Chinese Naval fleet to be stationed in Pakistan waters

Chinese Naval fleet to be stationed in Pakistan waters
ISHTIAQ ALI MEHKRI
KARACHI, May 21, 10:18

With the tacit decision to station a Chinese Naval fleet in the waters of Baluchistan, near Gawadar Port, Beijing had won what Russian aggression and United States manoeuvering had failed to do over the last many decades.

Gawadar deep-sea port enjoys a unique strategic significance. It is situated at the western end of Baluchistan, and is formed by a natural headland connected to the mainland by a sandspit. At the strategic hub of Strait of Hormuz and on the mouth of Persian Gulf, it is Pakistan’s second Naval outlet after the Karachi Port.
The covert understanding was reached during the visit of Chinese Prime Minister Zhu Rongji to Pakistan. It had opened a new vista in the Pak-China relationship.
It all went galvanizing in the spectrum of the United States President’s announcement of National Missile Defence (NMD) strategy and Washington’s cold shoulder to Islamabad.
Both Pakistan and China seized the opportunity and in principle it was decided to set the ball rolling in the region by not only countering the US hegmonistic designs in Asia but also check the emerging Indo-US nexus. The visit of Premier Zhu Rongji to Pakistan brought to fore a number of understandings in the defence and economic horizons.
Sources in the Ministry of Defence said Pakistan had blessed the Chinese with the honour of building the Gawadar deep sea port as well as upgrading its naval installations in Omara Naval Base in order to keep a vigilant eye on the Arabian Sea as well as the Gulf.
“The decision is a landmark,” says a Foreign Office official manning Chinese affairs, “as it a tactical deterrent to the mighty Indian Naval establishment in the Arabian Sea and the Indian Ocean.”
A source at the Karachi Naval Dockyard said the “Chinese arm” will make the difference felt for the Indians “busy in intimidating Pakistan under one pretext or the other.”
Zhu Rongji’s visit to Pakistan had a tantalizing piquancy. It was a right signal at a complexed moment of diplomacy. As the US Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage was busy convincing New Delhi of the virtues of George W. Bush’s NMD and Star Wars doctrine, Zhu has been writing history in Pakistan.
Zhu’s list of gestures were marvellous: A firm diplomatic and military support against aggression over Islamabad, “yes” to upgradation of Pakistan’s missile and nuclear programme as well as a generous contribution to its economic upliftment.
Foreign Office officials lament over the aspect that the US “ignored” Pakistan while its envoy was on a diplomatic spree to explain his government’s newly-announced NMD doctrine. “It speaks of Washington’s arrogant attitude and a partisan approach towards a Muslim nuclear power,” says a research fellow at the Institute of Policy Studies, Islamabad.
But a source in the Army’s General Headquarters (GHQ) was quick to add: “China card is more than enough to perplex the American and Indian designs against Pakistan.” And the US did this despite the fact that the International Institute of Strategic Studies, London, in its recent report said: “Although India’s nuclear infrastructure and financial means are far greater, Pakistan’s military programme, especially the nuclear and missile ones, have first call on available resources.”
With Zhu’s visit Chinese are back in business in Pakistan. They have been assigned the task to build Gawadar deep sea port and the 653 km long Makran coastal highway from Karachi to Gawadar - a project that would cost around $1.6 billion. Other than building the port, the Chinese have also been entrusted with the responsibility to unearth Pakistan’s largest mineral deposits in Saindak. And that was not the end of Zhu’s visit: He had promised Pakistan with a soft loan of one billion dollars to help finance its dwindling sectors of railways and communications.
An official at the Ministry of Finance noted that the Chinese generosity is a “slap” on the face of IMF and World Bank who hoodwink as much as they could before funneling Pakistan with their piecemeal assistance. But then there is no dearth of “conspiracy” theorists in Pakistan’s establishment, too. They say that Zhu’s visit turned out to be the “most ill-timed” for Pakistan’s foreign policy front.
They point out that with NMD out of bag, it was time for Pakistan to bargain with Washington as the Indians tactfully did. Other than a spontaneous Foreign Minister Jaswant Singh’s policy statement to support Bush’s NMD, sooner than later it was announced, the Indians set out to bargain the best in their national interest. And that included “undoing of US imposed sanctions, joining of nuclear club, permanent seat at the UN Security Council, and a ‘preferred’ state status in trade and development.”
Though New Delhi went “out of way” with US on a ride, yet it was very much in the Russian lap, analysts point out in Pakistan. And that is what Pakistan needed to do by “flirting” along with the US while maintaining a firm Chinese posture.
Sources in the policy-making circles regret that Islamabad and its diplomatic corps in Washington failed to study the mood of the Bush administration while they moved towards the Indians. But Foreign Office rebuffs the allegation and says that the “Chinese stepping in at the right moment saved Islamabad from being declared a rogue state by the US.”
Hardly had Zhu’s visit to Pakistan concluded, the US State Department came out with a categorical assurance that Pakistan is not among the list of Bush’s “rogue states.”
And this had an element of joy for the military regime of General Pervez Musharraf. Sources in the government say that the US decision “must have perplexed Prime Minister Vajpayee and his administration that jumped into the bandwagon of Bush’s NMD anticipating isolation of Pakistan militarily and diplomatically.”
Other than diplomatic, economic and military lifeline, the Chinese premier also brought with him what the regime of General Musharraf desired the most: political support. Zhu went out of way to pronounce that Musharraf’s “coup had brought Pakistan out of mess.”
Many in the Army term it as a feather in Musharraf’s cap and proudly point out that with Myanmar, Vietnam and China behind Islamabad, US-India axis has been put to test.
(The writer is a journalist with The Dawn, Karachi)
http://www.thenewspapertoday.com/world/inside.phtml?NEWS_ID=14439

