CJ confrontational on 18th Amendment?

[shami2k]

@tipusulatn

Sir the only CJ was sent home was Sajjad Ali Shah, but that time supreme court was divided, and so called establishment was in NS favor.

But today courts is united, establishment is natural, and Zaradari has no moral position.

If CJ strike down two controversial amendment, no one would cry accept NS and Zardari as they could not black mail members of parliament.

With due respect it was always my position (just look at my previous posts) that immunity drives from his character. And article 62 is very clear anyone aspirant of public office should be person of good character.

Just on Wednesday the courts has rejected application of two former MPs for using fake degree previously.

If you take out NRO, then Mr. Zardari was not eligible to take part of presidential election on that day under article 62. (he was convicted by swiss court as appealing).

1st, funny that you would bring up article 62. Do you know who inserted article 62 in the Constitution? Yea, Zia-ul-Haq. It was not originally part of the constitution.

2nd, what is good character & how do you quantify that?

3rd, regardless of how he was elected, his election now cannot be called into question.

BTW, degree requirement isn’t there anymore. It was thrown out by your beloved the CJ.