 1960 in two years’ time.

However, President Joseph Kabila and MLC rebel leader Jean-Pierre Bemba did not personally sign the two page document. Welcoming the deal, South Africa’s President Mbeki warned of problems ahead from both within and outside the country’s borders.

UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan said that the most difficult times lay ahead, saying: “No one must imagine that this deal will implement itself.” Ethnic conflict among militias in the north-eastern Ituri region, which has born the brunt of the violence in recent months, is still a major stumbling block to peace.

Speaking from the regional capital, Bunia, the BBC’s Mark Dummett says that worries remain because too many people still have guns and ethnic hatreds are not going away. He told the BBC’s Network Africa programme of the scene of utter devastation he witnessed on a 40km stretch of road out of Bunia, with fresh graves at the roadside and all the villages he passed through being burnt out.

Villagers in Kobo showed him what they said were several mass graves from the end of February that contained between 35 and 75 bodies in them.

As well as continuing ethnic conflict in the area, there is also growing tension between neighbouring Uganda and Rwanda over the refusal of Ugandan troops to pull out of Bunia. DR Congo, Rwanda and Uganda all signed a deal to end the war last year but recently Rwanda threatened to send its troops back onto Congolese territory unless Uganda also withdraws.

The signing of the deal in the Sun City resort was witnessed by several regional leaders but questions still remain over the integrating of the different factions into a new army. Rebel leaders are also unsure about their security in the capital, Kinshasa.

The signing endorsed an agreement last December and a new constitution reached last month. Under the deal, President Kabila keeps his post, while rebels and the civilian opposition get vice-presidential posts in a two-year transitional authority.

More than two million people are believed to have died as a result of the war which began in 1998, and at one stage dragged in half a dozen foreign armies.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Judge^MentuLL: *
There's so much concern about liberating the poor Iraqi people, it would be nice if we could liberate the poor civilians in the Congo as well from these evil regimes.
[/QUOTE]

I'll support sending German, French and Russian troops to the Congo to liberate those folks. When they're done, I'll support sending US companies there for the reconstruction.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by myvoice: *
I'll support sending German, French and Russian troops to the Congo to liberate those folks. When they're done, I'll support sending US companies there for the reconstruction.
[/QUOTE]

Wow!

Who do you wish to liberate them from?

mufakkar: I suppose there is always some light at the end of any tunnel. It's just the distance to travel that differs in each case. Good leaders are there. Often they don't get into power because they don't have the backing of the military, are not well connected with large companies wih money (like myvoice's USA companies), are not from some elite group inside the country, are from a minority ethnic/religious group in a country, etc. Let's be honest, normally almost all politicians are in it for their own pocket. I believe the major problem in Africa is that the people, who by-and-large is illiterate, were for centuries ruled by kings/despots/dictators and they accept it as the norm. Let me explain:

During apartheid the South African government set up bantustans where the different tribes could rule themselves in a sort of federal way (much like the USA and it's states). These bantustans were situated on land mainly owned by tribal councils or frequented by only one of the tribes. One used to be "Bapothatswana" and was ruled by a democratic elected leader Lucas Mangope who also was the head of the richest/largest group of the Tswana tribe namely the Bafokeng. With Sun City and the platinum mines falling in his domain, he had enough finances and set to improving the lot of the people by building hospitals, schools, sports grounds, etc. I used to work in this area and, although he was very strict, most Tswanas thought highly of him because of all the improvements. When I questioned one person one day about the strictness, he stated that Mangope was "clever" because he was strong. (?) Then one day an ANC supported man tried to take over the government and South Africa had to step in and save Mangope. Almost all Tswanas I spoke to after that day were against Mangope because he showed weakness. You see, in Africa the strong rule the weak. That's why Mugabe (Zimbabwe), Njoma (Namibia), etc, is in power - they belong to the strongest tribe in those particular countries.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by myvoice: *

I'll support sending German, French and Russian troops to the Congo to liberate those folks. When they're done, I'll support sending US companies there for the reconstruction.
[/QUOTE]

I like that myvoice. It's the blatant honest truth. Not reflected in your news media though, but then I guess the average joe public in America needs to be fed La La Land bull$hit. But if it works, hell yeah, why not? :)

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Judge^MentuLL: *
I like that myvoice. It's the blatant honest truth. Not reflected in your news media though, but then I guess the average joe public in America needs to be fed La La Land bull$hit. But if it works, hell yeah, why not? :)
[/QUOTE]

All we need to do is to get a few nuts to lie down on a major freeway in a big city with posters opposing US military involvement in the Congo and you'll get lots of press coverage. As long as its only French, German and Russian troops who will die you'll probably pull enough support for an American financial contribution although we might just root for the liberation of the Congo to be long and hard. Is there oil there? Any other resources that we could exploit after the war?

