Re: Canada denies Visa to Indian Army Official citing War Crimes against humanity.
^^they can stop every terror except the one their own people are making around the world:)
they are all same bro.bunch of war criminals selling fear and oppression to minorities. Soldiers from indian army are sent on deputation to BSF.they are not martians and have same training and state of mind. a monkey is an ape remember.
'Canada has the greatest respect for Indian Armed forces' whats your source??prove it
really.. a war criminal is who massacred millions of bengalis in a ethnic cleanising. a war criminal is who is killing pashtuns, a war criminal is who sends terrorists in its every neighbour and friend country, a war criminal is who killed its own elected prime minister, a war criminal is who usurp the elected govt.
i dont see BSF doing any of it, it is NOT army. it is para military.
you also came from the same apes remember.
Re: Canada denies Visa to Indian Army Official citing War Crimes against humanity.
^lol u can say whatever you want but the bottom line is Indian Army is recognised as war criminals by canada and u can do nothing about it.
kabhi kabhi scoochta hun sach waqai hi karwa lagta hai.lol
^lol u can say whatever you want but the bottom line is Indian Army is recognised as war criminals by canada and u can do nothing about it.
kabhi kabhi scoochta hun sach waqai hi karwa lagta hai.lol
Probably your belief makes you sleep better and enjoy your weekend.
It's a shame to see the Canadians backing down from the brave stance taken by their High Commission in Delhi. The BSF is without a doubt guilty of unspeakable war crimes; I think the Canadian High Commission should be lauded for bringing attention to the issue. If the US can deny Narendra Modi a visa, surely the Canadians can keep these nobody war criminals out.
hO ! what about your Pakistani mates who push scores of terrorists inside Kashmir and other parts of India to commit terrorist acts and kill common people inside Kashmir.
hO ! what about your Pakistani mates who push scores of terrorists inside Kashmir and other parts of India to commit terrorist acts and kill common people inside Kashmir.
At least you're not denying that the BSF have committed terrorist acts and are guilty of the massacre of innocent civilians. While I find it disturbing that you're attempting to rationalize their war crimes, it's still a step forward from the typical Indian viewpoint, where the Indian armed forces and their pro-India millitants/terrorists are incapable of doing wrong.
Re: Canada denies Visa to Indian Army Official citing War Crimes against humanity.
/\/\/ya....indian armed forces are really terrorists....but the result is entirely different from bangla desh situation....why.....
i think it is time to bash the canadian authorities as they have changed their opinion about indian army...
hO ! what about your Pakistani mates who push scores of terrorists inside Kashmir and other parts of India to commit terrorist acts and kill common people inside Kashmir.
WoW! Pot calling kettle black... Can't help draging bad pakis in evey thread regardless.
At least you're not denying that the BSF have committed terrorist acts and are guilty of the massacre of innocent civilians. While I find it disturbing that you're attempting to rationalize their war crimes, it's still a step forward from the typical Indian viewpoint, where the Indian armed forces and their pro-India millitants/terrorists are incapable of doing wrong.
See..Janab...Army is not present in other states of India. Becuase there are no state sponsosred terrorists and killings of innocents. I completely agree that there could be some collateral damage. But you can not completely generalize Indian army like Pak army's involvement in millions of Bangalis massacre. No terrorism then no army..it is that simple.
You are accusing other posters they are supporting war crimes. Why can't you you dare to agree that thousands of innocent pundits were killed and kicked out from their homes. Can't you feel pain in that? Be rational.
WoW! Pot calling kettle black... Can't help draging bad pakis in evey thread regardless.
Exactly.. you are doing the same. Take out your nose from the bull's ass and smell some coffee. He is just giiving rebuttal.
/\/\/ya....indian armed forces are really terrorists....but the result is entirely different from bangla desh situation....why.....
i think it is time to bash the canadian authorities as they have changed their opinion about indian army...
It seems you like the word 'Terrori$ts'. I know why....Do not take out frustration on others being called as Terrori$t$.
Yes..result is completely different from BD..there you have tried to wipe out all Bangalis by killing millions of people.
Exactly.. you are doing the same. Take out your nose from the bull's ass and smell some coffee. He is just giiving rebuttal.
Love to step on an Indians tail and then see the outburst... Indian Obsession with bad Pakis have no bounds... I'd suggest you take yopur head out of your own ass, for a change that is...
The army isn’t present in other places because there are no other areas in India where 90% of the population wants independence.
Could be some collateral damage?!?!
You Indians have NO IDEA what your army did in Kashmir. NO IDEA. Massacring thousands of unarmed protesters is not collateral damage. Setting fire to entire villages and neighborhoods, then opening fire on terrified civilians as they flee their burning homes is not collateral damage. Kidnapping countless civilians and killing them in staged encounters and extrajudicial executions is not collateral damage. Gang raping entire villages is not collateral damage. Those mass graves they’re finding, full of thousands of unidentified remains, are not filled with “collateral damage.”
