British anger at terror celebration

You probably thought this would be about “Islamic” terror. Keep reading:

British anger at terror celebration

By Ned Parker and Stephen Farrell

The commemoration of Israeli bombings that killing 92 people has caused offence

AS ISRAEL wages war against Hezbollah “terrorists” in Lebanon, Britain has protested about the celebration by right-wing Israelis of a Jewish “act of terrorism” against British rule 60 years ago this week.

The rightwingers, including Binyamin Netanyahu, the former Prime Minister, are commemorating the bombing of the King David Hotel in Jerusalem, the headquarters of British rule, that killed 92 people and helped to drive the British from Palestine.

They have erected a plaque outside the restored building, and are holding a two-day seminar with speeches and a tour of the hotel by one of the Jewish resistance fighters involved in the attack.

Simon McDonald, the British Ambassador in Tel Aviv, and John Jenkins, the Consul-General in Jerusalem, have written to the municipality, stating: “We do not think that it is right for an act of terrorism, which led to the loss of many lives, to be commemorated.”

In particular they demanded the removal of the plaque that pays tribute to the Irgun, the Jewish resistance branch headed by Menachem Begin, the future Prime Minister, which carried out the attack on July 22, 1946.

The plaque presents as fact the Irgun’s claim that people died because the British ignored warning calls. “For reasons known only to the British, the hotel was not evacuated,” it states.

Mr McDonald and Dr Jenkins denied that the British had been warned, adding that even if they had “this does not absolve those who planted the bomb from responsibility for the deaths”. On Monday city officials agreed to remove the language deemed offensive from the blue sign hanging on the hotel’s gates, though that had not been done shortly before it was unveiled last night.

The controversy over the plaque and the two-day celebration of the bombing, sponsored by Irgun veterans and the right-wing Menachem Begin Heritage Centre, goes to the heart of the debate over the use of political violence in the Middle East. Yesterday Mr Netanyahu argued in a speech celebrating the attack that the Irgun were governed by morals, unlike fighters from groups such as Hamas.

“It’s very important to make the distinction between terror groups and freedom fighters, and between terror action and legitimate military action,” he said. “Imagine that Hamas or Hezbollah would call the military headquarters in Tel Aviv and say, ‘We have placed a bomb and we are asking you to evacuate the area’.”

But the view of the attack was very different in 1946 when The Times branded the Irgun “terrorists in disguise”. Decades later, Irgun veterans are unrepentant. Sarah Agassi, 80, remembers spying in the King David Hotel.

She and a fellow agent posed as a couple. They danced tangos and waltzes, sipped whisky and wine while they cased out the hotel.

On the day her brother and his fellow fighters posed as Arabs delivering milk and brought seven milk churns, each containing 50kg of explosives, into the building. Ms Agassi waited across the street until her brother rushed out. She said that she then made the warning call to the British command in the hotel.

Sitting in the luxurious hotel lobby, she expressed no regret. “We fought for our independence. We thought it was the right way . . . If I had to fight for Israel, I swear even now I would do anything.”

TWO VERSIONS

The original wording:

The Hotel housed the Mandate Secretariat as well as the Army Headquarters. On July 1946 (sic) Irgun fighters at the order of the Hebrew Resistance Movement planted explosives in the basement. Warning phone calls had been made urging the hotel’s occupants to leave immediately. For reasons known only to the British the hotel was not evacuated and after 25 minutes the bombs exploded, and to the Irgun’s regret and dismay 91 persons were killed.

The amended version

. . .Warning phone calls had been made to the hotel, the Palestine Post and the French Consulate, urging the hotel’s occupants to leave immediately.

The hotel was not evacuated, and after 25 minutes the bombs exploded. The entire western wing was destroyed, and to the Irgun’s regret 92 persons were killed.

Re: British anger at terror celebration

Somebody's hero is some other body's villain. Thats how it has always been.

Re: British anger at terror celebration

exactly, but the point of this forum is bascially to bash Israel and Jews by picking out random stories and posting them here..........

and like a packing of jackals these posters will jump on this thread and start their conspiracy theories about Greater Israel

Re: British anger at terror celebration

You agreed that somebody’s hero is somebody’s villain, so why do you have a problem if Israel is somebody’s villain?

Re: British anger at terror celebration

because this topic is pointless

u said it yourself, there is no point to paste news and this is basically what it is

we have many anti-israeli threads going, do we really need another one?

Re: British anger at terror celebration

This is not just a news.

Re: British anger at terror celebration

The terorirst who was prominent in this outrage later on was voted in as Prime minister of Israel. They have a history of electing terrorists as their Prime ministers.

Re: British anger at terror celebration

nelson mandela was considered a terrorist and he became president

i guess the south africans have a history of electing terrorists as well

Re: British anger at terror celebration

There is a differnce, Mandela was not a terrorist, Begin and Sharon are.

Re: British anger at terror celebration

Wow some difference.

Nelson Mandela's group was responsible for numerous bombings in South Africa in the 1970 and 1980 which killed innocnet people.

If you can classify Begin and Sharon as being terrorists, why dont you classfiy Yasser Arafat as a terrorist as well?

Oh I forgot, only Jews are considered terrorists by you.

Re: British anger at terror celebration

and vice versa..

as somoene said, one persons hero is anothers villain. no harm in sharing this info though. Interesting to know.