Congo massacre ‘leaves 1,000 dead’, Mark Dummett, BBC, 6 April 2003

Survivors of a massacre in north-eastern Democratic Republic of Congo have told UN human rights investigators that nearly 1,000 civilians were killed last Thursday on the eve of talks to bring peace to the war-ravaged Ituri district.

The investigators from the UN peace-keeping mission in Congo (or Monuc) flew into Drodro - near the border with Uganda - on Saturday where they interviewed eyewitnesses and visited mass graves. The Monuc spokesman in Kinshasa, Hamadoun Toure, said survivors in Drodro town had compiled a list of 966 victims of a killing spree that lasted three hours, early on Thursday morning.

The investigators who went to Drodro - some 80 kilometres (50 miles) from the district capital, Bunia - said they spoke to community leaders, priests and 15 eyewitnesses. They visited the sites of 20 mass graves, where they reported seeing the traces of blood and the clothing of victims. Forty-nine survivors of the attack in Drodro hospital bore machete and bullet wounds.

The killings occurred just before the launch on Friday of the negotiations most people hope will bring an end to the cycle of appalling inter-ethnic and factional violence that has devastated north-eastern Congo during the past four years.

Local groups say the clashes that started out as a simple land dispute between pastoralists and farmers have killed more than 50,000 people and displaced a further 500,000.

Whilst the worlds attention is on Bush's illegal invasion of Iraq it seems the deadly civil war has re-erupted in the Congo. Very sad.

[QUOTE]
Originally posted by Dil he Pakistani: *
Whilst the worlds attention is on Bush's **illegal
* invasion of Iraq it seems the deadly civil war has re-erupted in the Congo. Very sad.
[/QUOTE]
Yes, when will your protest against the Congo massacre?

Please quit it, Imdad. Kuch faiday ka contribute kar na hai to this issue, then please do so. i really do not want an argument or anything Iraq-related in this thread.

Postwar consolidation will require the participation of external partners. The tough and complex work of building democracy now lies ahead, writes Chris Landsberg

Congo Peace Deal is Only the Beginning](http://allafrica.com/stories/200304060013.html) All Africa News

Sunday Times (Johannesburg) April 6, 2003

While the US and its friends continued to teach the world a lesson in invasion by sidelining and ignoring the United Nations in particular and multilateralism and international co-operation in general, the Democratic Republic of Congo peace process and deal-making was an example of an attempt to work multilaterally - under arduous political circumstances - to end war, not promote shock and awe. (Excerpt)

Similarly, in the case of Congo, you first need to end the war in that country and get belligerents and enemies to jointly determine the political rules of the game, so that the ending of conflict introduces democracy and democratic governance. In the case of Congo, the centre of gravity is a highly fragile one. Even at the level of the new governing elites, the peace will have to be constantly cemented. Even if that could be achieved - and the odds are stacked against it - armies will have to be demobilised and integrated, and external parties will have to agree to become peace promoters as opposed to peace spoilers. (Excerpt) Full Article](http://allafrica.com/stories/200304060013.html)

Dr Chris Landsberg is director of the Centre for Policy Studies

Very well-written article, DhP. i love the allafrica.com source more - hehe, i'm going to add it now to my other news sources :D Thank you so much for posting that article. Really appreciate it.

I didn't even mention Iraq. But great work by the UN in preventing the massacre in Congo..not!

nadia, your welcome :slight_smile:

Contrary to imdads views, I think its very important that the UN continues to implement a permanent peace plan for Congo. The horrific massacres that have occurred have only highlighted the urgency for peace which is sponsored by all sides of the conflict. The recent ratification of the Constitution is also a positive development for Congo.

DRC President Ratifies Constitution](VOA - Voice of America English News) VOA News 05 Apr 03

Democratic Republic of Congo President Joseph Kabila has ratified a new constitution, endorsing a power-sharing agreement with rebels to end nearly five years of war. The president signed the constitution late Friday in the capital, Kinshasa. The document is part of a peace deal signed Wednesday by political and rebel leaders. President Kabila did not attend that signing ceremony in Sun City, South Africa, but sent a representative instead. His absence led some analysts to question whether he would endorse the peace deal.

The new constitution provides for a transitional government to rule the country for up to two and-a-half years. After that, the Democratic Republic of Congo will hold its first democratic elections since it gained independence from Belgium in 1960. Under the peace agreement, President Kabila will lead the transitional government with four vice presidents, representing the present government, the political opposition and the two main rebel groups. There is still no agreement on how a new national army will be formed or who will lead it.

The war in the Democratic Republic of Congo began in 1998, when neighboring Rwanda and Uganda backed an uprising aimed at overthrowing the Kinshasa government. Zimbabwe, Angola and Namibia sent troops to support the government. Most foreign troops have now withdrawn, but fighting continues in parts of eastern Congo. An estimated 2.5 million people have died in the Congolese conflict.