China also did not prevent Pakistan from being conquered and further dismembered by India like the US did in 1971 (speaking of 71', where was the "ummah"'? Did Saudi Arabia cut off oil to India?). That decision sure did backfire on the US didn't it?! The US also gave Pakistan cover to back down from war in 1999. Without it there would have been a war and Pakistan would have lost. Again, it backfired on the US. My guess is the next time Pakistan is threatened with conquest by India the US will remain on the sidelines...As they say in the US, fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me...
"Dictating"? What polices are being "dictated"? For years the US has asked Pakistan to crush the terrorists in Wazirstan and Pakistan has not done it. Pakistan signed several "peace deals" with them--over US objections. Since Pakistan will not do it the US would like to do it but Pakistan will not allow the US to launch regular air strikes on terrorist bases or send ground troops to crush them. This is "control"?
I never cease to be amazed and amused at how Pakistanis (and Arabs) blame the US for 300+ years of decay and decline (you know, before the US even existed).
That is par for the course. If you are giving, say, $100 million to build a road you would prefer that road be built by a company in your country rather than a UK or Japanese firm.
I am not interested in anwsering someone who is not able to see things without putting Indian specs and rhetoric. :) its a waist of my precious time :)