By 2025 30% of the population will be muslim

[diwana]

Re: By 2025 30% of the population will be muslim

@Shak09

You’re confused here and one with the flawed argument, not me. Religious freedom means letting people express their religion safely and whenever and wherever they want. Hence we have mosques, synagogues, mandirs in the West etc.

What it does NOT mean is forcing businesses to do what they can’t do for whatever reason. I have no problem going in a place and reading ‘‘Sorry we do not serve halal food, however you are welcome to try our vegetarian menu’’. If I have a problem with that then there are plenty of halal places. If there aren’t halal places then that usually means the place has very few Muslims which means every business is within their rights to not be forced to to use halal meat for so few.

Let me know which hotel did that and I will help you sue them. Otherwise its just another random statement that every right wing Westerner uses against Islam as well.

Again, sorry I missed this one.

1- You said “Religious freedom means letting people express their religion safely and whenever and wherever they want. Hence we have mosques, synagogues, mandirs in the West etc.”

I think what I can recollect you are either a law student (SIL as I made joke on you a while ago) or probably still a student in Law.

Allow me to explain that religious freedom does not mean expressing religion freely within the confinement of mosques, synagogues or mandirs.

If this was true then what would be the difference from the places which would not allow religious freedom?

Now about ‘forcing business’. **I never support or asked for ‘forcing business for ‘accommodating’ muslims or any religious person’s dietary needs’.
**
But what you did not get from my earlier posts the very meaning of ‘accommodating’ the Muslims.

Yes, fish or vegetarian would be quite acceptable for a lot of Muslims and even Kosher food is considered halal for a lot of Muslims **for not having pork in it and having monotheistic rituals similar to Jews.
**

For the last statement, yo need to read my ‘Third statement’ again. I never complaned about anyone for that statement, instead I proposed that statement out of sarcasm. Hence no need to sue anyone.