CJ confrontational on 18th Amendment?

[CM]

@Decent_6Chora

If you want to pick n choose and discuss some deeds of Iffti and ignore other not-so-legal deeds, u r very welcome to live in fool’s paradise.

Just to provide you with some basic information on how it work.

Supreme Court can only interpret the Constitution, or decide how the framers intended for the Articles and Amendments to be applied. It can not TAKEUP/STRUCK-DOWN UNLESS its against the basic human rights and If CJ is thinking to take up 18th amendment down (as this article suggests), he is just showing his true colors. There is nothing in 18th amendment that violates basic human rights.

PS: I see where you are coming from. Its easy to taunt others but hard to come up with valid argument

The article discussed is about the constitional amendment. You want to discuss something else by all means open a new thread.

And no you are wrong. The Supreme Court does not only interpret the Constitution. It also has the additional task of ensuring that all amendments to the constitution are in the spirit of the original constitution.

Lastly would you please prove:

It can not TAKEUP/STRUCK-DOWN UNLESS its against the basic human rights

Since you made the claim. Prove it.