Change of leadership in TTP?

Interesting, seems as if the military establishment is happy on these turn of events…

A new Pakistani Taliban chief emerging? | DAWN.COM

**WANA: The Pakistani Taliban, one of the world’s most feared militant groups, are preparing for a leadership change that could mean less violence against the state but more attacks against US-led forces in Afghanistan, Pakistani military sources said.
**
Hakimullah Mehsud, a ruthless commander who has led the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) for the last three years, has lost operational control of the movement and the trust of his fighters, said a senior Pakistan army official based in the South Waziristan tribal region, the group’s stronghold.

**The organisation’s more moderate deputy leader, Wali-ur-Rehman, 40, is poised to succeed Mehsud, whose extreme violence has alienated enough of his fighters to significantly weaken him, the military sources told Reuters.
**
**“Rehman is fast emerging as a consensus candidate to formally replace Hakimullah,” said the army official, who declined to be identified because of the sensitivity of the matter. “Now we may see the brutal commander replaced by a more pragmatic one for whom reconciliation with the Pakistani government has become a priority.”
**
The TTP, known as the Pakistani Taliban, was set up as an umbrella group of militants in 2007.

Its main aim is to topple the US-backed government in Pakistan and impose its austere brand of Islam across the country of 185 million people, although it has also carried out attacks in neighbouring Afghanistan.

**The militants intensified their battle against the Pakistani state after an army raid on Islamabad’s Red Mosque in 2007, which had been seized by allies of the group.
**
Mehsud, believed to be in his mid-30s, took over the Pakistani Taliban in August 2009. He rose to prominence in 2010 when US prosecutors charged him with involvement in an attack that killed seven CIA employees at a US base in Afghanistan.

His profile was raised further when he appeared in a farewell video with the Jordanian suicide bomber who killed the employees.

Reuters interviewed several senior Pakistan military officials as well as tribal elders and locals during a three-day trip with the army in South Waziristan last week, getting rare access to an area that has been a virtual no-go zone for journalists since an army offensive was launched in October 2009.

Three senior military officials said informers in the Pakistani Taliban told them Mehsud was no longer steering the group.

Pakistani Taliban commanders did not respond to repeated requests for comment on the possible leadership change.

US officials said that while Rehman was Mehsud’s natural successor, they cautioned about expecting an imminent transition. Mehsud’s standing in the Pakistani Taliban might have weakened, but he still had followers, they said.

Washington has offered a reward of $5 million for information leading to the capture of either Mehsud or Rehman.

One Pakistan military official, who has served in South Waziristan for more than two years, said his Pakistani Taliban contacts first alerted him to Mehsud’s waning power six months ago, when constant pressure from the Pakistan military, US drone strikes and poor health had hurt his ability to lead.

**“Representing the moderate point of view, there is a probability that under Rehman, TTP will dial down its fight against the Pakistani state, unlike Hakimullah who believes in wanton destruction here,” said the military official based in the South Waziristani capital of Wana.
**
The official said this might lead to more attacks across the border in Afghanistan because Rehman has been pushing for the group’s fighters to turn their guns on Western forces.

Other factions within the Pakistani Taliban such as the Nazir group in South Waziristan and the Hafiz Gul Bahadur faction in North Waziristan have struck peace deals with the Pakistani military while focusing attacks on Western and Afghan forces in Afghanistan.

A change in the Pakistan Taliban’s focus would complicate Western efforts to stabilise Afghanistan before most Nato troops leave by the end of 2014, said Riaz Mohammad Khan, a Pakistani diplomat who has held several posts dealing with Afghanistan.

The United States is already fighting the Afghan Taliban and the Haqqani network, which is based along the unruly frontier between Afghanistan and Pakistan and which is perhaps Washington’s deadliest foe in Afghanistan.

The last thing US-led Nato troops need is a new, formidable enemy in the approach to 2014.

