commitment :> 'oh, what's that supposed to mean?

Re: commitment :> 'oh, what's that supposed to mean?

no people, we must try and make sense with good intention,

as to why someone leaves after coming close and assuring to stay with the other person,

either he is unsure of himself, and VERY confused
or has pressures from elsewhere
or was lonely and depressed and wants to stay that way (which is unacceptable) --> any man who is afraid toreak away from a sense of personal insecurity or false sense of being considered weak, just because he shared his sense of wanting to bond, is a self destruction, unless that man is really horribly ill-witted and dishonest and was doing this all on purpose
or does not realize purity from entrapment
or has been so wrapped in fear, that he is unable to take any good risk, even though he himself is not evil
or he is very low in his self esteem, but want a cacoon of male insensitivity to defend his vulnerability,
or he wanted to feel out the person,
or he finds himself not better enough for 'someone' (HERE HE IS EXTREMELY WRONG) [and he must know that if two people took their time to know each other, honestly enough, that the one who left, must realize that before it is too late - another effort must be made ],
or what is really mean, is this: even though initially he came across as too nice, where as all along he was ill-intentioned?

so, what do you think?