Chacha Imran joins pitch debate (Criticized Woolmer's 'defensive' attitude)

Imran Khan joins pitch debate

Cricinfo staff

January 21, 2006

Even as the second Test at Faisalabad got underway, the debate over the pitch at Lahore, where 1089 runs were scored for just 8 wickets, continued to simmer.

Imran Khan, former Pakistan captain, wrote in his column in The Hindu: “During my 21 years of international cricket, I have seen almost every team prepare pitches that suit it at home - it is a legitimate home advantage that has been used right from the inception of the game. Hearing the comments of the coach [Bob Woolmer] I am increasingly convinced that the grass on the Lahore track was shaved off in order to make it placid and risk-free.”

Imran added that Woolmer can be forgiven for his contention that the home team has no right to intervene and ask for a pitch that suits its strengths due to the latter’s limited exposure as a player in international cricket. He also criticized the Pakistan coach’s defensive attitude, saying that he should focus more on his team getting 20 wickets and win matches.

Woolmer, however, in his own column in the Indian Express wrote: “For the record, I reiterate that as captain and coach, Inzamam and I will let the pitch committee know what type of pitches we would like, but we then leave it to the groundstaff.”

Talking about Pakistan’s evolution as a world-beater, Imran added that he would like to see Woolmer work on finding a suitable specialist opening partner for Salman Butt, if they are to do well in England later this year.

On India’s own dilemmas, the former fast bowler felt that Rahul Dravid shouldn’t open the innings, his 410-run partnership with Virender Sehwag notwithstanding. He wrote, “The No. 3 slot is a crucial one and Dravid is a vital cog in the Indian batting line-up. Losing him early could be disastrous for the Indians.”

CricInfo


The ultimate question arises. Is Imran correct in his statements? Why, or why not?

Re: Chacha Imran joins pitch debate (Criticized Woolmer's 'defensive' attitude)

You are implying that Imran can be wrong.

Rinse your mouth out with soap!

Re: Chacha Imran joins pitch debate (Criticized Woolmer's 'defensive' attitude)

I think there must be some grass left on the pitch to have a result in a test match.

Re: Chacha Imran joins pitch debate (Criticized Woolmer's 'defensive' attitude)

Was Imran successful in getting 'fast tracks' in his tenure as captain?

Re: Chacha Imran joins pitch debate (Criticized Woolmer’s ‘defensive’ attitude)

Here’s the full article - many more pointed barbs on babloo. Must be some other stuff going on in the background…

** Time for Pakistan to come out of its defensive shell ** * India should not persist with Dravid as opener, writes Imran Khan *

There are times when cricket coaches have to justify their salaries, but when they make bizarre statements to that end, it really amazes me. However, Bob Woolmer can be forgiven for his ridiculous contention that the home team has no right to intervene and ask for a pitch that suits its strengths.
After all, he has played very little international cricket and has not had an extended exposure to the game at the highest level. Neither has he been in any position of responsibility within the game, so his naïve arguments do not come as a surprise.
During my 21 years of international cricket, I have seen almost every team prepare pitches that suit it at home — it is a legitimate home advantage that has been used right from the inception of the game. Hearing the comments of the coach I am increasingly convinced that the grass on the Lahore track was shaved off in order to make it placid and risk-free.
Anyone who knows anything about cricket in Pakistan is aware that the Lahore pitch assists the pacemen if it has grass on it. However, for Bob to know that he would have to leave his computer — God knows what he does on it — and go to the middle and speak to the local officials as well as the captain. He has to go out there and plan on how he can take 20 wickets and win a match rather than just tinker around on a laptop.
I would also like to see Bob work a bit on a specialist opener to partner Salman Butt at the top of the order. The bits and pieces players who are filling in are part of the negative county cricket mindset. The opening slot is a crucial one and it needs no less than a specialist if Pakistan is to do well on the tour of England later this year.
Moving to the Indian side, they too should not persist with the move to promote Rahul Dravid in the batting order, the 410-run partnership notwithstanding. The No. 3 slot is a crucial one and Dravid is a vital cog in the Indian batting line-up. Losing him early could be disastrous for the Indians.
The Indian captain should also consider the option of playing three pacers if he sees even the slightest hint of grass. So he should play Zaheer Khan even if leaving out Harbhajan Singh or Anil Kumble is a tough call.
With both teams having serious problems at the top of the order, I would like to see Inzamam-ul-Haq sending the Indians in if he wins the toss. Even on a placid wicket, the maximum assistance the bowlers will get would be on the morning of the first day. He has the bowling armoury to use even a little moisture and bounce and importantly, batting first could be dangerous for him since one of his openers is a makeshift one.
The hosts must play attacking cricket and look to win this Test. Under no circumstances should they get defensive and wait till the third Test. If they do that, they will be putting too much pressure on themselves and it could prove catastrophic. *(Gameplan)
*

http://www.hindu.com/2006/01/21/stories/2006012106091800.htm

Re: Chacha Imran joins pitch debate (Criticized Woolmer's 'defensive' attitude)

Imran had the luxury of playing alongside Wasim, making (with himself) one of the great duets, tracks were rendered irrelevant.

Re: Chacha Imran joins pitch debate (Criticized Woolmer's 'defensive' attitude)

i'm kinda bored of imrans predictable opinions...wats new!