Such a shift in emphasis, however, could reduce the number of suicide bombings that have plagued Pakistan in recent years, scaring off investment needed to prop up an economy that has barely managed to grow since 2007.

**At each other’s throats
**
The Pakistani Taliban, who are close to al Qaeda, remain resilient despite a series of military offensives. They took part in a number of high-profile operations, including an attack on army headquarters in 2009, assaults on military bases, and the attempted assassination of Pakistani schoolgirl Malala Yousufzai in October, who had campaigned for girls’ education.

The Pakistani Taliban were also blamed for the 2008 bombing of the Marriott Hotel in Islamabad which killed more than 50 people.

Under Mehsud, the organisation formed complex alliances with other militant groups spread across Pakistan.

But it has long been strained by internal rivalries over strategy. Mehsud has pushed the war with the Pakistani state, while others such as Rehman want the battle to be against US and allied forces in Afghanistan.

“Rehman has even held secret negotiations with the Pakistani government in the past but Hakimullah always stood in his way, wanting to carry on fighting the Pakistani military,” a second Wana-based military official said.

The two were at each other’s throats earlier this year and hostilities were close to open warfare, Taliban sources said.

“Differences within the ranks have only gotten worse, not better, rendering the TTP a much weaker force today than a few years ago,” the second military official said.

**A source close to the Taliban told Reuters there had been months of internal talks on the Pakistani Taliban’s decreasing support among locals and fighters in tribal areas where the group has assassinated many pro-government elders.
**
**“The Taliban know they are fighting a public relations war, and under someone like Hakimullah, they will only lose it,” added the source who declined to be identified because he was not authorized to speak to the media.
**
It isn’t clear whether Mehsud will hand over the leadership to Rehman without a fight.

A power struggle could split the group, making it more difficult to recruit young fighters and also disrupt the safe havens in Pakistan used by Afghan militants.

According to accepted practice, a leadership council, or shura, will ultimately decide whether to formally replace Mehsud with Rehman.

Intelligence officials said Mehsud had not commanded any recent operations, including an Aug 16 attack on the Minhas Airbase in Pakistan and a suicide attack on a street market in May that killed 24 people.

Military sources said Rehman planned the April 15 jail break in Bannu in Pakistan that freed 384 prisoners, including an estimated 200 Taliban members and an al Qaeda-linked militant who had attempted to assassinate former president Pervez Musharraf.

**Fall from grace
**
Intelligence officials in the area said Mehsud’s brutality had turned his own subordinates against him, while the more measured Rehman had emerged as the group’s primary military strategist.

“If a leader doesn’t behave like a leader, he loses support. For the longest time now, Hakimullah has done the dirty work while Wali-ur-Rehman is the thinker. Taliban fighters recognise this,” said the first Pakistani military source.

A local elder described Mehsud as “short-tempered and trigger-happy”.

“(Mehsud) used to work 24 hours a day, tirelessly. But he would also put a gun to anyone’s head and kill them for his cause,” said a local shopkeeper who has family members involved in the Pakistan Taliban.

Mehsud gained his reputation fighting with the Afghan Taliban against US and allied forces in Helmand province in Afghanistan. He was later given command of Taliban factions in the Bajaur, Orakzai, Khyber and Kurram regions.

He took over the Pakistani Taliban after a weeks-long succession battle with Rehman following the death of Baitullah Mehsud in a drone strike. The two Mehsuds were not related.

Re: Change of leadership in TTP?

Let us not take refuge in the philosophy of good Taliban and bad Taliban. As a state, Pakistan must not become a client or a patron of a militia. They have their own agenda and we cannot become a party to it. Even if they are not staging attacks in Pakistan and instead conducting cross-border raids into Afghanistan, it will still remain a serious credibility and sovereignty issue for the country.

Re: Change of leadership in TTP?

