Blasphemy Law

Re: Blasphemy Law

Well, yes. It is. The law simply makes no provision or excuses for that behavior. The law in no way suggests that if a person commits blasphemy, that person, their relatives, and immediate community need to pay the price. Nor is this behavior evident for non-Christians. I stand by what I said in other threads, this is a communal riot aimed at ethnic cleansing. India has no law of this nature, yet we see the same behavior.

It’s stretching credibility that any law could explain lawless behavior. And what we hear of exactly that…lawless behavior.

Does the law contribute to an atmosphere of hate? No. Repealing the law would. It would neccessarily allow for the denigration of sacred figures and texts. Yes, Islam in particular (so what?). Does the law target Christians in particualr? No. Has this law every actually been misused? Yes. Many times. Are there legal remedies? Yes.

Was there incitement? Yes. Always, in cases like this. Was it a rush to defend or implement this particular law? No. As per the law, the accusation against the Christian fellow would have simply saw his arrest and trial. What we saw was clearly not that.

The writ of the law provides no such justification.

Or no law at all? The same result.

You’re getting warmer! Most other countries call this incitement. And it’s usually across ethnic lines. It doesn’t take mundane laws, or religious sentiments, or any such thing. It takes a systematic and prolonged prodding and goading…we see this all over Africa, and we see it on the subcontinent.

We need more laws. Very strict anti-incitement laws.