Your reasoning is totally biased and twisted. I didnt see one argument you put forward which makes any sense. I was just watching a programme on British TV, remember they are Bush's poodles. Even they were saying that with the primaries for the next election round the corner no American presidential candidate dare upset Israel because of its powerful lobbies. They were disucssing this in the light of the so called road map issued by the Bush administration to pull the wool over the muslim eyes. So much of your logic on Israel V America policy. The whole world knows how much influence Israel has, If you don't well time for you to go and do some research.
Iran and Syria are being threatened because they are muslim countries and more so because they are a thorn in the Israeli eyes. If shuttling jehadis across the border is such a cirme then why is America not issuing the same threats to JORDAN. Watch CNN and Fox news the news you will trust and you will see that the jehadis are crossing the border from Jordan as well right in fornt of the eyes of the cameras. So where is the threat, or do Americans not issue threats to puppet regimes or the ones who are no threat to Israel. Get real.
Lets look at the muslim world. Afghanistan was attacked, thousands of innocent people were killed and the Americans fail to acheive their objective which was to capture or kill OBL or Mullah Omar. Have you heard about them recently?
Then Iraq was started, in the name of getting rid of WMD. It was a cover up to attack a muslim country and soon became clear that the objective changed from WMD to overthrow the regime and try and warn others in the region.
Tell me something, if destruction of WMD is the objective then why is Israel not being asked to destroy its nuclear weapons. Show me one statement by Bush asking Israel to do so? Why not? I hope you wont skirt the issue and reply to it. That might tell you who is under whose influence.
Wasn't it Bush who used the word crusade first??? Don't tell me he is stupid enough not to realise the implications of this. Or maybe he is?