Bush made up claims of New evidence of Iraqi nuclear ability!

http://www.msnbc.com/news/802167.asp?cp1=1
Sept. 7 — Seeking to build a case Saturday that Iraqi President Saddam Hussein was developing weapons of mass destruction, President Bush cited a satellite photograph and a report by the U.N. atomic energy agency as evidence of Iraq’s impending rearmament. But in response to a report by NBC News, a senior administration official acknowledged Saturday night that the U.N. report drew no such conclusion, and a spokesman for the U.N. agency said the photograph had been misinterpreted.

BUSH AND BRITISH Prime Minister Tony Blair talked to reporters before opening about three hours of talks at Camp David, Bush’s presidential retreat in Maryland.

Blair cited a newly released satellite photo of Iraq identifying new construction at several sites linked in the past to Baghdad’s development of nuclear weapons. And both leaders mentioned a 1998 report by the U.N.-affiliated International Atomic Energy Agency, or IAEA, that said Saddam could be six months away from developing nuclear weapons.

“I don’t know what more evidence we need,” Bush said as he greeted Blair for a brainstorming session on Iraq. “We owe it to future generations to deal with this problem"

Contrary to Bush’s claim, however, the 1998 IAEA report did not say that Iraq was six months away from developing nuclear capability, NBC News’ Robert Windrem reported Saturday.

Instead, Windrem reported, the Vienna, Austria-based agency said in 1998 that Iraq had been six to 24 months away from such capability before the 1991 Persian Gulf War and the U.N.-monitored weapons inspections that followed.

The war and the inspections destroyed much of Iraq’s nuclear infrastructure and required Iraq to turn over its highly enriched uranium and plutonium, Windrem reported.

Mark Gwozdecky, a spokesman for the U.N. agency, disputed Bush’s and Blair’s assessment of the satellite photograph, which was first publicized Friday. Contrary to news service reports, there was no specific photo or building that aroused suspicions, he told Windrem.

The photograph in question was not U.N. intelligence imaging but simply a picture from a commercial satellite imaging company, Gwozdecky said. He said that the IAEA reviewed commercial satellite imagery regularly and that, from time to time, it noticed construction at sites it had previously examined.

Gwozdecky said the new construction indicated in the photograph was no surprise and that no conclusions were drawn from it. “There is not a single building we see,” he said.

boy there getting kinda desperate to get evdience now i expect a bin ladin video filmed in baghdad to suddenly appear on a tv screen near you!

All this propaganda is to feed the gullible American public.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by google: *
All this propaganda is to feed the gullible American public.
[/QUOTE]

Gullible american public what an understatement!

they work like 60 hours a week come home drink beer put tv on and they get bombarded with lets bomb these bad people in iraq because they got nuclear bombs all over the joint!

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by ak47: *

Gullible american public what an understatement!

they work like 60 hours a week come home drink beer put tv on and they get bombarded with lets bomb these bad people in iraq because they got nuclear bombs all over the joint!
[/QUOTE]

What a surprise ak47 has lumped all Americans into one generalization. Another brilliant post, something that is now expected from you ak47, don’t let us down. You’re the preacher who says "do as I say not as I do”. Hypercritic's are "all over this joint"!

There is some truth to AK47's statement. Without acess to the higher spectrum of cable, many less affluent Americans may not get a proper view of the issues. One possible viewpoint from such a quarter may be, whta's the problem, we are the top military capability in the world. Actually there is a bright spot in media coverage for the poorer among us and that is Public Broadcasting, which tends to get deep into the issues. This is available for the general viewer. Remember some Republicans wanted to squelch funding for this, at one time. It is interesting to note that Seminole makes a comment of equal stupidity. Many Arabs can and do read the papers. My perusal of some Arabic news sites has a relatively high degree of insightful news. It is even more fascinating to see Ex-US military men and some Jewish commentary there. Not eveything is blatantly anti-Semitic.

