Re: Can we define God by the way of science?
Um, I never said that my beliefs will be deemed as “fact” by the scientific community. The scientific process is heavily based upon observation among other steps. If I said that Allah encourages us to understand him through OBSERVATION of the natural world, I would think that the scientist community would find that sensible and not “ridiculous” as science itself deals with observation. I didn’t bring a heavy amount of religion into the discussion. I brought up a connection that any reasonable person, scientist or otherwise, religious or otherwise, can agree upon. But it seems to have deeply vexed you. Have you created some sort of rubric for this thread where you “grade” members’ posts for how valid they would be for the “scientific community”…hmm?
What “fairy tales” have I used? TLK brought up parting of the red see and Noah’s Ark; I didn’t. I shared my belief in these phenomenons based on my opinion of the natural, observable world. I certainly wasn’t on a mission to prove that Noah’s Ark and the parting of a sea as truth. I mentioned religion in the most minor of ways…and look how incensed you’ve become.
I will remind you again for the umpteenth time…and will do so again and again and again. You either keep forgetting or do not care that the majority of the people here are religious and they will not appreciate you calling accounts in their books as “fairy tales.” That is very inconsiderate. Show some restraint, have some tameez.