British response

[LuxuryItem]

Re: British response

@Verizon

If you dont know what he means by “Muslim Village” then obviously you are pretty clueless.

You do? Let’s hear it, shabash.

I like when you all get threatened by a desi taking a stance that is against the majority.

Now now, don’t get overly dramatic, you are an entertainment and nothing more.

Oh BTW LI blunt question: do you agree with the 9/11 and 7/7 bombings that It is ok for militant muslims to wreak havoc on western interests by killing unarmed innocent citizens? Yes/No

If you have to ask that, “then obviously you are pretty clueless”. [edited]

[Ohioguy]

Re: British response

Tom Friedman is a Jewish commentator for the New York Times. He won a Pulitzer Prize for his coverage of the Sabra and Shatilla massacres. He was in Beirut at the time, and he published a huge article exposing Sharon among others. He was one of the first witnesses to the massacre. His credentials are in order.

Juan Cole is a typical left wing college professor at a less than prestigious school. He is a professor of Islamic studies, and has won awards for his Blog.

[LuxuryItem]

Re: British response

@Ohioguy

Tom Friedman is a Jewish commentator for the New York Times. He won a Pulitzer Prize for his coverage of the Sabra and Shatilla massacres. He was in Beirut at the time, and he published a huge article exposing Sharon among others. He was one of the first witnesses to the massacre. His credentials are in order.

Juan Cole is a typical left wing college professor at a less than prestigious school. He is a professor of Islamic studies, and has won awards for his Blog.

Dan Rather was credible once too.

[Reza_Pahlavi]

Re: British response

@Ohioguy

Tom Friedman is a Jewish commentator for the New York Times. He won a Pulitzer Prize for his coverage of the Sabra and Shatilla massacres. He was in Beirut at the time, and he published a huge article exposing Sharon among others. He was one of the first witnesses to the massacre. His credentials are in order.

Yes, and despite what Sharon did at Sabra and Shatila, Friedman (like you) has been supporting his murderous policies ever since, and spouting other anti-Muslim garbage for years as well. You see what Friedman realised (like Hilary Clinton) is that if you dare criticise Israel, it will be your first and probably last time, and that you will have to spend all your time after that kissing upto zionists and defending their genocidal policies. His credentials, Pulitzer prize or not, are not worth much in light of all this.

[Mr_Fraudia]

Re: British response

@ak47

Yeah they have given islamic dawah is that haram in your view ? the moron is yourself for labelling entire muslims.

Harrass umm if you want harrassment try meeting the British Police one day!

oooh so we smoked out an HT rodent here

HT giving islamic dawah? abay chal…as if we dont know what that group of crackpots is all about. bunch of nerdy psychotic trash talking twerps.

[Mr_Fraudia]

Re: British response

@Verizon

I laugh when I am referred to as a “self-loathing, racist, gora-wannabe”.

hey laughter is good for health. since I have been called the same, can we incorporate register the group as a tax exempt not for profit entity?

[Verizon]

Re: British response

Sounds like a plan, the not so funny ppl like LI and pyariclarki can use our services so they can "laughter the best medicine"

[Verizon]

Re: British response

@LuxuryItem

You do? Let’s hear it, shabash.

Now now, don’t get overly dramatic, you are an entertainment and nothing more.

If you have to ask that, “then obviously you are pretty clueless”.

regarding my question:Why cat got your tongue. Dont want to be labeled as a pro-Killer, pro-terrorist.

regarding Muslim village=Ummah.
[edited]

[ThE-mAcHiNiSt]

Re: British response

It kind of makes sense to clamp down on these extremist religous group who sympathise with the terrorists and spread their infrastructure on foreign soils. Britain ought to have done that long, long ago, and put a hold on their activities.......and now they're paying the price for their inaction!

[AvgAmericanGirl]

Re: British response

@Verizon

Sounds like a plan, the not so funny ppl like LI and pyariclarki can use our services so they can “laughter the best medicine”

I agree.

Laughter is the best medicine.

[ak47]

Re: British response

@Fraudz

oooh so we smoked out an HT rodent here

HT giving islamic dawah? abay chal…as if we dont know what that group of crackpots is all about. bunch of nerdy psychotic trash talking twerps.

I am not a member of HT but i have met them many time and they are sincere muslims who do better than some time wasters who spend there time insulting other muslims.

[Lajawab]

Re: British response

@underthedome

There is a difference between freedom of speech and the freedom to spread violence. I’m not for censorship but when those use speech to incite violence against innocents I’m for blowing their mouths away.

So do we…

When Ann Coulter, O’Reilly and others openly talk about invading Iran or Syria I guess their mouths should be blown off too…Why don’t you start with them?

[AvgAmericanGirl]

Re: British response

@Lajawab

So do we…

When Ann Coulter, O’Reilly and others openly talk about invading Iran or Syria I guess their mouths should be blown off too…Why don’t you start with them?

Lawajab,

Thats “fair and balanced” Fox News for ya.

“Callous and Irresponsible” describes them better..

or better yet…

“Properly Improper Propaganda”

or

“dirty news…done dirt cheap”

Did you happen to catch the fox interview of Joel Rosenberg?

The author of " The Ezekial Option" ?

A fictional thriller about nukes depicting U.S. past the point of no return in nuclear confrontation with Iran the featured protagonist.

The interview by Fox News was done in a manner that insinuated truth. Almost as if it were an actual news story, rather than promoting the authors new book of fiction. I would not doubt that there are people who thought it was an actual news story.

Made me sick.

[Ohioguy]

Re: British response

The British response?

The Muslim Council of Britain, which represents the country’s 1.6 million Muslims, said it had received 30,000 messages of hate via e-mail after the attacks and that its computers had been jammed.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8513942/

[LuxuryItem]

Re: British response

edited: this is getting out of hand.

[ThE-mAcHiNiSt]

Re: British response

@Lajawab

So do we…

When Ann Coulter, O’Reilly and others openly talk about invading Iran or Syria I guess their mouths should be blown off too…Why don’t you start with them?

I say, why not?? These are the two most defiant nations on Earth…destroy 'em and kill the terrorist’s morale!!

[hiccup]

Re: British response

@Ohioguy

The British response?

The Muslim Council of Britain, which represents the country’s 1.6 million Muslims, said it had received 30,000 messages of hate via e-mail after the attacks and that its computers had been jammed.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8513942/

You seem almost gleeful

[Thap]

Re: British response

OG,

You must have run up a huge phone bill, na!

[Reza_Pahlavi]

Re: British response

@Thap

OG,

You must have run up a huge phone bill, na!

I am sure AIPAC and other Zions were willingly paying his bills, and probably a few interns thrown in as well.

[Agent_Smith]

Re: British response

Attacks in London reminded me again a great quote from a Nazi leader.

Hermann Goering, Hitler's No. 2 man, before being sentenced to death at the Nuremberg trials said

“Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”