British Council official allegedly calls Muslims Nazis and Animals!

Muslim groups and individuals have flooded the British Council with complaints after learning that one of its senior press officers allegedly wrote controversial Sunday Telegraph articles attacking “the black heart of Islam”.

They appeared under the byline “Will Cummins”, which the Sunday Telegraph later described as a pseudonym.

Muslim organisations say the comment pieces incite racial and religious hatred, and the British Council describes the articles as deeply offensive.

But the Sunday Telegraph has refused to rule out publishing further contributions from the author of the articles. Its editor, Dominic Lawson, told the Guardian that he did not regret printing them.

The allegation is deeply embarrassing for the British Council, which works to improve relations between communities.

“Will Cummins” has compared Muslims to Nazis and argued that Muslim voters have a “global jihadi agenda”. One of his articles states: “All Muslims, like all dogs, share certain characteristics.” Another argues: “It is the black heart of Islam, not its black face, to which millions object.”

Other articles by the author have claimed that “Muslim foreigners … have forced themselves on us”, and that “Christians are the original inhabitants and rightful owners of almost every Muslim land and behave with a humility quite unlike the menacing behaviour we have come to expect from the Muslims who have forced themselves on Christendom”.

The author described voters in Leicester and Birmingham as “local Janjaweed” - in a reference to the atrocities committed in Darfur, Sudan - and claimed that Islam is “sanctified by the principle … that any civilisation, however repulsive, has the same value as any other”.

The British Council’s director general, David Green, has told the Muslim Council of Britain: “There is no place in the British Council for people who publish such hateful utterances.”

Con Coughlin, the Sunday Telegraph’s executive editor, told the Guardian in an emailed statement: “We have no idea whether or not we will use him [Will Cummins] in future.”
British Council in row over articles

Nice you have a council which promotes good relations with overseas countries and one of its official is a rabid anti muslim. To be honest he probably represents the Government in Power in the UK which is anti muslim as all can see in there policies towards muslim countries!

Why such articles and murmuring are becoming a fashion these days? Democratic nations are going thru a reverse gear.
May be these intellectuals are tired of one sided religious harmony. May be they are fed up of appeasement policies.
The status Muslims get in a democratic state, do non-Muslims get the same in Islamic states? I think not.
Muslims, however democratic they are, they in fact are in a position to diver the election trends in many countries. No Indian politician can talk openly in support of Israel, though we know the truth. From appeasement policy to reservations for Muslims, many Hindus have changed their attitude towards such dirty politics.
Not only in India, but in many democratic countries people have same feelings. And it comes out in different speeches.
Muslims are not ready to compromise anywhere, to mould as per the society demands, at the same time want everything to be as per their choice.

(Though, I strongly object for using abusing word for any community.)

your post is an entire excuse for such bigoted views that this british council member holds.

Saying they are tired of appeasment what the hell is that, so if for example i am tired of hindus putting red dots on there head can i start calling them nazis and animals?

[QUOTE]
hindus putting red dots on there head
[/QUOTE]

This reminds me of something Sheikh Faysal al-Jamikee (fakAllaahu asrah) said which cracked me up.

This is just nobody desparately trying to become a somebody by jumping on the bandwagon. Apparently he failed miserably.

AK, in fact it is a political thread and you have opened it at religious forum. This is the problem. Your community makes political demands on behalf of religion. Time is over; people are tired and now understand these tactics.
Someone from British council uses some abusive words for your community and you are hurt.
In Quran a verse says that non-believers are just like dogs, you are not hurt, and rather for that you have definitions, interpretations and contexts.

anjjan, i make no demands of my country or goverment that as a tax paying citizen i don't have the right to make. i break no laws of the country i was born and reside in. I belive in justice, equality and peace as my religious obligation and i serve my community - this i do not define to be muslims but everyone.

I abhor the racist comments Cummins made as well as your support for them.

The only part I am in agreement with you is on that such statements are indeed very fashionanble and acceptable now.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by anjjan: *
AK, in fact it is a political thread and you have opened it at religious forum. This is the problem. Your community makes political demands on behalf of religion. Time is over; people are tired and now understand these tactics.
Someone from British council uses some abusive words for your community and you are hurt.
In Quran a verse says that non-believers are just like dogs, you are not hurt, and rather for that you have definitions, interpretations and contexts.
[/QUOTE]

anjjan i think your middle name is Excuses am i right!

You making more excuses again what is this. If you was an employee who keeps making excuses you would be fired long time ago!

The guy in British council is a bigot plain and simple

Re: British Council official allegedly calls Muslims Nazis and Animals!

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by ak47: *
Muslim groups and individuals have flooded the British Council with complaints after learning that one of its senior press officers allegedly wrote controversial Sunday Telegraph articles attacking "the black heart of Islam".

