CJ confrontational on 18th Amendment?

[tipusulatn]

@shami2k

If the courts interfere in working of the Parliament & violate the laws the judges will be booted out b/c right now all parties are on the same side. What do you think the court is going to do? Send CJ to implement his own courts verdict that clearly violates the very Constitution that his court should be protecting?

Btw, its funny that you’re argument now has come down to whether or not Zardari is man of good character. He is politician & I don’t expect him to have good character b/c there are no saints in politics. I would, however, measure him with same yardstick as I would measure any other politicians, including NS. Also, he was elected so he has law and legitimacy on his side. This is how things work in democracy & whatever you or I say is irrelevant.

Sir the only CJ was sent home was Sajjad Ali Shah, but that time supreme court was divided, and so called establishment was in NS favor.

But today courts is united, establishment is natural, and Zaradari has no moral position.

If CJ strike down two controversial amendment, no one would cry accept NS and Zardari as they could not black mail members of parliament.

With due respect it was always my position (just look at my previous posts) that immunity drives from his character. And article 62 is very clear anyone aspirant of public office should be person of good character.

Just on Wednesday the courts has rejected application of two former MPs for using fake degree previously.

If you take out NRO, then Mr. Zardari was not eligible to take part of presidential election on that day under article 62. (he was convicted by swiss court as appealing).