Re: Breaking News....Shoaib Malik Gets Pakistan Captaincy according to "The Nation"
Why I think that Shoaib Malik is not the best choice, as I believe that he does not even deserve a place in the team on merit alone. Nevertheless, if he gets selected Captain in a country where nepotism, Shafarish and personal like/dislike matters more then merit, good luck to him.
I am not bias neither I have favourites. I also trust figures when it comes to merit. Figures can tell everything about a player and most of the time that is what matters most. Compare the figures with complementary cricketers and one can found out how good a particular player was/is. No arguments no opinion, keep the figures in front and all related to cricket becomes as obvious as writing on the wall.
If team needs someone that controls the team regardless of personal performance, then why have cricketer as Captain? That could be done by anyone with strong personality and backing of authority. If that was the case, Shaikh Rashid could do better job as Captain than any cricketer (I mentioned Shaikh Rashid just as an example).
Thus, importance is that Captain justifies his inclusion in the team on merit and can control the team by earning respect due to his performance. Captain because of nepotism, Safarish, like/dislike may make someone in management happy, but that Captain could not earn the respect of players neither deserve to be Captain.
How a person can deserve his place guaranteed in the ream? That’s taking into account good player’s performance amongst top teams. To me only players that fall in below category should have guaranteed place in the team.
Batsman: Proven past record with over 2000 test runs and test batting average above 40. Recent performance over last 10 innings should be such that average overall average stays above 40 and recent average did not fell below 35 (bad patch but saved from past performance as overall average is still above 40).
Bowler: Proven past record with over 100 test wickets on average of below 25 runs per wicket and at around 4 wks per match. Recent performance over last 10 innings should be such that they took on average 1 wkts per inning at an average below 30 (bad patch but saved from past performance as overall average is still below 25 and they have taken on average of around 4 wkt per match).
**All-rounder: **They should justify their inclusion in the team either as batsman or bowler (fulfil one of the above criteria, of being Batsman or Bowler). Well, if they cannot, they could not justify their place in the team, but may get included if they are lacking behind the criteria by a narrow margin. For instance, have overall Batting average of over 35 and bowling average of under 30, even when they are going under bad patch, as in reality they should qualify using one of the above criteria of Batsman or Bowler.
Else, their place should not be considered as guaranteed in the team. If country has no player to replace them, they play else they go.
Wicket Keeper: should have test batting average of over 40. But if country does not have such wicket keeper in the country, then team may select the best without any guaranteed place.
To me, best team composition would be a team made up of 6 specialist batsmen (some may bowl to fill time), a good batsman wicketkeeper (having average over 40 and have safe hand), and 4 specialist bowlers (that can bat a bit).
If one have good all rounder batsman (player with average above 40) would be an added advantage at anywhere between No1 to No 7 in batting line up.
If a team has good all rounder bowler (player with bowling average of below 25) would be major advantage at No 8 in batting line up.
Here are names of some world class all-rounder that justified their place in the team on merit. Just look at the reason of their certainty for their place in the team. List is a bit unreal, as a player performance cannot be measured according to one yard stick, as with different era, value of statistical measurement also changes (according to performance of compatriot players), nevertheless, list shows some reality of measuring yard stick, and how it should works. Bold shows the reason of their secure place in the team.
A Greg: Batting average 40 bowling average 32
Richard Hadlee: Batting average 27 bowling average 22
Imran Khan: Batting average 37 bowling average 22
J Kallis: Batting average 55 bowling average 31
M Marshal: Batting average 18 bowling average 20
K Miller: Batting average 36 bowling average 22
Pollock: Batting average 32 bowling average 23
G Sobers: Batting average 57 **bowling average 34
Wasim Akram: Batting average 22 **bowling average 23
Sangakkara: Batting average 50.64 (12 hundreds and 22 fifties in 107 innings. 146 catches and 20 stumping)
Gilcrist: Batting average 48.66 (17 hundreds and 24 fifties in 129 innings. 344 catches and 37 stumping)
Wicket keepers and all-rounder with lower performance around the world are playing but I do not consider them as players having enough capability to justify their place in the team. Since country lacks replacement, they are playing.
Pakistani players that deserve to be in team on their performance are:
Batsmen:
Younus Khan:** Average 48.21**
Mohammad Yousuf:** Average 56.00**
Inzammam:** Average 50.64**
Taufeeq Umar: 39.29
Bowlers:
Shoaib Akhtar:** Bowling average 25.3** (169 wickets in 43 matches)
Mohammad Asif and Shabbir Ahmed have good records but have not proven yet with at least 100 test wickets.
Mohammad Asif: Bowling average 20.12 (49 wickets in 9 matches)
Shabbir Ahmed: Bowling average 23.03 (51 wickets in 10 matches)
Umar Gul: 30.62 (61 wickets in 14 matches)
All rounder:
None can justify their place in the ream on their batting or bowling performance.
What we have:
Shahid Afridi: Batting average above 37 (5 centuries and 8 fifties in 46 innings) bowling average 34 (47 wkts in 26 matches)
Shoaib Malik: Batting average 37 (1 centuries and 5 fifties in 29 innings) and bowling average 63 (13 wkts in 18 matches)
Abdul Razzak: Batting average 28 (3 centuries and 7 fifties in 77 innings) and bowling average 36 (100 wkts in 46 matches)
Though if team needs to select one all rounder, Shahid Afridi would do, if two then Razzak would do due to his bowling performance (on average of 2 wkts per match).
Actually team can be selected from available players. If there are not enough available players in the country, team may include below par players. That does not mean that country also have below par player as Captain, especially when country has good players.
Hence taking into regard overall performance over long period of time, deserving a place in test team, maturity, experience, I believe that these are best candidates for captaincy.
The best captain would be: Inzammam. Since Inzammam (due maturity, experience, age, and batting average) is out, hence:
Best would be: Mohammad Yousuf.
Second best would be: Younus Khan.
Third best would be: Shoaib Akhtar.
It would be different matter if we have Captain and players different for Test and One day. That would be ideal. If that would be the case, list would have different names.