[thumb=B]Adolfbush.JPG[/thumb]
PA .....excellent analogies. Dont forget the rampant use of the term "motherland" "homeland" which are chillingly similar to the 3rd reich's. For those who say the civil liberites and the foundations of a true democracy established over 200+ years cannot be eroded in 4 years of one president's term....go read the patriot act and soon to be passed TIA law.
Bush - Hitler... big difference. Hitler actually was a very smart leader. For Bush, I don't think that I need to elaborate. I can really define the terms, but then I don't think that it's appropiate for these forums.
there are nswers in your own text
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Deewaanagi: *
This is twisted logic. Let me try to straighten it out. You're saying that America attacked Iraq for Israel's sake (which is just stupid, for too many reasons to elucidate here).
.....
America benefits from Israel's existence only insofar as it is America's only dependable ally in the Middle East.
Believe me, America would be far happier if they could find some way to placate Palestinians AND keep Israel a strong ally in the Middle East.
Iran and Syria have been threatened by the USA NOT because they were just Muslim, but because Syria has started shuttling jihadis across the border into Iraq and Iran has been sending over agents to disrupt the coming occupation.
That they're Muslim countries has nothing to do with it, unless you somehow believe that they've done those things ONLY BECAUSE they are Muslim. In which case, I've gotta ask you: do you think being Muslim necessarily means being anti-American?
By the way, I do appreciate your willingness to discuss this, instead of just snorting and ignoring people who disagree with you!
[/QUOTE]
just give my one answer why US can see non existant WMD in all islamic or other not friendly counteries? and cant see existant WMD of allies??
why double standards?
i agree its not war against muslims but against all counteries who dont obey USA completely. Thats another thing most of them are islamic.
why non western blood is cheap when it comes to US standards? 1 american or ally will be a very big issue, but killing 100000 by planned sanctions or bombs are just worthless to mention?
i am not thinking on relegious lines here. US only deriven by its own interests at any cost, leaving UN or whole world aside. may be this arrogance liked by american people but its not seen good to other world.
america has created a might of economy which in reality is not sustainable, so it has to do these kind of wars to create oppertunities, for corporate america, and defence industry. we will be seeing this more often in the comming future.
US goes with UN if it allows what it wants. it doesnt need UN when its not.
about the topic!
bush and hitler... has only one thing common both are evil! hitler was genious but bush doesnt have anything called brain.