They appeared under the byline "Will Cummins", which the Sunday Telegraph later described as a pseudonym.
...
[/QUOTE]

O' Common! Man! you don't make any sense.

Will Cummins is not exploding Shia mosques.
Will Cummins is not beheading unarmed Pakistanis.

OTOH on this very board,
Mullah-Tullahs are calling other Muslims as "Dogs"!
Mullah-Tullah Aya-Tullah are calling Shia Muslims as Mushriks!
Wooha-bibis are declaring Mazar visitors as Kuffar!

Now you decide who hates Muslims more? A poor pen-freek or the Araab rafeek freek?

Time to kick some Feekay terrorist's A$$

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by anjjan: *
In Quran a verse says that non-believers are just like dogs, you are not hurt, ...
[/QUOTE]

Quran is a book of love not hate, my Bharati bud!
It is the menace called Mullah Tullah Aya-tullah that spreads hate. You can see it on this very board.

Please don't lower yourself to the level of Mullah-Tullah OinkBL and start quoting Quran out of context (or attribute wrong meanings to it).

Who owns The Telegraph? You would be surprised.

Dear Antibol,
Quran is book of love and not hate. This is your interpretation.
Quran divides the whole community into two; believers (Muslims) and non-believers (non-Muslims), can you tell me if there is a single verse in Quran which has love for non-believers (non-Muslims)?

AK, do you have any argument?

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by anjjan: *
Quran divides the whole community into two; believers (Muslims) and non-believers (non-Muslims)

[/QUOTE]

While I work on getting you relevant verses, I'd request not to insert parenthesis in your description.

How can I judge if you are a believer or not? Simply put, Ehle Tarika i.e. Sufi Maslak would respect you and honor you if you believe in truth, trustworthiness, and tolerance.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by anjjan: *
....
Quran is book of love and not hate. This is your interpretation.
....
[/QUOTE]

All holy books including Bible, Torah, and yes Gita are the source of love and inspiration. That is my interpretation.

Time to kick the terrorist A$$$

antibol :
If by holy books you mean revealed books then please only refer to the Quraan, the Bible and the Torah. I forgot the name of the book revealed on Noah

^there are many more holy books than the ones you've listed.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by zman: *
antibol :
If by holy books you mean revealed books then please only refer to the Quraan, the Bible and the Torah. I forgot the name of the book revealed on Noah
[/QUOTE]

I just said "holy books". Kapeesh!

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by anjjan: *
Quran is book of love and not hate. This is your interpretation.
Quran divides the whole community into two; believers (Muslims) and non-believers (non-Muslims), can you tell me if there is a single verse in Quran which has love for non-believers (non-Muslims)?

AK, do you have any argument?
[/QUOTE]

"This day are (all) things good and pure made lawful unto you. The food of the People of the Book is lawful unto you and yours is lawful unto them. (Lawful unto you in marriage) are (not only) chaste women who are believers, but chaste women among the People of the Book, revealed before your time,- when ye give them their due dowers, and desire chastity, not lewdness, nor secret intrigues if any one rejects faith, fruitless is his work, and in the Hereafter he will be in the ranks of those who have lost (all spiritual good). (, 5:5)"

our noble Messenger Muhammad (peace be upon him) who said, "One who hurts a dhimmi (non-Muslim citizen of the Khilafah State), he hurts me; and one who hurts me, hurts Allah."

in regards to people who have different religion:

"There should be no coercion in the matter of faith." (2:256)

there you go!

So, AK you find some verses with love for non-believers. Food to and fro is allowed. A believer can marry a chaste woman from non-believers. Your quote 5.5, the same benefit is not given to a non-believer.
Re love for Dimmi, what if a Dimmi does not pay jazya, the protection money.

There is no compulsion in religion. Verily, the Right Path has become distinct from the wrong path. Whoever disbelieves in Taghoot and believes in Allah, then he has grasped the most trustworthy handhold that will never break. And Allah is All-Hearer, All-Knower. 2.256

You want to say (without reference) that this verse is in love for non-believers. It is the only a polite verse (quoted for particular political reasons) against hundreds odds where non-believers (non-muslims) are called deaf and dumb.

Dear Atibol, I can not argue your statements made in individual capacity. Your statements are far from thesis of Islam.
Islam does not recognize Sufism.
As per Islam your definition of a believer has no meaning. The truth as per Islam is complete faith in the sayings of Muhammad Prophet, there is no compromise.
Do you reject ‘there is no god other than allah’, if Gita is equally a holy book for you, as Gita has its own god, rather gods.

hey antibol, cool your jets, alright !!!

anjaan

keep on hating because your wasting our time!