Pakistan is losing lifetime opportunity for access to two major oil rich places. Iraq and Sudan. Pakistan should send 100,000 troops to Iraq and 20,000 to Darfur. It will serve 3 important objectives:
Help bring peace to locals
Prosperity to thousands of Pakistani workers who would accompany these soldiers.
Easy access to Pakistan based oil companies. Oil drilling and refining is the most lucrative business in the world.
Let’s quit listening to MAToo terrorists. We all know Mullahs only worry about their own halwa with an utter disregard to national interests.
Not that I am against your diatribe against Mullahs. But Oh well...
We DO NOT want our people to be murdered in cold blood. We do not want them to beheaded like the two Pakistani's, like those Nepalis. What do you think Iraqis will welcome Pakistanis on their soil and not view them with suspicion or as US protege???
Unless United Nations is involved in Iraq, I don't think its a good idea to even think about sending our troops to that place.
antibol, besides what you are saying.... Your hatred for mullahs and religious scholars is wierd.
Brother, one day, yours and mine, namaz e jinazah will be offered by a mullah, since you and people like me have no idea about how a namaz e janazah is read.
If you cannot take their place and set a better example, cursing them seems very unjust on your part.
Its not that I am in love with mullahs .... its just that it seems so childish, cursing them in every post.
I sure hate Mullah-cracy, just like my role models Jinnah and Sir Syed. Any problem with that?
BTW you conveniently skipped my suggestion about Darfur. Don't care about the plight of black Muslims?
Here is my rebuttal.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Minerva: *
1. We DO NOT want our people to be murdered in cold blood.
2. We do not want them to beheaded like those Nepalis.
3. What do you think Iraqis will welcome Pakistanis?
[/QUOTE]
That's why my dear, I suggested 100,000 Pak troops on the ground. Precisely to stop those dim-whit two-bit terrorists from beheading our unarmed civilians. With that much force on the ground, Pak civilians will only be working in areas under our control.
Comparing 151 million, nuke capable, with 700,000 strong army, and $12 billion budget Pakistan, with a small village called Nepal is a bit disrespecting. We deserve to be compared with at least Bangladesh ;). Have some mercy Minerva!
You talk about Iraqis. Sure! Sane and moderate Iraqis (majority of the 20 million total population- that is 12% of Pak population) will welcome us and the terrorist goons will hate us. Once we have our big guns there, we can deal with MAToo terrorists.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Minerva: *
Unless United Nations is involved in Iraq, I don't think its a good idea to even think about sending our troops to that place.
[/QUOTE]
You mean blue helmet Pak soldiers are better? Kofi is no soldier. I’d rather have Abized in the ops room any moment.
[quote]
1. Help bring peace to locals
2. Prosperity to thousands of Pakistani workers who would accompany these soldiers.
3. Easy access to Pakistan based oil companies. Oil drilling and refining is the most lucrative business in the world.
[/quote]
Increasingly, the locals don't seem to want peace under the status quo. There is no point linking Pakistan to the emplacement of an unpopular regime. It would just inspire resentment of Pakistan amongst Iraqis.
Many of those Pakistanis workers would end up missing heads.
British oil companies are having trouble gaining access to iraqi oil - what makes you think pakistani companies would fare better. More to the point, Pakistani oil companies lack the resources to fully exploit Pakistan's own oil wealth let alone some other country's.
Pakistan has no business in either Iraq nor Sudan. Worse still, it would alienate many of the government of nations that have long been friendly to us and who are supply lifelines in times of conflict.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by mAd_ScIeNtIsT: *
.....Pakistan has no business in either Iraq nor Sudan. Worse still, it would alienate many of the government of nations that have long been friendly to us and who are supply lifelines in times of conflict.
[/QUOTE]
You mean Sudan will be mad at Pakistan becuase there will peace in Darfur? What kind of crooked logic is that?
Seems like that namak-harams Mirza Aslama Begum, and Hamid-a GUL-badan GUL-ab Jaman has some followers on this board. MA Begum and H Gulbadan should be wearing bengals all the time. These ladies messed up our presence in the ME during 1991. Now is the chance to recover the lost territory.
Prince Sultan AFB, Qatar, and Iraq West will have at least 3 bases for the next 20 years. Aslama Begum, and Hamida Gulbadan followers will let them filled with troops from US, UK, Japan, Bharat, or Bangladesh.
[QUOTE] Originally posted by CM: *
I say let the ******s rot.
[/QUOTE]
The two post shows the most defeatist, buzdil attitude ever seen from Pakistan.