It is delusional thinking that the change in TTP leadership will change any ground realities. Taliban has its own agenda of rule by violence and deprive people of their basic rights. From day one they have been the enemy of peace. They have been tried and tested as recently as a few years ago in the Swat valley, and that area is still recovering from the Taliban menace. This common enemy has to be dealt with an iron fist- new leadership or not. Those who think that violence against Pakistanis will cease may be totally wrong. The group that is responsible for the death of over 40,000 innocent Pakistanis along with over 5,000 military personnel will change its stance overnight? Where does the argument stand that the TTP was created by the USA, when they say they will now attack NATO troops across the border from Pakistan? Rest assured, Taliban are our common enemy and they have been cornered. This new leadership drama is just a strategy to buy time and regroup. This is the time we all need to stand united and hit them from all sides for the sake of the innocent people of the region, who have been suffering at the hands of these ruthless killers for a very long time.

LTC T.G. Taylor
DET-United States Central Command
(http://www.centcom.mil/ur)

Re: Change of leadership in TTP?

Here's hoping the kill each other off...

Re: Change of leadership in TTP?

hmmm, interesting article

A road or game-changer? | DAWN.COM

**FOR over a century, Ahmadzai Wazirs resented Mehsuds’ domination in their native South Waziristan. The Wazirs continue to grumble over the distribution of resources and privileges between the two tribes.
**
They moan over what they believe the injustices they suffer despite being in majority.

The Mehsuds, they complain, take away the lion’s share of all that comes to Fata’s largest tribal region.

This tribal resentment is mutual and almost entrenched in folklore.

The two tribes have had major flare-ups in the past too, that had claimed several lives, at times prompting clerics from the Wazir tribe to declare “Jihad” against neighbouring Mehsuds.

Yet the two tribes lived in peace side by side — borne largely out of Wazirs’ own compulsion: the road.

**The once-broken down road to Wazirs’ area in the Wana region meanders through the Mehsuds’ heartland. And the wily Mehsuds used this strategic card to their own advantage, closing it down at will to bring the Wazirs into submission.
**
**The Tank-Jandola-Wana road served as the lifeline for Ahmadzai Wazirs.
**
So challenging Mehsuds’ domination in South Waziristan would have been foolhardy.

But all that changed on June 18 this year. The country’s military strategists, propelled by their own security and logistic needs and some wise advice from the civil administration coupled with millions of American dollars, opened a 105-km-long dual carriageway, the Kaur-Gomal-Tanai-Wana road, to rid Wazirs of what they believed was Mehsuds’ perpetual blackmail.

This was a turning point in the Wazir-Mehsud relationship in South Waziristan.

People like 40-year-old Noor Mohammad, a Bahlolzai Mehsud by tribe, could never have imagined that Wazirs would have the nerve to order them to leave Wana in a matter of days.

“This is the will of Allah,” he says, with some remorse.

He is now struggling to find a shelter for his family of 30 people in Tank. This was his fourth displacement since the launch of military operations in South Waziristan.

What is worse, he says, the Wazir driver charged them Rs20,000 to transport them through the same military-built, American-funded road that the Wazirs say, they had attempted so hard to stop for years.

Government officials admit they were the principal movers behind the initiative to get militant Commander Maulvi Nazir evict the displaced Mehsuds from their midst in Wana.

Hiding among the displaced Mehsuds, officials claim, were Tehrik-i-Taliban men who would often cause trouble in a region that has largely remained peaceful, thanks to a peace agreement with Commander Nazir.

“The political administration told us to either get the Mehsuds to agree to register themselves with the authorities or ask them to leave. Since we have a peace agreement with the government, we asked the Mehsud to register but they refused. We had no choice,” Malik Mohammad Arif, a Zalikhel Yargulkhel Wazir and a notable tribal elder, who also represents the Pakhtunkhwa Milli Awami Party in the region, told Dawn by phone.

Getting Maulvi Nazir on board was difficult but he agreed, albeit reluctantly, to play ball, a senior government official told Dawn.