[This message has been edited by byousaf (edited May 22, 2001).]

A very good strategical move, and with China's emerging importance in world affairs, a useful leverage for Pakistan.

I wonder if India would not be better off in pursuing closer ties with Pakistan instead of watching in dismay as Pakistan strengthens links with China as a counter to aggressive Indian miltary designs ?

This seems like a good strategic move in the short term.. But remember tht Chou En Lai and Nehru became friends in the 50's and later China took of piece of India and Kashmir.

This is a globlal game between China and USA. India and Pakistan are both Pawns.

The future of both India and Pakistan depends on good relations between them. After all we are both desi's with a big cultual and historical relationship.

Chinese naval presence in Pakistan at the very entrance to the
Persian Gulf cannot be ignored by usa iran
and gulf countries

Why are Indians so concerned about what the Americans might think about Great China moving it’s Navy to Pakistani waters? The Americans were made to be very, very sorry for the last time they took on China, and their precious spy plane is now being sent back in bits back to the US of A. I don’t think the Americans can do anything about Pakistan freely inviting the Chinese Navy to it’s waters.

This move is good for the developement of Balochistan and Pakistan as a whole. An increasing and expanding PAK-China relationship in all area’s - military, economic and infrastructure will make Pakistan a true West Asian power. A force to be reckoned with.

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/smile.gif

Malik,

Dont get so sentimental about 'Great' china. They are just using Pakistan as a base in South Asia. Just two years back Pakistan was ready to bend over backward to USA. Now look they have become sour grapes for Pakistanis.

China has no option but to become a major player in South & Central Asia due to the rising tide of Uighur unrest in Xinjiang province and the flow of weapons, drugs and Islamic activism from Taliban controlled Afghanistan. Pakistan may be forced to change its policy towards Taleban. Chinese do not do anything unless it serves their purpose.

There are no permanent friends or enemies but only permanent national interest. I see the burning topic now in south asian region is Islamic militancy and almost all countries are affected.

[quote]
There are no permanent friends or enemies...
[/quote]

I would call 50 years of Pak-China friendship quite permanent I think. This relationship has endured and strenghthend over time, despite the different idealogical focus of both countries. In fact that has been a model for others to follow. When you talk about self-interests you are looking at it from an entirely western/American angle. The Chinese are a nation skilled not just in the art diplomacy and statecraft, but instilled in them are strong Asian values like loyalty and good neighbourliness.

Malik ,

I am not commenting on stationing their ship in Pakistan waters. Paksitan has absolute freedom to do permit whomever it wants. Foreign investment at this juncture is very much essential for Pakistan.

I am talking about you referring Chinese as 'Great' and 'Loyal'. At one point of time US was great and loyal friend of Pakistan and once their purpose is served they threw Pakistan out like rotten egg. (Tomorrow they may come back and woo you again. That is also possible). As long as Pakistan keeps supporting Taleban never count China as your trusted friend.

I am talking about you referring Chinese as ‘Great’ and ‘Loyal’.

Greatness my friend is referring to China’s vast economic and military power that will continue to grow for decades to come, ensuring that China becomes the primary superpower of the world. As for your loyalty theory I refer you back to my previous reply i.e. stop looking at things from an American perspective and look at it from an ASIAN perspective. As for the Taliban holding back PAK-China relations. I suggest you read the original article again and then tell us if the Taliban is mentioned at all, or if it has held back the VAST new Pak-China projects in so many fields?

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/smile.gif

mallik do you really think china has more
influense on pakistan than united states?

If America had so much influnece on Pakistan rvikz do you think they would not use it to stop this GROWING Pak-China military relationship? In fact has it been able to stop Pak-China military co-operation in the past? NO.

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/smile.gif