To say that less affluent Americans do not have cable access and therefore may not have an understanding of the issues is extremely naive. Whatever access Americans have to cable TV, it is at an all-time high and dwarves that of any Arab country. What was the situation 20 years ago when everyone had only 3 TV stations? Were we all living in the Dark Ages?

Besides, is that the only medium for Americans to gather their information? Many Arabs can and do read papers, but so do Americans. They also have several news magazines to choose from, the highest percentage of internet users and a much higher rate of college educated people.

My point is that the gullibility of the American people is overplayed on this board, not to indict the Arab world for uneducation. Whatever information Americans (rich or poor) do have access to, it is much more and less subjective than the news they receive in any Arab country. Now who's going to be more gullible - those with more information and education, or those with little education and state-controlled news?

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by underthedome: *

What a surprise ak47 has lumped all Americans into one generalization. Another brilliant post, something that is now expected from you ak47, don’t let us down. You’re the preacher who says "do as I say not as I do”. Hypercritic's are "all over this joint"!
[/QUOTE]

Underthedome

what do they say if the truth hurts and all that! I not saying the entire american public is like this but a vast majority is and i have seen it first hand!

Just look at times of war fever and nation bashing how they behave and you will see this effect of brain numbing tv trash in full effect!

A bunch of morons sitting in a white chamber what else you consider them to be?!

Lack of hard evidence that Iraq possesses WMD? Then quickly start buttering up the UN and its member nations.

After 18 years away America rejoins Unesco in surprise announcement, Owen Bowcott
13 September 2002, The Guardian

Eighteen years after withdrawing from Unesco in protest at its alleged mismanagement, America is to rejoin the United Nations’ educational, scientific and cultural organisation, President Bush announced in New York yesterday.

The decision, greeted with applause by delegates at the UN general assembly, surprised critics of the Bush ad ministration which has been accused of flouting international cooperation on the environment and arms control.

“As a symbol of our commitment to human dignity, the United States will return to Unesco,” Mr Bush declared during his speech lambasting Saddam Hussein’s regime in Iraq. “This organisation has been reformed and America will participate fully in its mission to advance human rights and tolerance and learning.”

Unesco, based in Paris, was created at the end of the second world war to combat intolerance, ignorance and racism. By the mid-1980s it was facing claims that it was corrupt, politicised and mismanaged. Under the leadership of Senegal’s Amadou Mbow it promoted a controversial “new world information order” which the western media believed amounted to censorship.

The United States pulled out in 1984 during Ronald Reagan’s presidency. The then secretary of state George Shultz said Unesco had strayed from its original purpose. At the time, the United States provided a quarter of Unesco’s budget.

Britain also withdrew from the organisation in the 1980s but decided to rejoin in 1997 when the Labour government came to power. Unesco’s current director, a Japanese career diplomat, Koichiro Matsuura, was elected in November 1999 with a mandate to simplify its sprawling bureau cracy and woo back Washington.

Mr Matsuura provoked staff protests, and even a short hunger strike by two employees, when he dismissed 20 senior advisers and suspended more than 100 promotions and appointments that his predecessor, Federico Mayor of Spain, had put in place just before leaving.

Unesco recently revealed that Saudi Arabia, Iran, Pakistan, Algeria and other states had asked the organisation for assistance in breaking the association between Islam and terrorism that has developed in the minds of many.

A senior US official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said Unesco “still has work to do” on reform.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Nadia_H: *
Lack of hard evidence that Iraq possesses WMD? Then quickly start buttering up the UN and its member nations.

[/QUOTE]

It just couldn't be that Unesco actually has made progress in cleaning up its act sufficient to warrant US participation and contributions again could it? Nah. It has to be some ulterior motive. I wonder how many UN member states will now throw their support to a US invasion of Iraq based upon this announcement.

I'd prefer to view this as just one more example of the fact that W. represents a new kind of compassionate conservative. :) He has now even out-compassioned Clinton and his trembling lower lip.