But just when he was making up his mind to order the eviction of Mehsud clansmen from Wana, he was hit by a suicide bombing in Wana bazaar on Nov 29. He survived the attempt.

“This was unmistakably TTP’s work,” a senior security official said.

“It was a pre-emptive move to stop Nazir from ordering the eviction,” he said.

Maulvi Nazir did not lose a single moment.

Soon after the incident, Ahmadzai Wazirs held a jirga to make the decision and announcements were made, ordering the nearly 40,000 Mehsuds to leave Wana by Dec 5.

All agree had there been no Kaur-Gomal-Tanai-Wana road, the Wazirs would never have made that critical decision. “We owe to the Taliban,” a disgruntled Mehsud said.

‘TALIBAN GIFT’: It were the TTP, he said, which forced the authorities to look for an alternative road.

“For 500 years, the Wazirs were beholden to us for passage through the Mehsuds’ territory. The Taliban have given them the gift of Gomal road,” he moaned.

Government officials are optimistic that they could replicate the Mehsuds’ eviction from Wana in Miramshah, North Waziristan. “This is a major initiative. We would like to showcase it elsewhere,” a senior government official said.

“Uthmakhel Wazirs in North Waziristan are three times bigger than Ahmadzai Wazirs. If Ahmadzai could do it, why can’t the Uthmankhels?” he asked.
“We would want them to stand up and kick out the bad guys from their midst too,” he said.

CHANGE IN TTP?: As if part of a larger scheme of things, military officials in the region are also reported to be throwing around feelers if a possible replacement of TTP’s trigger-happy chief, Hakimullah Mehsud, by a “moderate” Waliur Rehman—the group’s top militant commander for Mehsud region, citing irreconcilable differences between the two.

This may be a bit far-fetched, at least in the immediate, foreseeable future, those in the know insist. “I don’t see it happening,” a very senior official with knowledge of the region told Dawn. “They may have differences, but it has not reached the point where we could see any changes at the top,” he said.

For one, the TTP shura is dominated by those close to Hakimullah and there is no indication of a change of mood amongst its members of change of fortune of their radical, ultra-violent leader.

By all accounts, Hakimullah is more violent and has turned out to be a tough fighter for the Pakistani forces, but Waliur Rehman, a Malkhel Mehsud tribesman and a graduate of a religious madressah in Faisalabad, is not a “moderate” either.

In some respects, he has proven himself to be a more tenacious challenger to the military’s presence in his native land, where the security forces have come under increasing attacks, fire-raids, ambushes, motor attacks and roadside bombings since the launch of military operation in 2009.

But even then, some within the JUI-F, with which Waliur Rehman had ties once, are optimistic that, given an opportunity and some concessions, the 42-year-old militant commander could be brought around to stop fighting the state.

“His ascension (as the TTP leader) would be a good omen for Pakistan,” mused a JUI-F lawmaker who claims to have had attempted to mediate between the two sides. His attempts apparently made no headway, finding no backers within the military establishment at the time.

But there are those too, who are sceptical of attempts by some within the establishment to paint Waliur Rehman white. “If this is an attempt to drive a wedge between Waliur Rehman and Hakimullah, it wouldn’t work. But if there are some who genuinely feel that he is a moderate, they should know that a former military commander in Peshawar had once described Baitullah Mehsud a ‘soldier of peace’ too,” an analyst cautioned.

Re: Change of leadership in TTP?

Walir ur Rehman and Hakimullah Mehsud have appeared together in a 40 minutes video to dispel the impression that they have fallen over with each other.

Re: Change of leadership in TTP?

Re: Change of leadership in TTP?

There is a thing called intelligence. If the ISI does not know even the spelling of this bloody thing, why exactly do they even open their mouths?

Re: Change of leadership in TTP?

Our friend Ehsan ullah Ehsan is also in this picture. he seems to be quite content on his performance.

Re: Change of leadership in TTP?

^ His duty is to own anything that happens in the country, except release of new movies :cb: