Canada Rules Out Joining Bush's War on Iraq

Canada rules out joining solo U.S. attack on Iraq](Clarifying the Complex | Homepage | Thomson Reuters) Reuters

By David Ljunggren

OTTAWA, Feb 18 (Reuters) - After months of hesitation, Canada finally made it clear on Tuesday that it has no intention of contributing to a U.S.-led attack on Iraq that has not been blessed by the United Nations Security Council. U.S. President George W. Bush has said that if the U.N. backs away from the idea of authorizing force to disarm Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein, he is prepared to wage war with like-minded allies in what he calls a “coalition of the willing”.

Canadian Prime Minister Jean Chretien, wary of antagonizing the country’s most important military ally and trading partner, has, until now, consistently declined to rule out contributing forces to such a coalition. But on Tuesday he told Parliament that Canada would not join an unsanctioned campaign. “We have not been asked and we do not intend to participate in a group of the willing,” he said in reply to a question asking whether Canada would join Bush’s “coalition of willing countries” in an attack on Iraq. “The policy of the government is very clear. If there has to be military activity in Iraq, we want it to be approved by the U.N. Security Council,” he continued.

In a speech last week in Chicago, Chretien strongly urged Bush to tackle the Iraq crisis solely through the United Nations. “If they (the Americans) want to go there all alone, they can go there all alone, but we say they must go with the authorization of the United Nations. If they don’t, the international system of peace and security will probably be more destabilized than it need be,” he said on Tuesday. Chretien and his senior ministers have consistently said that if the United Nations does sanction an assault on Iraq, Canada will take part.

Whether Canada’s over-stretched armed forces could contribute much is questionable, since last week Ottawa announced it would send up to 2,000 troops for a year to take part in a U.N. peacekeeping mission based in Kabul. The right-wing Canadian Alliance opposition party and other conservative critics accuse Chretien of damaging Canada’s traditionally close ties with the United States by not lining up more closely alongside Bush. But Chretien is facing unrest inside his own Liberal Party over the issue and is well aware that polls show a large majority of Canadians oppose the idea of joining a U.S.-led attack outside the auspices of the United Nations.

Foreign Minister Bill Graham on Tuesday reiterated the government’s view that Iraq did not have much time left to demonstrate compliance with U.N. resolutions calling on it to get rid of any weapons of mass destruction. Earlier in the day Canadian officials rapped what they described as “unacceptable” limitations imposed upon U.N. weapons inspections in Iraq.

Canada is part of that “old world” you know if we accept ever changing American terminology. :hehe:

way to go Jean

its about time!

Does Canada even have a military?

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Stu: *
Does Canada even have a military?
[/QUOTE]

Tsk tsk...sour grapes. :)

Well if Canada doesn;t go, I am sure the Pakistanis or the Bangladeshis will be there for the cleanup. No problem..And Stu, Canada does have a military. They however don;t have a navy.

What the heck? Of course we have a navy. Ever heard of the Maritime provinces, ever heard of the units based in Halifax, Nova Scotia ? i guess not, although frigates from there are on routine patrol around the Arabian sea (as part of enforcing the embargo). Canada even contributed, immediately after 9-11, towards the ‘campaign against terrorism’ at the request of American officials. Hey if the US doesn’t want (or need) our help, then don’t ask for it and don’t criticize Canada when we refuse to join a war not sanctioned by the United Nations.

Nadia, do you have a humorous bone in the body? Come on Girl!! :slight_smile:

Canada Warship Seizes Tanker in Arabian Sea" – Reuters, Feb. 8, 2002

CANADIAN WARSHIP SEIZES TANKER IN… WAIT…
CANADA HAS A WARSHIP?
Oh Right, and Switzerland Has Nuclear Weapons

Arabian Sea (SatireWire.com) — Canadian television reported Friday that a Canadian warship in the Arabian Sea had seized a tanker suspected of smuggling oil from Iraq, leading many to suspect that the report was a hoax.

The Halifax Class frigate Vancouver.
Honest.
“You’re kidding, right? Canada has a warship?” asked U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. "Like for war?

“Does Canada know?” he added.

“Nobody was more stunned than we were,” said Kali Omari, first mate of the seized vessel. “We saw this frigate steaming toward us, and we were worried, but then we saw the maple leaf on the flag, and we thought, ‘Oh, Canadians. What the hell do they want?’”