You people live in complete denial of what your army has done, just parroting the same tired old propaganda about terrorists and Pandits. I have news for you - your army (and the pro-India militant groups they supported) didn’t just kill civilians when they got caught in the crossfire. They have committed war crimes. They have massacred thousands of people. Your attempts to rationalize your government’s crimes by comparing them to bigger war crimes (it’s not a war crime till you’ve killed a couple hundred thousand? is that your logic?), or even more gallingly, by dismissing civilian massacres as “collateral damage” just reflect on your own level of denial.
Why can’t you admit that your army massacred tens of thousands of innocent Kashmiri civilians? Can’t you feel any pain in that? Or were they just expendable “collateral damage” because most of them were Muslim?
In any case, I’ve never denied that hundreds of innocent Pandits were killed. What I have disputed is this Indian delusion that the Pandits were somehow the only casualties of the Kashmir conflict, and the gross exaggeration of their numbers for propaganda purposes by Hindu extremists.
According to government estimates, a total of 219 Pandits were killed by the militants over the past 20 years (source). Even if you double that number, heck even if you triple it, we’re still not talking about “thousands” of people. As I’ve said before, that’s still 219 deaths too many. Then again, in January of 1990 alone, your army massacred over 300 unarmed civillian protesters (source) - but they were mostly Muslim, and therefore expendable according to you Indians I imagine. You people have made it abundantly clear that out of the tens of thousands of people killed over the course of this conflict, those 219 are the only ones that matter.
janab-e-ali,
Now we are talking! As i was telling u in previous thread, its time vale of K decides to join papa pakistan. Come home to dady, honey, we have been waiting. :D)
You Indians have NO IDEA what your army did in Kashmir. NO IDEA. Massacring thousands of unarmed protesters is not collateral damage. Setting fire to entire villages and neighborhoods, then opening fire on terrified civilians as they flee their burning homes is not collateral damage. Kidnapping countless civilians and killing them in staged encounters and extrajudicial executions is not collateral damage. Gang raping entire villages is not collateral damage. Those mass graves they're finding, full of thousands of unidentified remains, are not filled with "collateral damage." .
if it is really true....why the situation is not same as it was during bangla desh revolt...
10 million refugees entred india...thousands of women were pregnant after mass rapes...
anyhow if janab is right...we have no option but to support the revolt in kashmir...
ya, hindus have left the valley and for that also these peace loving people find fault with the indian govt....what the hell this hippocrisy is...
Because the analogy you Indians repeatedly try to forcing in to justify your war crimes is completely flawed. The population of Dhaka alone is millions higher than that of the entire Kashmir valley. East Pakistan was also subjected to highly concentrated atrocities - according to the lowest, most conservative estimates 200-300,000 civilians killed in a matter of months of full-on warfare, as opposed Kashmir where roughly 70,000 civilians have been killed over years of conflict.
Frankly, I never claimed that the ongoing assault on the Kashmir has been on the same scale as the 1971 atrocities in East Pakistan. It is, however, an utterly sickening indication of how depraved and bigoted you people truly are if you believe that massacring tens of thousands of innocent civilians is acceptable as long as its not carried out on a full genocidal scale.
There’s an estimated 100,000 internally displaced Kashmiri Muslims. In addition, there are tens of thousands of refugees living in squalid camps in Azad Kashmir since 1989…joining the estimated 1.5 million refugees from Indian-administered J&K living in Pakistan today (source).
“In addition, the Azad Kashmir government manages relief camps for refugees from Indian-administered Kashmir, the bulk of whom arrived after the situation on the Indian side worsened in 1989. Many more of the refugees (roughly 1.5 million) live elsewhere in Azad Kashmir and throughout Pakistan.”
UN High Commission for Refugees
In 2005, a study by Doctors Without Borders found that Kashmiri women are victims of sexual violence at high rates than in virtually any other conflict region in the world, including Sierra Leone, Chechnya, and Sri Lanka.
The handful of Indians who actually know what kind of atocities their governmentis guilty of do. Bitter communalists like yourself probably will never change though.
Janab, do you care to explain why the situation worsened after 1989. Violence comes wth violence. You got the support from your pseudo lovers and started to kick out your own neighbors. why did not you stop them, becuase you hated hindu population. I have never read anywhere that muslims in Kashmir were against atrocities onhindus.
If Indians argue about bangla masscre, it is flawed argument. How come you are comparing refugess who are living POK and pundit refugess elsewhere in India. Are you not hypocrite?
I see that kashmiris should not have taken violent support from their pseudo lovers. Anyway, force does not work now. Kashmir indpendence or no independce only thru talks.
You agree that IDK fate was not improved eventhough they are in their dream land. Why?
janab-e-ali,
U are giving more reasons to come home to dady. We are also giving B&B to HUM. We are keepers of ur 1.5m brothers from IHK, not to mention our invited guests helping u to tie down 700k hindu soldiers.
Why are u so ungrateful? Why independence? Come home to papa, pakistan. Brotherly people are waiting for u!
Because that’s when the organized, popular uprising against Indian rule began.
Already responded to all of this:
http://www.paklinks.com/gs/world-affairs/427463-canada-denies-visa-to-indian-army-official-citing-war-crimes-against-humanity-2.html#post7417383
When did refugee camps in Azad Kashmir become a dream land? Kashmiris want a Kashmir free of Indian occupation, not a squalid tent city in Pakistan.