Most, if not all, of the previous prophets have been accused of taking bribe and being an agent. It will be funny to ask mr. extreme, that if we assume that the british helped a false prophet prosper, we also allah was unable to stop them (naoozubillah) ???
Also, in 1952, 53, when there was mass killing of the ahmadis, in order to clean them off from the surface of the earth, who saved them?? It was an islamic country, and no british were there to save the ahmedis!! allah has promissed himself that he punishes the false prophet! Why was a need felt for the Molvis to do the job of allah?? and who saved the ahmedis?? was anyone more powerful than allah (naoozubillah), who managed to save them thru this time???
- THE FIRST LIE: " THE ARRIVAL OF BRITISH EMPIRE IN INDIA."
Extreme talked of this report published in 1870! However, he has failed to give the name of the publisher so anyone could carry out further inquiry!
However, the same allegation has been published in the white paper against the ahmedis by the government of pakistan. They also gave the name of the press where it was published. It was found out that:
a) there is NO such book as was specified by the government in its so called white paper.
b) there is no such press as was specified by the government in their so called white paper.
c) The british meuseam has confirmed that NO SUCH REPORT HAS BEEN EVER PRESENTED IN THE BRITISH PARLIAMENT!
If anyone wants, they can investigate this matter personally, by asking Mr. extreme about where has this report been published. and it will become evident!
- THE SECOND LIE : " self implemented seedling"
It is highly irresponsible , that mr. extreme, in his UNORIGINAL and STOLEN essay has compared two statments:
REAL : " Government should take great care regarding this SELF-IMPLANTED SEEDLING . ."
DISTORTED : I am the "Self-implanted/Self-cultivated Seedling " of the British Government.
As it is evident, the “self implanted seedling” is the only thing common between the real statment, and its presentation by Mr. extreme!
Please make it clear that the term was used For the family of Mirza ghulam ahmed of qadian, who had been deprived of their lands by the government, besides their services to the government, as explained by extreme. It is interesting to note that the family of mirza sahab, which is being talked about, was NOT AHMEDI but was SUNNI, so this reference, by their own method, prove SUNNIS to be self-appointed seedlings of the british!!!
- Caught in your own trap!
Please keep in mind, the koranic verses you posted, and how you used them against the sayings of mirza ghulam ahmad. Now please observe the saying of your own scholars:
→ Allama Muhammad Iqbal:
On the death of queen victoria, he was of opinion that it is another example of the sad incident of muharram:
" mayyat uthee hai shah ki tazeem kay liye,
iqbal urr kay khaak-e-sar-e- rahguzaar ho
soorat wohi hai naam main rakha huwa hai kya?
daitay hain naam maah-e-muharram ka hum to,
kehtay hain aaj eed huwee hai, huwa keray
is eed say to maut hee aaye khuda keray! "
This is your “mujaahed-e-aazam”!!
→ Molvi mohammad hussain bataalwi ( ehle hadith ):
" Sultan-e-rome, aik islami baadshah hai, lekin amne-aam, aur husne-intezaam kay lihaaz say BRITISH GOVERNMENT bhee hum musalmano kay liye kuch kum fakhar ka mojib nahee hai! Aur khaas kur groh-e- Ehle hadith kay liye, is waqt ki saltanat, balehaaz-e amn-o-azadi, is waqt ki tamaam islami saltanaton. rome, iran, kharasaan, say burh ker fakhar ka mojib hai!"
( ash’at sunnah, number 10, volume 6, page 292 )
“Ehle hadith is saltanat ki reaayaa honay ko, islami saltanat ki reaaya honay say behter jaantay hain!”
( this was their own point of view till yesterday! And now they claim its mirza ghulam ahmed who is the british agent! )
→ maulana zafar ali khan ( majlis-e-ahraar )
" Musalmaan aik lamha kay liye bhee is hakoomat say bad-zun honay ka khayaal bhee nahee ker saktay! Agar koi BADBAKHT musalmaan government say sarkashi ki jurrat keray, to hum dankay ki chot kehtay hain, kay woh musalmaan musalmaan nahee!!!"
( please note that they think who isnt loyal to british government, is not even a muslim. Then how come mirza ghulam ahmed is being called a non-muslim for being loyal to the british government??? )
" apnay baadshah-e- aalam panah kee peeshani kay aik qatray ki bajaye apnay jism ka khoon khoon bahaanay ko tayyaar hain! aur yehi haalat Hindustaan kay TAMAAM MUSALMAANO ki hai "
( according to this statment, all indian muslims become “self planted seedling” !! In such a state of affairs when people say that in order to remain a muslim, one must be loyal to the british government… why exactly did the british government need to lift a “self planted seedling”??? )
( “zemeendaar” newspaper, 11th november 1911 )
→ Muftis of Khana ka’aba:
following muftis of khana ka’aba have given “fatwa” that India is “daarus salaam” and no jehad against government is allowed:
- jammaluddeen bin abdullah shaikh umar, (hanfi) mufti makka mukarma
- Hussain bin ibraheem ( maalki ) mufti makka muazzama
- Ahmed bin zahni (sha’fi) mufti makka muazzama
This uncovers a little from the character of the ancesstors of those, who are today trying to make allegations against the promissed messiah, peace be upon him!!
Now it is the the demand of rationality, justice, and “taqwa”, that keeping the koranic verses in mind, you MUST also conclude the same thing about YOUR OWN ANCESSTORS, your own allama iqbaal, and you own muftis of makkah, as you are concluding about the promissed messiah!!
O thou who runnest towards me with a hundred hatchets!
Have fear of the gardener,
For I am a fruit-bearing branch!
( mirza ghulam ahmed of qadian )
So be on watch for a day when heaven shall bring a manifest smoke
covering the people; this is a painful chastisement. ‘O our lord remove thou from us, the chastisement; we are believers.’ How should they have the reminder? seeing a clear Messenger has already come to them, then they turned away from him, and said,’ A man, tutored, possessed!"
( the koran, verse 11-14, chapter 44, Smoke, the nuclear explosion.)