When an officer of the HMCS Vancouver announced that the tanker was about to be boarded, the crew of the detained ship was confused, said Omari, but their confusion quickly turned to anger when they saw what the Canadians sailors were carrying.

“They were armed. With guns,” said Omari. “Canadians. With guns. And a warship. What is this world coming to?”

“They were pretty rude, too,” Omari added. “They started asking us all sorts of questions, like ‘Where did that oil come from?’ But first we wanted to know who gave them the damn warship.”

According to Canadian defense officials, the Vancouver is one of four frigates deployed in the region to assist in the U.S.-led Afghanistan conflict. The tanker was stopped, officials said, because its cargo of crude oil violated United Nations sanctions, which prohibit Iraq from selling oil unless in exchange for food and medicine.

The U.N. said the incident is already under investigation, and promised swift action against those found responsible for giving the Canadians guns. Initial findings indicate that the Vancouver crew may have been watching too many American television shows.

RECOMMEND
THIS PAGE
Copyright © 2002, SatireWire.

http://www.satirewire.com/news/feb02/warship.shtml

Nadia :k: . And we shouldn’t forget the success of our Canadian Joint Task Force (special forces) in Afghanistan in direct combat. Although our Navy may be small, our troops are highly trained, and very capable.

Fret Wizard, Yes, true, i think. Albeit our navy is small but it tries to make do with the resources that are given to it by the government.

If the US doesn't need Canadian services, then that's great. Saves us the time and money from having to go and assist our southern neighbour (when we don't even get credit for it anyways).

Chretien's stance vis-a-vis Iraq is great, although i would prefer that he not endorse a war even if it is sanctioned by the UN.

ChaltaHai: Stop bothering the Canadian army...it might start crying.

master ji master ji, woh jo chalta hai na, ussne meri navy..err dawaat se Toba le liya hai.

:)

I heard that there are a lot of Canadian Frigates, especially in the Toronto area. Not that there's anything wrong with that...

Excuse my lack of knowledge about the Canadian culture.....what is Frigates?

Channji: Are we also to excuse your lack of insights into the Seinfeld culture? Not that there is anything wrong with that...EH!

A "Frigate" is a warship. Has nothing to do with Canadian culture.

ChaltaHai: You know I am very red blooded American. So excuse such details please.:)

Of course if it is has do with war it has nothng to do with Canadian culture. Thanks.

ps: I wish my Canadian niece could read this post...damn we have such a fight over this issue....she heard in school that America has a grand plan of overtaking the whole world one peice at a time. So whenever I talk to her I tell her we are getting ready to attack you guys after Iraq. It is fun.

Leave it to you guys to stick to the topic.

Chrétien: We won’t go to Iraq without UN approval, Mike Trickey and Janice Tibbetts
19 February 2003, The Ottawa Citizen

…] Mr. Chrétien implored the U.S. to act within the framework of the UN last week at a speech to the Council of Foreign Relations in Chicago, saying that is the best way to ensure American and global security in the future.

“I am convinced that, given a proper chance, the United Nations will fulfil its obligations to the world community, that it will back up its principles with resolve,” he said at the time.

Mr. Chrétien made the decision not to participate in an American-led coalition, which so far has about 20 members, after speaking on the weekend to six leaders of allied nations who are evenly divided on how to best force Iraq to comply with UN Resolution 1441 demanding that it disarm and to fully co-operate with inspectors searching for weapons of mass destruction.

…] Canada has not been clear on what sort of military contribution it could make in the event of war, especially after committing last week to deploying about 3,000 troops to Afghanistan over a one-year period starting this summer. Such a large deployment would leave few soldiers available for other tasks, though Canadian naval and air forces are in the Gulf area now as part of an international anti-terrorist operation. Strategic analysts say it is likely those forces would simply be retasked with responsibility for the war in Iraq.

International Development Minister Susan Whelan said yesterday that Canada is considering a new request from the UN for contingency planning for humanitarian aid for Iraq. Canada has already pledged $1.7 million as part of the UN’s original $37-million package. The UN now says an additional $123 million is needed and is seeking about $4 million from Canada.

$1.7 million pledge? wah kiya baat hai.
That is 7 cents per Iraqi...ok 11 cents Canadian.
Why does not the great nation of Canada send a candy each for Iraqis(you can ship it on our Frigates):)

Whoa..Canada will provide a total of $5.7 million if all works out. Wow!!!

I think we spend that much on Janitorial services. Canada has enjoyed the boons of living pretty much worry free under the US security umbrella. Low defense budget even lesser regional security concerns.