aah - just as I was gonna do a Ctrl V ... :)
We took advice and were told quite correctly that this was the driest pitch produced during the tournament and that it would be difficult to chase and would turn. It has that reputation as well
So that means it was kinda planned. Inzi ki fault to na hoi then.
What is Pakistan’s strength – Bowling
What is Westindies Strength – Batting
The pitch favours whom? – Bowling side
What do aggressive leaders do? – Believe in their strengths and go for the kill
You do the math
As Bubloo said the wicket was expected to "turn", then why Shoaib Malik given overs so late and Afridi not at all? Why was Razzaq required to bowl and get thrashed?
A friend of mine pointed out how Inzi, before the match said he discussed it with Ganguly. Ganguly's advice was to bat first if Pakistan wins the toss. :p
Btw.. this was on htcricket.com
Not that Pakistan team totally relied on his advice, but very stupid of Inzi to go up to Ganguly asking him what to do in case he wins the toss.
The way I look at it, a 'good' team will win regardless of who bats first. Good teams make toss irrelevant. Pakistan team need some time to become "good". Lets accept it and move on.