Comparison of two missile attack incidents!

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by antiobl: *

Yeap! Initial MAToo stance is still there. The MAToos terrorists have completly lost it. They want to attack army in the name of religion, nationalism, and you name it. These Baha-Rat-i chamcha-Gir, Arrrab terrorist supporters are simply following the "Kartoot" of the halwa-Khor Mullah Moe.

MAToo posts have to be read carefully. They are filled with leftie-commie Arrra-booboo terrorist propaganda.
[/QUOTE]

Thanks antiOBL, couldnt have said it any better...

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by camouflage: *
Since, before Pakistan had sided with US, there weren't any problems within Pakistans borders. It is only when Pakistan assisted the US in destroying Afghanistan that we see people are becoming anti Pakistan and are trying to hurt the Pakistani govt.

So IMO that Pakistan initiated this new war with its own people and I find it difficult to support Pak Army, since they have yet to justify their stance of supporting the US in the first place.
[/QUOTE]

Just because you disagree with the foreign policy of your country does not justify raising the ugly flag of treason and rebellion. It would be a different matter altogether if the government was actively repressing a people, because that may be a legitimate cause to resist.

If you disagree with government policy, you should instead lobby the country's leadership and try and work change through peaceful channels. The MMA is incredibly vehemently opposed to the government's recent foreign policy, but you don't see them going round in open rebellion!!!!

Q

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by mAd_ScIeNtIsT: *

Just because you disagree with the foreign policy of your country does not justify raising the ugly flag of treason and rebellion. It would be a different matter altogether if the government was actively repressing a people, because that may be a legitimate cause to resist.

If you disagree with government policy, you should instead lobby the country's leadership and try and work change through peaceful channels. The MMA is incredibly vehemently opposed to the government's recent foreign policy, but you don't see them going round in open rebellion!!!!
[/QUOTE]

Lobby the country's leadership? How's that possible in a country like ours? Where the will of the army is what prevails. In a country where it is a firm belief that army can do no wrong.

It may be easy to confuse the masses, who are addicted to mainstream media, by bringing up this argument of lobbying and using peaceful channels, its not going to work unless the army is grilled too. This image, that the army is patriotic and civillians are not, should be taken care of, before we can have matters resolved through proper channels.